The Private Equity College Sports Hellscape Thread | Page 9 | The Boneyard

The Private Equity College Sports Hellscape Thread

What happened to his prediction that big 12 Connecticut talks would be announced before the end of the year? I mean, I guess the year is over yet.
He has said the timeline is early 2025.
 
Did the discussion bring any interesting points to the table?

Imagine if we had P4 tv revenue - you'd have to think we'd jump up 30 spots or so.
Big discussion on private equity and basically how this is destroying college athletics. The schools have justified everything they are doing as making money which is used for the academic side. I’d like to find a link of the interview, but basically the hosts were attacking the proposal for 51% ownership of a college team by a private equity firm as they would no longer be looking at things from nonprofit/academic side. However, if they dropped to a 49% percentage with the schools in control, they did seem more amenable to it. Basically it was a depressing discussion about the ownership of college teams. The bright side is if we’re in this top-tier, a good private equity firm would not care about the so-called baggage we carry. Of course, Charlie Brown is always lurking with Lucy.
 

Wow, that surprised me that we're at 71 and only marginally better than Boise State. That BCU is valued 2.5-higher than us is equally appalling.
 
.-.
Our AD is really the perfect candidate for PE because we need revenue and because we are not in a power conference with power conference tv revenue, we have more upside on a percentage basis than almost any other AD in terms of unlocking potential value. I think this is what would get us into the Big12 or ACC.
 
Here it is in print:



College Athletics Valuations 2024​

RankProgramValuationRevenueConferenceCityPublic/Private
1.Ohio State University$1.318B$280MBig TenColumbus, OHpublic
2.University of Texas at Austin$1.281B$271MSECAustin, TXpublic
3.Texas A&M University$1.264B$279MSECCollege Station, TXpublic
4.University of Michigan$1.062B$230MBig TenAnn Arbor, MIpublic
5.University of Alabama$978M$200MSECTuscaloosa, ALpublic
6.University of Notre Dame$969M$224MACCNotre Dame, INprivate
7.University of Georgia$950M$210MSECAthens, GApublic
8.University of Nebraska$943M$205MBig TenLincoln, NEpublic
9.University of Tennessee$940M$202MSECKnoxville, TNpublic
10.University of Oklahoma$928M$199MSECNorman, OKpublic
11.Penn State University$924M$202MBig TenUniversity Park, PApublic
12.University of Southern California$923M$212MBig TenLos Angeles, CAprivate
13.Louisiana State University$916M$200MSECBaton Rouge, LApublic
14.University of Florida$865M$189MSECGainesville, FLpublic
15.University of Wisconsin$838M$198MBig TenMadison, WIpublic
16.Clemson University$800M$196MACCClemson, SCpublic
17.University of Oregon$780M$151MBig TenEugene, ORpublic
18.University of Arkansas$776M$167MSECFayetteville, ARpublic
19.University of Kentucky$775M$174MSECLexington, KYpublic
20.Auburn University$772M$195MSECAuburn, ALpublic
21.University of Iowa$747M$167MBig TenIowa City, IApublic
22.Michigan State University$740M$171MBig TenEast Lansing, MIpublic
23.Stanford University$687M$180MACCStanford, CAprivate
24.Florida State University$673M$170MACCTallahassee, FLpublic
25.University of Illinois$665M$148MBig TenChampaign, ILpublic
26.Duke University$659M$153MACCDurham, NCprivate
27.University of Washington$658M$152MBig TenSeattle, WApublic
28.Indiana University$653M$145MBig TenIndianapolis, INpublic
29.University of Mississippi$651M$142MSECOxford, MSpublic
30.University of South Carolina$650M$160MSECColumbia, SCpublic
31.University of Miami$639M$160MACCCoral Gables, FLprivate
32.University of Minnesota$637M$149MBig TenMinneapolis, MNpublic
33.Texas Tech University$619M$147MBig 12Lubbock, TXpublic
34.University of Louisville$595M$143MACCLouisville, KYpublic
35.University of Missouri$590M$142MSECColumbia, MOpublic
36.Purdue University$567M$124MBig TenWest Lafayette, INpublic
37.University of Kansas$553M$128MBig 12Lawrence, KSpublic
38.Vanderbilt University$551M$125MSECNashville, TNprivate
39.Texas Christian University$542M$149MBig 12Fort Worth, TXprivate
40.UNC-Chapel Hill$539M$139MACCChapel Hill, NCpublic
41.University of Arizona$532M$143MBig 12Tucson, AZpublic
42.University of Pittsburgh$524M$137MACCPittsburgh, PApublic
43.Mississippi State University$523M$116MSECStarkville, MSpublic
44.Baylor University$513M$137MBig 12Waco, TXprivate
45.University of Virginia$506M$141MACCCharlottesville, VApublic
46.Oklahoma State University$500M$122MBig 12Stillwater, OKpublic
47.Georgia Tech$498M$134MACCAtlanta, GApublic
48.Iowa State University$492M$116MBig 12Ames, IApublic
49.Syracuse University$487M$114MACCSyracuse, NYprivate
50.Northwestern University$486M$118MBig TenEvanston, ILprivate
51.North Carolina State University$481M$121MACCRaleigh, NCpublic
52.University of Maryland$477M$121MBig TenCollege Park, MDpublic
53.Virginia Tech$474M$130MACCBlacksburg, VApublic
54.University of California, Los Angeles$472M$105MBig TenLos Angeles, CApublic
55.University of Colorado$470M$127MBig 12Boulder, COpublic
56.University of Utah$468M$126MBig 12Salt Lake City, UTpublic
57.Kansas State University$444M$102MBig 12Manhattan, KSpublic
58.Boston College$443M$118MACCChestnut Hill, MAprivate
59.Rutgers University$417M$125MBig TenNew Brunswick, NJpublic
60.West Virginia University$403M$106MBig 12Morgantown, WVpublic
61.Washington State University$392M$79MPac-12Pullman, WApublic
62.University of California, Berkeley$386M$126MACCBerkeley, CApublic
63.Wake Forest University$362M$97MACCWinston-Salem, NCprivate
64.Brigham Young University$357M$106MBig 12Provo, UTpublic
65.Southern Methodist University$327M$86MACCDallas, TXprivate
66.Oregon State University$326M$92MPac-12Corvallis, ORpublic
67.San Diego State University$287M$104MMWCSan Diego, CApublic
68.Arizona State University$279M$115MBig 12Tempe, AZpublic
69.University of Cincinnati$216M$87MBig 12Cincinnati, OHpublic
70.University of Central Florida$181M$85MBig 12Orlando, FLpublic
71.University of Connecticut$178M$93MBig EastStorrs, CTpublic
72.Boise State University$176M$61MMWCBoise, IDpublic
73.East Carolina University$153M$63MAACGreenville, NCpublic
74.University of South Florida$150M$71MAACTampa, FLpublic
75.University of Memphis$148M$64MAACMemphis, TNpublic

