Theme with Most of our Losses | The Boneyard

Theme with Most of our Losses

Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,162
Reaction Score
6,678
Now defending without fouling has been a problem all season even in their wins, but two themes have been clearly evident in most of their losses:

1. Inability to knock down their open and lightly contested 3s.

2. Inability to finish in the paint and at the rim.

There were so many shots last night that were just a smidgen off, that just didn't go down. Last couple seasons more times than not, those were going in, especially during winning time.

They can score in bunches, but their draughts and inconsistency has been a constant sorrow.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
376
Reaction Score
893
Now defending without fouling has been a problem all season even in their wins, but two themes have been clearly evident in most of their losses:

1. Inability to knock down their open and lightly contested 3s.

2. Inability to finish in the paint and at the rim.

There were so many shots last night that were just a smidgen off, that just didn't go down. Last couple seasons more times than not, those were going in, especially during winning time.

They can score in bunches, but their draughts and inconsistency has been a constant sorrow.

No 1 is the thing I never would have predicted. I knew our D wouldn't be the same without Castle and Clingan but with AM coming on board along with Alex, Solo and the rep that Liam had coming in, I thought we would be able to just out score other teams. I was expecting scores in the 80's or 90's most games. shows what I know.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,730
Reaction Score
10,537
Now defending without fouling has been a problem all season even in their wins, but two themes have been clearly evident in most of their losses:

1. Inability to knock down their open and lightly contested 3s.

2. Inability to finish in the paint and at the rim.

There were so many shots last night that were just a smidgen off, that just didn't go down. Last couple seasons more times than not, those were going in, especially during winning time.

They can score in bunches, but their draughts and inconsistency has been a constant sorrow.
Pretty much all of players that drive to the basket play below the rim and are not very long or super athletic. Tough to finish against Kalk or anyone with those qualifications. Pretty much all of our shooters outside of Solo are very streaky or prone to slumps.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,769
Reaction Score
16,792
The D problem. Lack of foot speed and lateral movement.

Missing at the rim. We play below it. Even LM. Has LM dunk in a game?
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2024
Messages
302
Reaction Score
1,026
LM makes a lot of smart plays. He makes the right move in the lane, but he can't finish. Not strong enough to finish in big east play. Needs to put on some muscle too.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
4,066
Reaction Score
8,613
We as a team are slow. That is a big part of our defensive issue. We tried to drive it but AK and LM are not going to rise over most defenders. Yesterday we again wound up with multiple shot clock violations which goes to players passing up open shots and too much passing it around between the key and halfcourt before we attack. Liam tried to generate offense when we stalled but he puts his head down and rarely passes so everyone just watches him. These are common themes when we struggle, plus the team wide poor 3 point shooting nights. Empty possessions.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
5,670
Reaction Score
20,909
Now defending without fouling has been a problem all season even in their wins, but two themes have been clearly evident in most of their losses:

1. Inability to knock down their open and lightly contested 3s.

2. Inability to finish in the paint and at the rim.

There were so many shots last night that were just a smidgen off, that just didn't go down. Last couple seasons more times than not, those were going in, especially during winning time.

They can score in bunches, but their draughts and inconsistency has been a constant sorrow.
Now defending without fouling has been a problem all season even in their wins, but two themes have been clearly evident in most of their losses:

1. Inability to knock down their open and lightly contested 3s.

2. Inability to finish in the paint and at the rim.

There were so many shots last night that were just a smidgen off, that just didn't go down. Last couple seasons more times than not, those were going in, especially during winning time.

They can score in bunches, but their draughts and inconsistency has been a constant sorrow.
1742091728903.jpeg
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
2,053
Reaction Score
6,897
It has to be our defense and specifically the inability of UConn to play 1 on 1 defense. Hot players go off and there is no one for UConn that is able to stop them. Creighton game first half is a perfect example.

Having said that, if you look at the box score of all our losses, the key stat is FTA disparity and turnovers and they seem to be correlated in some way.

