I know it's going to sound crazy, but the first step is actually for you to stop posting on this board. That's the thing that will really get the "UCONN out of the AAC" train moving, so you're going to have to suck it up if you want us to be an elite program again.This three game span regardless of wins and loses is a strong reminder of how far UConn has fallen from Big East to AAC. ECU, USF, and Tulane, this is stretch to even be a mid-major schedule.
No way you can return to a elite program in this conference. How does UConn get out of the AAC????
Yes, but so is Wagner, and we lost to them, at home, with a complete lineup. Winning by 20 on the road, with six healthy players, is pretty darned good no matter who you play.
I know it's going to sound crazy, but the first step is actually for you to stop posting on this board. That's the thing that will really get the "UCONN out of the AAC" train moving, so you're going to have to suck it up if you want us to be an elite program again.
Kind of like the horrible loss to Tulsa? Vance Jackson pointlessly went off in garbage time and then, uh... never stopped since.Couldn't agree more. Finding anything - positive or negative - from last nights game is comical. This is a lost season.
Man, based upon all your prior posts I was sure you were a real fan and would take one for the team. I guess we're going to be stuck in mediocrity forever.Another computer tough guy. If you don't like me posting you can just ignore or block me. You must be such a loser! sorry..
Did I see Rodney make a layup in traffic?
Saw some good things but again it's against USF. Take a peak at their schedule/results, they are beyond awful.
I'm not sure if anyone ever claimed in the past making shots against Coppin State was the same as making shots against Syracuse, but here we are.
For many years UConn has seemed to play up or down to the level of its competition. Maybe that's not supported by the stats but it sure seems that way.
It's nice to kick the s--- out of a s----- team sometimes.
Yep. There's a group of people here that think if you're not having a tantrum about the season like a 5 year old who had his favorite toy taken away, that means you're "OK" with how the season is going. Seems miserable.When you shoot 29% against bad teams, shooting 60% against ANYONE is good news.
It's really sad to me to see so many people incapable of taking any pleasure in UConn beating the pants off a conference foe -- horrid or not -- on its home court.
Yes, folks crapping all over on UConn in this thread (and this isn't directed at whaler11 personally), WE GET IT: this UConn team is not good, and USF is worse. You're not more "realistic" than the rest of us by pointing that out. You're just a Debbie Downer.
On a good team, Vance Jackson is a very solid, 20-25 min per night type a player. Thats my point. The only good this year has done is it gave valuable minutes to two guys who on a good team, are role players. Sure, it adds to UConn's depth. But, overall, neither Jackson nor Vital will be a key to next year's success. We have no front court. Anyone who takes yesterdays' result and somehow projects that to next year is fooling themselves.Kind of like the horrible loss to Tulsa? Vance Jackson pointlessly went off in garbage time and then, uh... never stopped since.
Some people just don't get this at allYes, but so is Wagner, and we lost to them, at home, with a complete lineup. Winning by 20 on the road, with six healthy players, is pretty darned good no matter who you play.
We see great teams like SMU this year or Dayton the past few years with basically no frontcourt at all. Duke usually only has one big on the court and it's a lanky power forward playing the 5. College ball is guard dominated. I'm glad we have the young skilled players we do even if we lack a great young big man as of right now.On a good team, Vance Jackson is a very solid, 20-25 min per night type a player. Thats my point. The only good this year has done is it gave valuable minutes to two guys who on a good team, are role players. Sure, it adds to UConn's depth. But, overall, neither Jackson nor Vital will be a key to next year's success. We have no front court. Anyone who takes yesterdays' result and somehow projects that to next year is fooling themselves.
You don't have points, you have opinions. Don't confuse the two. I see nothing in your last two posts that resembles a real point, just a lot of angsty, emo irrationality.On a good team, Vance Jackson is a very solid, 20-25 min per night type a player. Thats my point. The only good this year has done is it gave valuable minutes to two guys who on a good team, are role players. Sure, it adds to UConn's depth. But, overall, neither Jackson nor Vital will be a key to next year's success. We have no front court. Anyone who takes yesterdays' result and somehow projects that to next year is fooling themselves.
On a good team, Vance Jackson is a very solid, 20-25 min per night type a player. Thats my point. The only good this year has done is it gave valuable minutes to two guys who on a good team, are role players. Sure, it adds to UConn's depth. But, overall, neither Jackson nor Vital will be a key to next year's success. We have no front court. Anyone who takes yesterdays' result and somehow projects that to next year is fooling themselves.
Rodney appears to be realizing that less means more for him.
Assuming everyone is healthy, Vital is our 4th option at guard and Jackson(assuming we start 3 front court players) is 4th or 5th in the rotation. So yeah, they are role players on a good team.Vital and Jackson won't be key to UConn's success next year?
Yeah, its totally good practice to put no credence in opinions that differ from yours. Guess we know who you voted for President.You don't have points, you have opinions. Don't confuse the two. I see nothing in your last two posts that resembles a real point, just a lot of angsty, emo irrationality.
Forgive me if I put no credence in the opinions expressed in such posts. I've found it's good practice to categorically dismiss opinions driven by such unchecked negativity. Nothing personal.
I bet Vital starts at SG next year, with Alterique & MAL as off-the-bench options. And I bet that Vance & Terry are our starting forwards.Assuming everyone is healthy, Vital is our 4th option at guard and Jackson(assuming we start 3 front court players) is 4th or 5th in the rotation. So yeah, they are role players on a good team.
If we can rebound at all next year it will be off to the races with those guards and Larrier. Was looking for some of that this year but with the injuries will have to wait for next year. In the meantime, tons of minutes and experience for CV and VJ. Future does look bright from here.We see great teams like SMU this year or Dayton the past few years with basically no frontcourt at all. Duke usually only has one big on the court and it's a lanky power forward playing the 5. College ball is guard dominated. I'm glad we have the young skilled players we do even if we lack a great young big man as of right now.
Next year we'll be using 2 SFs the majority of the time in Larrier and Jackson. Vance is going to be a huge part of the team. And honestly, even though we will miss the rim protection we have this year, our offense will likely be a ton better with 4 of Adams, Larrier, Jackson, Gilbert, Vital, and Ashton-Langford on the court most of the time. The spacing and ball movement should be much better and it will allow us to play with much better pace.
Not sure I agree on the Vital part. Adams and Gilbert are sure fire starters. MAL and Vital will come off the bench.I bet Vital starts at SG next year, with Alterique & MAL as off-the-bench options. And I bet that Vance & Terry are our starting forwards.