Correction: This story has been updated to correct the valuation for North Carolina State University, which is worth $481 million. It also corrects the rankings of 16 other schools on CNBC’s list.
 
For teams that changed leagues, it will be interesting to see how their valuations change in the next few years. I'm not sure if this year's moves are even factored into these numbers, as revenue from this year's moves won't show up until June 30, 2025.

Will Texas in the SEC be enough to overtake Ohio State for the #1 spot?

Will Oklahoma rise from its current #10 valuation as a member of the SEC?

And then the B1G additions ---- how high will USC (#12) and UCLA (#54) rise as full-share members of the B1G?

Oregon (#17) and Washington (#27) are only half-share members of the B1G until 2030, so those programs will keep rising until they reach full-share status for conference revenue.

Maryland (#52) and Rutgers (#59) are still paying back their B1G loans, so their values will keep rising until those loans are paid back in full. Not sure how many more years that will be, but it shouldn't be many more.

When the Big 12 added Cincinnati (#69), Houston (NR), UCF (#70) and BYU (#64), they were not initially full-share members. I think that might have been amended when the 4 corner schools were added, but that wouldn't be reflected in these numbers, so I'm assuming their valuations will rise once that is factored into the financials above.

Washington State (#61) and Oregon State (#66) are likely going to drop further down the list going forward.

How is San Diego State (#67) worth more than UConn (#71)?!?!?!?!?
 
Our AD is really the perfect candidate for PE because we need revenue and because we are not in a power conference with power conference tv revenue, we have more upside on a percentage basis than almost any other AD in terms of unlocking potential value. I think this is what would get us into the Big12 or ACC.
The problem with the SEC programs is the SEC does not sponsor men's soccer. I think Texas will take over #1 soon.

It seems the valuations range from 2x to 4x annual revenues. UConn is just under 2x. Miss State is 4.5x, all because of football? UConn really takes a hit based on my last quoted paragraph. vvv So yes, it there is a great deal of upside for UConn if it joined a conference

"Ohio State University is the most valuable athletic program, worth an estimated $1.32 billion. The Buckeyes had $280 million in revenue in 2023, the most of any school. Other factors that helped propel the Buckeyes to the top of the rankings are an alumni base of over 600,000, a fan base of more than 11 million, boosters that donated nearly $60 million last year, and a football team that routinely has attendance of over 100,000 at its games."

