- Joined
- May 15, 2019
- Messages
- 1,290
- Reaction Score
- 3,423
And that would include, many of the posters scapegoat, B Adams. InterestingThe B/R app keeps plus/minus
Gaff -11
Jackson -5
Sanogo -4
Carlton -3
Everyone else was in the plus range
And that would include, many of the posters scapegoat, B Adams. InterestingThe B/R app keeps plus/minus
Gaff -11
Jackson -5
Sanogo -4
Carlton -3
Everyone else was in the plus range
The B/R app keeps plus/minus
Gaff -11
Jackson -5
Sanogo -4
Carlton -3
Everyone else was in the plus range
As is the take that Jackson deserves to be taking minutes from anyone at this particular time. As is the constant criticism on Hurley and his game management. Lord knows that some of the basketball savants on this board missed their true calling. Should have went into coaching. It's a process that needs to play out, so let it.This is a tired refrain. Why was it that Whaley never saw meaningful minutes last year until injuries pressed him into action? Was he not giving 100% in practice?
What's the harm in playing Jax more? It's been said he he is a good passer and has a decent handle for a guy his size. His negative was shooting....can he be worse than Cole/Gaff yesterday?As is the take that Jackson deserves to be taking minutes from anyone at this particular time. As is the constant criticism on Hurley and his game management. Lord knows that some of the basketball savants on this board missed their true calling. Should have went into coaching. It's a process that needs to play out, so let it.
So you would suggest replacing one non scorer for another? Based on the starting 5 who does he replace? Carlton and slide Whaley to the 5 spot? Until we get some consistent offense from someone other than Bouk, we're kinda in a questionable situation.What's the harm in playing Jax more? It's been said he he is a good passer and has a decent handle for a guy his size. His negative was shooting....can he be worse than Cole/Gaff yesterday?
HH, if Tyler plays, is he that second guy? This game was tailor-made for him, IMO.Bouknight isn’t the PG. He‘s the facilitator. There’s a difference. Jordan was a facilitator, Larry Bird was, he’s the guy that makes the defense adjust to him, thereby creating opportunities.
This team is desperate for another one. Cole just isn’t that right now. Like Sterling Gibbs he’s an undersized scoring guard. Gaffney could be that, but he plays so slow, he’s completely gun-shy out there. This is where I don’t like Hurley’s short leash. I think Gaffney can be the guy we need with some confidence. The other guy that can do that, and one who isn’t overwhelmed by the speed of things, is Jackson. The short leash is keeping him from becoming that guy. He needs minutes. He could lead us in assists by February. God knows, nobody else is stepping up to do it so far.
Martin needs to stop acting like he’s Ray Allen and go inside and hit some people. Adams is another guy who can score inside and is instead launching these ugly 3 balls. Sanogo, Whaley, Carlton all need to receive passes in the box. We simply aren’t getting them the ball.
I'm not saying make him a starter. I'm just saying maybe since he is so athletic maybe he can create/dish on a day when our 2 pg couldn't hit anything he should play more than 5 min... and see what happens?So you would suggest replacing one non scorer for another? Based on the starting 5 who does he replace? Carlton and slide Whaley to the 5 spot? Until we get some consistent offense from someone other than Bouk, we're kinda in a questionable situation.
HH, if Tyler plays, is he that second guy? This game was tailor-made for him, IMO.
Agree. I do think Tyler would have been a difference maker that would have forced them to come out of the paint to cover him.No. Because he is about the furthest thing from a facilitator. He’s a spot shooter off the catch. He can’t beat anyone off the dribble and is a poor passer. He’s a guy that benefits from other people being from facilitators. He’s the guy standing on the 3 point line when someone like Bouk or Jackson gets the ball into the defense and forces them to collapse, then passes out. Polley is the definition of a guy who really only scores off of an assist. Most bigs also require an assist. We have few assists, so we have minimal scoring by our bigs.
Akok might be able to be a facilitator at times. It’s easy to lob in to him and he’s a threat to shoot, attack or pass.
Yeah he looks like a worst version than Sid minus the paasing ability which is pretty good.These kids earn playing time at practice, why do so many of you assume that Jackson has earned more than he gets? His game play surely doesn't warrant anymore. It's a shame that the hype surrounding him is better than he is currently.
I get that. I was just using yesterday's starting lineup as the example, for comparison.I'm not saying make him a starter. I'm just saying maybe since he is so athletic maybe he can create/dish on a day when our 2 pg couldn't hit anything he should play more than 5 min... and see what happens?
Still can’t understand why we are not sneaking in a game Wednesday against a scrub squad just to get some more reps in. What’s the possible negative? We are already probably 7-8 games short on the year to this date in a normal year. Are we really not going to play another game until December 30th? That’s nutsAgreed, and I think that is the conundrum right now in regards to Hurley trying to give Jackson more minutes. He struggles mightily with his shooting and that isn't going to change this season. Also, as Hurley described, he's totally "lost defensively". So currently, Jackson is unable to help on either end. Its too bad, in a normal season there would have been more warm-up games to help get him up to speed at least on the defensive end. With his length and athleticism it would be great to have him out there to lock up the opposition's best offensive player. But absent more cupcakes, how much can Hurley sacrifice right now? Honest question. The guy needs some burn to learn but how much risk should coach take at the moment?
What's the harm in playing Jax more? It's been said he he is a good passer and has a decent handle for a guy his size. His negative was shooting....can he be worse than Cole/Gaff yesterday?
As a primary ballhandler?
Yeah he could be worse.
Agree. I do think Tyler would have been a difference maker that would have forced them to come out of the paint to cover him.
exactly...just more eloquently said..thx for expandingYeah agree there but I doubt anyone believes he could be the primary ball handler, at east I hope not. What I would like to believe is giving him more than 1 mistake and done could possibly allow us someone who could give us more than 2 pts and a couple rebounds in 27 minutes of play LOL. Brendan Adams was invisible in this one how Hurely allowed that many minutes is unbelievable. Hardly heard his name how could he have been out there that long if he wasn't mentioned? Way too much Cole/Gaffney and Cole/Gaffney/Adams for this team to be good. Not saying Andre is the answer but only 5 minutes a game will never help him on his confidence level, needs to have some rope.
No, we're looking for a game on the 23rd but will likely be the 27th because there's limited Big East options for the 23rdStill can’t understand why we are not sneaking in a game Wednesday against a scrub squad just to get some more reps in. What’s the possible negative? We are already probably 7-8 games short on the year to this date in a normal year. Are we really not going to play another game until December 30th? That’s nuts