TeamFTM-FTAUConn FTM-FTAUConn turnovers
Memphis29-4019-24103 out-of-conference losses
Colorado18-2810-139FTA disparity is 98 vs 48
Dayton27-307-1158 TO avg/game
@Villanova
12-132-413
Creighton14-155-58In 7 BE losses
@Xavier17-2413-1713FTA disparity is 129 vs 102
St John's 12-1614-221813 TO avg/game
@Seton Hall13-1616-2116
@St John's 21-2723-2918
Creighton13-182-46

Overall FTA disparity 224 vs. 150 in all 10 losses. When UConn does not turn it over, they tend to send the other team to the line. When the FTA disparity is more even, the problem seems to be UConn TO's. IDK. Also UConn turns it over much more in losses in-conference than out-of-conference. Below, the high-major wins.

TeamFTM-FTAUConn FTM-FTAUConn turnovers
Baylor 12-1926-337FTA disparity is 62 v 70 UConn
@Texas 15-2411-16149.6 TO avg/game
Gonzaga 15-1918-218
 
Last edited:

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,466
Reaction Score
14,447
IMO there are three sets of games here.

Fluke games UConn should have won (SHU and Nova) where things happened that never should have happened. Just flukes you can’t really draw conclusions from at all. I’d argue Memphis and Colorado fall here also with the technicals/over the back calls. These are the games that you look at after the season and just kick yourself for losing. There is no line that ties these games together and all were winnable without complete choke jobs.

Then you have injury games where Diarra and McNeeley were out, hurt or acclimating to being back. These also coincided with Karaban’s extreme funk. I’d say three games fall here X, SJU and Creighton. All in all you don’t put much thought into these games bc UConn was hobbled.

Then you have the three games UConn was just beat SJU, Creighton and oddly Dayton. You can argue the Creighton game was bad calls but they lead almost all game. Two of those teams are arguably just better than UConn this year. One is a top five team and the other has Hurleys number.

That’s just my opinion though.


Sorry, transposed Dayton and Colorado
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
2,650
Reaction Score
10,716
IMO there are three sets of games here.

Fluke games UConn should have won (SHU and Nova) where things happened that never should have happened. Just flukes you can’t really draw conclusions from at all. I’d argue Memphis and Colorado fall here also with the technicals/over the back calls. These are the games that you look at after the season and just kick yourself for losing. There is no line that ties these games together and all were winnable without complete choke jobs.

Then you have injury games where Diarra and McNeeley were out, hurt or acclimating to being back. These also coincided with Karaban’s extreme funk. I’d say three games fall here X, SJU and Creighton. All in all you don’t put much thought into these games bc UConn was hobbled.

Then you have the three games UConn was just beat SJU, Creighton and oddly Dayton. You can argue the Creighton game was bad calls but they lead almost all game. Two of those teams are arguably just better than UConn this year. One is a top five team and the other has Hurleys number.

That’s just my opinion though.


Sorry, transposed Dayton and Colorado
You’re forgetting the fluke games we won but probably shouldn’t have, like both games against Marquette.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
34,160
Reaction Score
99,939
Horrid first halves is more than likely the theme. They come out play great until the 16 minute time out and then crap the bed for 8-10 minutes. Scary pattern but it’s even there for many wins.

I will say this for the 8-9 game this will be a team as good as Creighton or better so one and done if that doesn’t change. Add to the other teams fire is we are still in their minds looking for a 3 peat. Whoever it is wants that scalp!
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,435
Reaction Score
23,805
We're much better when we play hard on defense. Our problem is that we only play hsrd in stretches, usually in the 2nd half after we've dug a hole for ourselves.

Play desperately for 40 minutes, we'd be significantly better
 

Rico444

In the mix for six
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,802
Reaction Score
31,142
I hate to say it, but this team doesn't have the mental toughness that most UConn teams have. They have a really hard time stopping the bleeding.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2021
Messages
1,226
Reaction Score
4,809
No 1 is the thing I never would have predicted. I knew our D wouldn't be the same without Castle and Clingan but with AM coming on board along with Alex, Solo and the rep that Liam had coming in, I thought we would be able to just out score other teams. I was expecting scores in the 80's or 90's most games. shows what I know.
With all that you mentioned, you would think that. However, it goes to show how important Clingan was to our team. He was a space eater, rebounder and shot blocker that would clean up the defensive lapses of others. REED imo can be somewhat like him as long as he does not make mental defensive lapses.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
4,275
Reaction Score
10,549
They are pretty much firmly in the 8/9 game. In years like this it's almost like a 10 is better than an 8.
 