"In aggregate, the SEC is worth $13.3 billion, an average of $832 million per school; followed by the Big Ten at $13.2 billion, an average of $734 million per school; the ACC at $9.6 billion, or $562 million per school; and the Big 12, at $6.7 billion, or $420 million per school."

"The list is reflective of the current enterprise value of each program, starting with a base revenue multiple of four for all institutions, and then adjusting the multiple for variables, including conference affiliation, estimated NIL spend, school subsidies, number of alumni and other factors that can catalyze future revenue growth and profitability. "
 
Did the discussion bring any interesting points to the table?

Imagine if we had P4 tv revenue - you'd have to think we'd jump up 30 spots or so.
Exactly. It seems that a large part of value is determined by media revenue. Thus schools who are on the outside, looking in, should be on the outside, looking in because they're worth less then the schools that are already in a P4 conference, because they have P4 media revenue. The reasoning is indisputably circular.
 
I would take the CNBC numbers with a grain of salt. SD State had an athletic budget of $66 million last year, but the CNBC numbers show a revenue number of $104 million.
 
.-.
The problem with the SEC programs is the SEC does not sponsor men's soccer. I think Texas will take over #1 soon.

It seems the valuations range from 2x to 4x annual revenues. UConn is just under 2x. Miss State is 4.5x, all because of football? UConn really takes a hit based on my last quoted paragraph. vvv So yes, it there is a great deal of upside for UConn if it joined a conference

"Ohio State University is the most valuable athletic program, worth an estimated $1.32 billion. The Buckeyes had $280 million in revenue in 2023, the most of any school. Other factors that helped propel the Buckeyes to the top of the rankings are an alumni base of over 600,000, a fan base of more than 11 million, boosters that donated nearly $60 million last year, and a football team that routinely has attendance of over 100,000 at its games."

"In aggregate, the SEC is worth $13.3 billion, an average of $832 million per school; followed by the Big Ten at $13.2 billion, an average of $734 million per school; the ACC at $9.6 billion, or $562 million per school; and the Big 12, at $6.7 billion, or $420 million per school."

"The list is reflective of the current enterprise value of each program, starting with a base revenue multiple of four for all institutions, and then adjusting the multiple for variables, including conference affiliation, estimated NIL spend, school subsidies, number of alumni and other factors that can catalyze future revenue growth and profitability. "

The problem is they lack men’s soccer? How is that remotely consequential?
 
Seriously though.
If the SEC played men’s soccer they would no doubt claim that they invented the game.
Some of these SEC programs could really load up and pay for championships. At a minimum it would be a way to up their championship totals outside of basketball and football. They could hire the best of the best college players or recruit directly from Brazil and Argentina. Imagine Messi coaching at Miami. If Messi were to get involved, I'm sure a Florida or Texas could throw their hats into the ring to play semi-pro ball. Crazy talk but championships are championships.

The Sun Belt has a few P4 programs:
Kentucky
South Carolina
West Virginia
Central Floria
 
Seriously though.

Some of these SEC programs could really load up and pay for championships. At a minimum it would be a way to up their championship totals outside of basketball and football. They could hire the best of the best college players or recruit directly from Brazil and Argentina. Imagine Messi coaching at Miami. If Messi were to get involved, I'm sure a Florida or Texas could throw their hats into the ring to play semi-pro ball. Crazy talk but championships are championships.

The Sun Belt has a few P4 programs:
Kentucky
South Carolina
West Virginia
Central Floria

Messi couldn’t be bothered.
 
.-.
I received an alumi e-mail that detailed how Hayley Segar (CLAS '17 and New London native) went on Shark Tank to pitch her swimsuit company ultimately making a deal with 2 of the sharks.
Alum Hayley Segar Wows ‘Shark Tank’ Judges, Lands a Deal with Two of Them - UConn Today
This is a fantastic story for her. Some of the swimsuits even have names corresponding to CT locales (Foxon, Harkness, Woodmont, Thames, Merritt).

Ok, great, now we have a nutmeg daughter and UConn alum who has the ears of some billionaire sharks...what's the next sales pitch gonna be?^_^
 
This whole thread is going to seem quaint in a couple of months time.

To use a Warren Buffet analogy, "Only when the tide goes out do you learn who has been swimming naked."

Universities are looking at total calamity right now.

Study the federal research dollars in any budget. Now, it's bad enough research has shut down (for some projects, they'll totally scuppered) but then realize that the university takes 60% of those dollars to cover overhead (building, salaries, benefits, materials). How are they going to make up the shortfall?

