- Joined
- Apr 24, 2022
- Messages
- 9,904
- Reaction Score
- 64,673
... and 40 makes out of 69 shots is way efficient, 58%. Of course, she's shooting 54% for the entire season and, no surprise, 100% on FTs
... and 40 makes out of 69 shots is way efficient, 58%. Of course, she's shooting 54% for the entire season and, no surprise, 100% on FTs
Interesting comparison. I have always felt that in each game someone on the team needs to “take the lid of the basket” by knocking down a 3, taking the pressure off the rest of the team to start knocking down shots as well.I was thinking Ash was more like Lou, a clutch shooter when the team needs a bucket
Q is not as good as Shade shooting the ball. She misses too much which I call turnovers. She needs to stop shooting as soon as she gets in the game. Shade is way ahead of Q playing defense . Q is going to get better but she is not there yet.My basis is that by my eye and the stats, Q seems to be the best 3 point shooter of the freshman. She’s shooting the highest percentage from 3 of the freshman, and has made the same number as Shade on 8 fewer attempts.
I can agree that she is a bit one dimensional at times. But her one dimension has consistently been that she can shoot the 3. I’m not saying she’s the best player of group, or playing the best basketball. She’s not even the best at generating open looks. But when she gets the really open looks, I’ve liked her ability to knock them down.
My post was intended to highlight how perimeter scoring from the freshman will be important. I tried to include positives about all three, to highlight how huge their impact has been and will be.
Q has a higher 3 point field goal percentage and is shooting a respectable 45.6% overall. After a recent game Geno wisecracked that he told Q to keep shooting even if she missed her first few shots and she looked at him like, “Are you crazy? Of course I’ll keep shooting “. He also said, “I love that”.Q is not as good as Shade shooting the ball. She misses too much which I call turnovers. She needs to stop shooting as soon as she gets in the game. Shade is way ahead of Q playing defense . Q is going to get better but she is not there yet.
NICE stat analysis!!
I like Q too and think she has great potential. She doesn't have to be Aubrey 2. I agree it would help her to get stronger and put on a little weight. I also hope she will develop more of an inside game offensively- in my opinion, her outside shooting is too streaky. Team needs her to box out and grab rebounds which she is doing to some degree. It's a fun ride so far this season watching them all gel and get better!I’m also a Q fan and agree that the comparison to Aubrey is not all that apt.
Similar in height, but what else? Sure, maybe Q could bulk up to approximate Aubrey’s strength, but can she ‘speed’ up?
And they’re not all that similar in personality, at least as it shows up on the offensive side. Aubrey is a finisher and a reluctant midrange and perimeter shooter. Q is a dynamite perimeter shooter who doesn’t take a lot of midrange shots but seems unafraid to go to the rim either on the break or on an inbounds play. We haven’t seen her slash to the rim in a half court set.
And on defense, it’s hard to find a real similarity. Q will improve, make the right switches, figure out how to disrupt the passing lanes, block more shots with those long arms.
Q is already a clever rebounder and she’ll improve at boxing out, but she may never be the ‘energizer bunny’ Aubrey often is when it comes to rebounding. For one thing, she’s not much of a leaper while Aubrey might as well wear a cape some nights.
When Aubrey is ‘on’ I think opposing teams feel like she is everywhere — blocking their shots, stealing their passes, turning every mistake into a fast break layup — while Q is harder to spot on defense, a subtler presence. She doesn’t present opponents with the “shock and awe” campaign Aubrey does.
I suspect that Q can develop her game in some of these areas, but we will primarily know her as a deadly perimeter shooter who plays subtle but effective defense, sneaks into the paint to steal a rebound from the bigs, and can get out on the break. And we’ll be very pleased with the contribution she makes.
If I were @Carnac (where is he anyway?) I might predict a career average stat line like 14 pts, 50% fgs, 40% on 3s, 4 rebounds, 2.5 assists, 1.5 steals, 2 blocks. A line like this will get her into the W.
maybe she's not as good as Azzi but I was taught your best ability is your availability and she is definitely more available and durable than Azzi now imagine if they're both available next year and if Paige stays..OMG!!!I‘m not quite prepared to say that Ashlynn is the equal of Azzi, the player she essentially replaced in the starting lineup. But what is clear is that Ashlynn is more aggressive shooting the ball than Azzi, she gives relentless effort on both ends of the court and her strength and conditioning permit her to play the entire game at an extremely high performance level.
I agree with a lot of ur points but let not compare a freshman to a seasoned veteran it's not fair, a better comparison would probably be to wait until the end of the season and compare their freshman campaigns. It's only been 3 months.I’m also a Q fan and agree that the comparison to Aubrey is not all that apt.
Similar in height, but what else? Sure, maybe Q could bulk up to approximate Aubrey’s strength, but can she ‘speed’ up?
