- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 662
- Reaction Score
- 3,248
UConn’s dominance in women’s basketball is not going to be a reason we’re excluded from a conference. That’s just not how conference realignment works.They also don’t want a team in their conference that dominates like UCONN women. UCONN would have more visibility and be even more attractive to recruits that want more visibility in a stronger conference. They already think we get ALL the recruits. It’s funny how other conferences brag about their strength, but in all the maneuverings around college sports can’t figure out how to include a DYNASTY in their conference. SO…they scream football.
Football drives the bus. Full stop. Conference decisions are based on football performance (far more than basketball), overall athletic investment, attendance, TV viewership, media markets, the value a school adds, and, yes, politics and relationships.
Women’s basketball excellence is part of our brand, but it isn’t a negative. If private equity ever seriously enters the space, it could even come down to a major investor insisting UConn be included because of the total value we bring.
The path forward is pretty straightforward: football has to improve, and basketball has to at least maintain its national relevance. If Geno eventually retires, the program must make a top-tier hire to preserve that brand.
Basketball is who we are, but football is what gives us a real shot at conference inclusion.