Blueballer
Transhumanist Consultant
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2011
- Messages
- 5,214
- Reaction Score
- 15,973
People go wild on here for a back door cut, or a touch pass, or anything the UConn posts do that is a thing of beauty to watch. Well, the men do that too.
So why the backlash over the dunk. The dunk is important because it is the highest percentage shot when you can make it comfortably. For Griner, it's a high percentage shot. She is the first woman that can claim that. She can go up, at will, in traffic, and throw it down. THE FIRST EVER. That's why it's important.
As for the game, it's even more important to her teammates. Not so much the second, because it was already a blow out, but that first dunk changed the game. It was a demoralizing dunk to the opponent, and her team was as fired up as I've seen all season.
There is no doubt that the dunks were special plays in my mind. None at all. I still wonder if Parker had never done it against UConn if people would feel the same way here.
First of all the first sentence of your post points out that "We" or many of us, love the well executed back door or touch pass. Perhaps we love it more because it is a team function rather than a dunk which is an individual play. As has been stated before and the reason for starting the thread isn't a dislike of dunking per say but the need of the media to replay it and talk about it ad-nauseum after it happens.
And I will not feel any differently about this when we have a player who dunks. (Which may be next year). Doesn't matter that Parker did it. Won't matter when a Husky does it. It just isn't a big deal. It's a once in a while play for the women and it won't be elevated to an art form like it is for the men anytime soon.