Good luck.
 
This whole thread is going to seem quaint in a couple of months time.

To use a Warren Buffet analogy, "Only when the tide goes out do you learn who has been swimming naked."

Universities are looking at total calamity right now.

Study the federal research dollars in any budget. Now, it's bad enough research has shut down (for some projects, they'll totally scuppered) but then realize that the university takes 60% of those dollars to cover overhead (building, salaries, benefits, materials). How are they going to make up the shortfall?

Good luck.
 

National media when UConn uses institutional support: I caN’T bEliEVe ThEy rEquIRe sUpPOrT tO mAiNTaIN ATheLITicS. UcONn sHoULd juST dRoP fOoTBalL

National media when FSU uses institutional support (probably): in this day and age it’s such a smart move to keep up with never ending arms race. Kudos to FSU for getting ahead and being proactive.
 
Last edited:
.-.

These writers do not understand how the revenue is generated for these programs. I will never discount the ability of a seller to find the stupidest private equity fund in the market, but I really struggle with how it is possible to assign value to any of these athletic programs that are dependent on student fees or some other kind of subsidy that can be cut off.
 

Ryan Brewer, an associate professor of finance at Indiana University Columbus.
There's a reason someone is an associate professor in finance...

actualize that potential and serve the greater university's initiative
The greater university good, which presumably would have a great deal to do with the student body and student athletes, is not being served by big-time college athletics. This guys is probably so blinded by all of this he can't possibly see that.

Sure, spin off these college football programs (and/or basketball for that matter) from their universities. The univesities get lisencing revenues (or some revenue stream) from the naming. The equity enjoyes the returns (or quite possibly not) from running these teams as professional sports franchises. Sure, I get the concept. But, what would that have to do with college athletics at it's core? Why would you need student athletes to be the participants? Now we're talking NFL super light. I would have to be real bored to tune in for that.....and I'm never that bored.
 
Ryan Brewer, an associate professor of finance at Indiana University Columbus.
There's a reason someone is an associate professor in finance...
Not sure what you're getting at here.
 
Not sure what you're getting at here.

I was just being snarky. I suspect this person did elaborate valuation methodologies without much thinking about real world implications. More to the point, I just don't see how these programs hold on to their fan base when and if they ever get meaningfully divorced from their universities.
 
I was just being snarky. I suspect this person did elaborate valuation methodologies without much thinking about real world implications. More to the point, I just don't see how these programs hold on to their fan base when and if they ever get meaningfully divorced from their universities.
Ah, gotcha.

I certainly agree with you that when pundits, lawyers, presidents and even judges talk about fairness and student athletes being paid they never ever ever look at an actual university budget to see what is going on.

If they did, they'd realize that regular students are subsidizing the vast majority of these depts (not all, there are a handful that have broken free) with much more than student fees.

As Im the father of a senior applying to college right now, I've seen that they are factoring in a bunch of costs to total cost of higher ed. that my child would pay regardless if she were a student or not. $4k over the money the school is going to take in. Yes, my daughter will have a cell phone whether or not she is in college. Yes, my daughter will pay commuter costs whether she's in college or on the way to a job.

These "costs" are only there because the schools needed to inflate actual costs in order to pay athletes. So brainless.

As for the last part, I've been saying for a while that the teams could keep their fanbase in much of the country (outside the west coast and northeast) by licensing the university's brand name for their professional enterprise. So they would be the UConn Huskies pro basketball or semi-pro basketball team.
 
Ah, gotcha.

I certainly agree with you that when pundits, lawyers, presidents and even judges talk about fairness and student athletes being paid they never ever ever look at an actual university budget to see what is going on.

If they did, they'd realize that regular students are subsidizing the vast majority of these depts (not all, there are a handful that have broken free) with much more than student fees.

As Im the father of a senior applying to college right now, I've seen that they are factoring in a bunch of costs to total cost of higher ed. that my child would pay regardless if she were a student or not. $4k over the money the school is going to take in. Yes, my daughter will have a cell phone whether or not she is in college. Yes, my daughter will pay commuter costs whether she's in college or on the way to a job.

These "costs" are only there because the schools needed to inflate actual costs in order to pay athletes. So brainless.

As for the last part, I've been saying for a while that the teams could keep their fanbase in much of the country (outside the west coast and northeast) by licensing the university's brand name for their professional enterprise. So they would be the UConn Huskies pro basketball or semi-pro basketball team.
We both know school costs aren't rising to cover athletes. They're rising because of admin bloat and expensive buildings
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,951
Messages
4,546,054
Members
10,428
Latest member
CarloPFF


Top Bottom