And they’re not all that similar in personality, at least as it shows up on the offensive side. Aubrey is a finisher and a reluctant midrange and perimeter shooter. Q is a dynamite perimeter shooter who doesn’t take a lot of midrange shots but seems unafraid to go to the rim either on the break or on an inbounds play. We haven’t seen her slash to the rim in a half court set.
And on defense, it’s hard to find a real similarity. Q will improve, make the right switches, figure out how to disrupt the passing lanes, block more shots with those long arms.
Q is already a clever rebounder and she’ll improve at boxing out, but she may never be the ‘energizer bunny’ Aubrey often is when it comes to rebounding. For one thing, she’s not much of a leaper while Aubrey might as well wear a cape some nights.
When Aubrey is ‘on’ I think opposing teams feel like she is everywhere — blocking their shots, stealing their passes, turning every mistake into a fast break layup — while Q is harder to spot on defense, a subtler presence. She doesn’t present opponents with the “shock and awe” campaign Aubrey does.
I suspect that Q can develop her game in some of these areas, but we will primarily know her as a deadly perimeter shooter who plays subtle but effective defense, sneaks into the paint to steal a rebound from the bigs, and can get out on the break. And we’ll be very pleased with the contribution she makes.
If I were @Carnac (where is he anyway?) I might predict a career average stat line like 14 pts, 50% fgs, 40% on 3s, 4 rebounds, 2.5 assists, 1.5 steals, 2 blocks. A line like this will get her into the W.
The freshmen have to play against seasoned veterans every game. If that's not a comparison, I don't know what is.I agree with a lot
I agree with a lot of ur points but let not compare a freshman to a seasoned veteran it's not fair, a better comparison would probably be to wait until the end of the season and compare their freshman campaigns. It's only been 3 months.
No kidding ..but I'm talking specifically about the comparison between Aubrey and QThe freshmen have to play against seasoned veterans every game. If that's not a comparison, I don't know what is.
I understood what you meant, and I think we get to compare the freshmen to upperclassmen because that's who they'll play against in practice and in games. Obviously we need to make allowances for experience and maturity -- that's the very stuff comparisons are made of. Perhaps that's what you were thinking too, that allowances needed to be made and maybe you thought I wasn't making enough of them.No kidding ..but I'm talking specifically about the comparison between Aubrey and Q
Agree. There were a few times where she drove into the lane, and then had no where to go, and no options. I wonder if she had not gotten there so quickly (LOL), and so deep, if there would have been a better outcome. One play, she drove in and tried to bounce pass to Ice, however it seemed that it was too late, and the defenders closed out the space.I am a big KK fan. I can't remember a UCONN PG who was as quick as her as she blows by any defender on her way to the basket. Plus, even allowing for her overly aggressive one on one defense, which I think will get her in foul trouble in a few games, I think she might be our best one on one defender. She is a handful now and will only get more so over the next 3 years as our PG.
However, she does need to stop making the decision to charge into a group of taller defenders, with only one thing on her mind---shooting. Numerous times in the last 5-6 games she has barged into the lane only to lose the ball, be tied up or take a impossible shot when a more experienced PG would kick the ball out to an open teammate. This is probably just a FR mistake which the coaching staff will work with her to correct.
I think Moriah Jefferson was quicker. KK, however, is bigger and stronger and is probably a better long-distance shooter as a freshman than Moriah was. Moriah had strong 3-point percentages in her latter years.I am a big KK fan. I can't remember a UCONN PG who was as quick as her as she blows by any defender on her way to the basket. Plus, even allowing for her overly aggressive one on one defense, which I think will get her in foul trouble in a few games, I think she might be our best one on one defender. She is a handful now and will only get more so over the next 3 years as our PG.
However, she does need to stop making the decision to charge into a group of taller defenders, with only one thing on her mind---shooting. Numerous times in the last 5-6 games she has barged into the lane only to lose the ball, be tied up or take a impossible shot when a more experienced PG would kick the ball out to an open teammate. This is probably just a FR mistake which the coaching staff will work with her to correct.
I knew Q was special when they played the games in Croatia last summer. One game in particular, it may have been the first game, she came in the game and immediately started jacking up shots with reckless abandon and never seemed phased when she missed. I said whoa, that is not the typical freshman mentality. True to form, she has remained unphased and is a good, not yet great, shooter. She will become great before she leaves UConn. I tell you what, I would not trade our three true freshmen for any other group of freshmen.Q has a higher 3 point field goal percentage and is shooting a respectable 45.6% overall. After a recent game Geno wisecracked that he told Q to keep shooting even if she missed her first few shots and she looked at him like, “Are you crazy? Of course I’ll keep shooting “. He also said, “I love that”.
View attachment 94875