Chin Diesel

The timing could not possibly be worse
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,855
Reaction Score
107,935
Pretty much all of players that drive to the basket play below the rim and are not very long or super athletic. Tough to finish against Kalk or anyone with those qualifications. Pretty much all of our shooters outside of Solo are very streaky or prone to slumps.
The D problem. Lack of foot speed and lateral movement.

Missing at the rim. We play below it. Even LM. Has LM dunk in a game?

This is a very below athletic team. No one is an elite athlete at their position.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,466
Reaction Score
14,447
You’re forgetting the fluke games we won but probably shouldn’t have, like both games against Marquette.

Perhaps I should have called them losses by a single possession where UConn had legitimate chances to win the game at the end and didn't. I shortened to fluke games. UConn played in five such games all year. They went 1-4.

I am counting the Butler game as it was OT but not the PC game as PC hit a shot in the final seconds to make it a single possession game.

UConn won a decent number of close games this year but as shown above did not fair well in single possession games.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
14,554
Reaction Score
98,060
How many games have we had 4 scoreless minutes
I don't know if anywhere tracks that specifically but this is probably the closest stat to that. We're surprisingly pretty good at not allowing other teams to go on 10-0 runs, which would presumably be the outcome of extended scoreless droughts.

This chart is a few weeks old, our current numbers would put us at the Houston logo.

IMG_8799.jpeg
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
14,554
Reaction Score
98,060
Perhaps I should have called them losses by a single possession where UConn had legitimate chances to win the game at the end and didn't. I shortened to fluke games. UConn played in five such games all year. They went 1-4.

I am counting the Butler game as it was OT but not the PC game as PC hit a shot in the final seconds to make it a single possession game.

UConn won a decent number of close games this year but as shown above did not fair well in single possession games.
But that's the problem with arbitrarily picking and choosing what games count to make a point. Why does the Providence game get excluded for a last second shot to make it a 1 possession game, but Baylor doesn't count for Hassan making 2 FTs with 1 second left to turn a 2 point win to 4? Winning a bunch of games by 4-6 points instead of 3 doesn't mean we sucked in close games
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
3,187
Reaction Score
22,732
The 2023 team had glaring weaknesses that were mostly buttoned up by late January/early February. imo, the switch flipped in H2 of the Xavier home game when Sanogo started running the offense at the perimeter so teams couldn’t just ignore AJax to overload the paint. Ironically enough, the C having the ball at the perimeter is one of our major frustrations this year

I don’t think the glaring weaknesses have been fixed this year, and it might just be a personnel issue

Not going to beat the dead horse on misjudging several players, but I’m not sure what playbook adjustment can be made on March 16th to help the team score. Our only playmakers are Liam (can catch fire at any time but frankly has been inconsistent and has regressed to <40% shooting) and Diarra (6th man with 1 functioning leg who was forced into the role). I understand the computers love our offense, but my eyes notice how many times we need to fight an uphill battle because we couldn’t score for 5 minutes and the opposing team went up double digits. This includes inferior competition like Nova, GTown, DePaul

Our defense doesn’t need as much detail. It’s not good and a much bigger issue. When the team gives a full 40 minutes of focused and high effort defense, it doesn’t look too bad. But that rarely happens

I think this team is a coin flip right now. If we’re 100% on, we look really good and can make a run. If we’re off for 5-10 minutes this week, we’re getting rolled in the 8/9 game

So I’m just going to sit back, enjoy the ride, and cheer on my favorite team :)
 

Online statistics

Members online
322
Guests online
2,487
Total visitors
2,809

Forum statistics

Threads
162,037
Messages
4,289,051
Members
10,122
Latest member
angelo


.
..
Top Bottom