The View From Section 241 (or QQ) — BC | Page 3 | The Boneyard
.

The View From Section 241 (or QQ) — BC

No, the only one not giving their ordinary meaning to your words is you. Maybe you think “is” and “seems to be” mean the same thing. They most certainly do not. The word “is” is definitive. The phrase “seems to be” implies maybe.

All you had to do the first time to avoid the beating is a simple “my bad.” Why is that so damn hard for people?
Hahaha, my post got more likes than his at the time. Some beating. You have gone down the rabbit hole of absurdity. Next time wait until after dinner before you jump in.
 
I'm trying to stay neutral here and not criticize RSTurd, I mean RSTuthill (whoops).

I would enjoy an ACC invite this coming spring with our former BE members (BCU included).

Maybe the B1G could kick the "Birth Canal" to the curb and they could join too.
 
Hahaha, my post got more likes than his at the time. Some beating. You have gone down the rabbit hole of absurdity. Next time wait until after dinner before you jump in.
Did you think maybe the “like” was for another part of the post?
 
No, the only one not giving their ordinary meaning to your words is you. Maybe you think “is” and “seems to be” mean the same thing. They most certainly do not. The word “is” is definitive. The phrase “seems to be” implies maybe.

All you had to do the first time to avoid the beating is a simple “my bad.” Why is that so damn hard for people?

UConn has passed BC in basketball, that much is obvious to everyone. But that UConn's passing of BC is permanent is speculative. It's surely proper to say that UConn's passing of BC seems to be permanent, but eternity is a long time, so it's reasonable to avoid the prediction that it is permanent.
 
UConn has passed BC in basketball, that much is obvious to everyone. But that UConn's passing of BC is permanent is speculative. I think it's proper to say that UConn's passing of BC seems to be permanent, i.e. that BC will never catch up, but eternity is a long time, so it's reasonable to avoid the prediction that it is permanent.
“Passed” does not bring permanency with it. If a political reporter writes that “X has passed Y in the polls,” it’s not fair to interpret that as a statement that the reporter is claiming X will therefore win the election because the passing was permanent.
 
some of us are acting as if UConn has passed BC permanently in football like they seem to have done in basketball.
Above is what he said to spark the kerfuffle.

“Passed” does not bring permanency with it. If a political reporter writes that “X has passed Y in the polls,” it’s not fair to interpret that as a statement that the reporter is claiming X will therefore win the election because the passing was permanent.

"Passed" by itself does not bring permanency, but "passed permanently" does.

If a political reporter writes that "X has passed Y permanently in the polls," it is fair to interpret that as a statement that the reporter is claiming X will therefore win the election because the passing was permanent.
 
UConn has passed BC in basketball, that much is obvious to everyone. But that UConn's passing of BC is permanent is speculative. It's surely proper to say that UConn's passing of BC seems to be permanent, but eternity is a long time, so it's reasonable to avoid the prediction that it is permanent.
I believe the distance between where the two programs sit in terms of stature is far more relevant than the permanence of one being ahead of the other.

As we are tied for third in national titles it can be claimed that we have passed (name any high level program with no recent titles and fewer than three or four overall) that we have passed that program but there is valid reason to view the programs as being on a similar level.

I can argue that we've passed BC even more so than Villanova has passed LaSalle (who by the way happens to have won a national title).
 
For what it's worth, which is probably nothing, reading this thread today riled me up a little, so I sent a message to the Chief Marketing & Brand Officer of the ACC (Marques Zak MZAK@THEACC.org). My suggestion was to replace BC and talked up what bringing in UConn, and all that it brings with it, would do for the marketing department. I mentioned the 18 National titles in hoops, 3 in the last 3 years, the most recent NBA and WNBA rookies of the year and what Husky Alum George Springer did last night to launch Toronto into the World Series. All great things a marketing department could use.
Probably won't help, but certainly can't hurt getting our name into that conference's conscience. I tried.
Not a shock, but 2 days later and no response. I at least expected a form response, like when applying for a job. "Thank you for your interest in the ACC..."
 
I think the bigger and more relevant question is how does BC fix a broken athletic department. You keep on losing in the major sports like they are and you won't have much of a following. Are they committed to major college athletics? The ACC money is great, but to what end?
 
In the next evolution of conferences(10years? more?) you’ve got to wonder if there may be a provision implemented regarding performance by a School in the conference. The promotion and demotion of teams in the Premier league in Europe has been brought up more than once on the yard. Schools commitment to competitiveness ebbs and flows. In relation to athletic resources commitment, BC is not the same as it was 20 years ago.(maybe it is and has just not kept up). If there were a competitiveness clause, swapping UConn in and BC out would be a no-brainer.
 
FWIW, Maryland won't be jettisoned for basically the same reason that Oregon won't be. While the Ducks are underwritten by Nike, the Terps major donor is Under Armor.
Watching the BC game, we see that New Balance funds the Thunder chickens.
I can't believe New Balance is giving BCU all that much money. Under Armor gives a ton of dough to MD because the owner is an alum and likes to see his name in the paper. NB doesn't have that personal connection to BCU that I know of.
 
I can't believe New Balance is giving BCU all that much money. Under Armor gives a ton of dough to MD because the owner is an alum and likes to see his name in the paper. NB doesn't have that personal connection to BCU that I know of.

Maybe not money, but some clothing for the football team: New Balance and Boston College Expand Their Historic Sponsorship - Boston College Athletics

New Balance is based in Boston so they probably want to make sure the local teams don't go on the field naked.
 
Maybe not money, but some clothing for the football team: New Balance and Boston College Expand Their Historic Sponsorship - Boston College Athletics

New Balance is based in Boston so they probably want to make sure the local teams don't go on the field naked.

List of Teams with NB Sponsorship


NCAA
Soccer
[th]
Leagues/Sport​
[/th][th]
Teams​
[/th]​
 
UConn has passed BC in basketball, that much is obvious to everyone. But that UConn's passing of BC is permanent is speculative. It's surely proper to say that UConn's passing of BC seems to be permanent, but eternity is a long time, so it's reasonable to avoid the prediction that it is permanent.
nothing is permanent. the pain of watching basketball wither away in the AAC, is proof of that.
we did what we had to do in 2020, to keep the brand alive.

Everyone else is doing the same, but in the P2 era, they are ALSO doing what they can to keep others out.

That's where we differ. I don't think UConn has spent efforts keeping others out of basketball prominence, for our pockets' sake. We just rule on the court and then go home with our hardware. Oregon football has literally no hardware yet they rule the boardroom, cuz to them it's not about hardware; they found another way to make the money they want.

And same story with other "top" football schools who will never win a title but don't need to anymore. As long as they keep UConn and the other poverty schools out.
 
Last edited:
I think the bigger and more relevant question is how does BC fix a broken athletic department. You keep on losing in the major sports like they are and you won't have much of a following. Are they committed to major college athletics? The ACC money is great, but to what end?
Based on BC results it looks like they are just cashing the checks.
 
I think the bigger and more relevant question is how does BC fix a broken athletic department. You keep on losing in the major sports like they are and you won't have much of a following. Are they committed to major college athletics? The ACC money is great, but to what end?
BC needs to drop to FCS. Maybe even DII level. And no one in Boston will care, except hockey fans.
 

Online statistics

Members online
382
Guests online
5,819
Total visitors
6,201

Forum statistics

Threads
164,743
Messages
4,408,847
Members
10,229
Latest member
Gael


.
..
Top Bottom