nomar
#1 Casual Fan™
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 16,170
- Reaction Score
- 45,954
Dombrowski tried several times to sign him and then pivoted to giving extensions to Bogaerts and Sale after being rebuffed several times.
That’s why I can’t take any notion seriously that Sox ownership didnt try to keep Mookie here.
Well none of us knows exactly what happened but according to Betts they offered $300M, which was too low -- the Dodgers got him for $365M.
Looking back, Betts has long maintained that he never had a problem playing in Boston.
So, if the Red Sox had offered a similar contract to the one that he eventually signed in Los Angeles — a 12-year, $365 million extension — would Betts have actually stayed?
The answer, according to a recent Betts interview with Christopher L. Gasper of the Boston Globe, is simple.
“Absolutely, I just didn’t get it,” Betts told Gasper. “That’s the argument. I didn’t get it, so that’s why I am where I am.”
When have the Red Sox ever let their best player walk because they couldn't afford him?
It seemed pretty clear to me that the Sox unloaded him because of this:
Red Sox Duck Below Luxury Tax Threshold With Trade Of Mookie Betts, David Price To Dodgers
A lost off-season for the Boston Red Sox continued on its dreary journey as All-Star outfielder Mookie Betts and left-handed starter David Price were traded to the Los Angeles Dodgers in a three-way deal that included the Minnesota Twins.
www.forbes.com