The ACC move

[upstater]

The biggest problem for UConn is the $50 million ACC fee for Maryland.

This will be litigated, IMO. The ACC will want to send a message to the rest of the league that the $50 million is for real, and if UMd wants to leave it will have to pay at least 80% of it. If not, they'll go to court.

This will mean UConn may be hanging for an invite for many years. Unless Maryland departs and lets the court system determine how much it owes.

Things are going to get ugly here.

 

[Vuce]

I disagree upstater - I thought that would be the case with the Big East rules then the revised Big East rules and ultimately if a school is invited somewhere else and they want to go, something will be worked out and they will bolt. It may be years of litigation but Maryland will be in the Big Ten as planned for the 2014-15 season. So will Rutgers.

 

[upstater]

I disagree upstater - I thought that would be the case with the Big East rules then the revised Big East rules and ultimately if a school is invited somewhere else and they want to go, something will be worked out and they will bolt. It may be years of litigation but Maryland will be in the Big Ten as planned for the 2014-15 season. So will Rutgers.

This is the first out of the barn for the ACC. They want to close those barn doors.

The BE had become used to the brutality.

 

[Chuck]

The biggest problem for UConn is the $50 million ACC fee for Maryland.

This will be litigated, IMO. The ACC will want to send a message to the rest of the league that the $50 million is for real, and if UMd wants to leave it will have to pay at least 80% of it. If not, they'll go to court.

This will mean UConn may be hanging for an invite for many years. Unless Maryland departs and lets the court system determine how much it owes.

Things are going to get ugly here.

Things may get ugly, but I can't see how Maryland will be in the ACC during the ugliness. They're gone. If the ACC doesn't have a notice provision (and maybe even if it does), they are gone starting in fall 2013. The $50 million may impact other moves. For example, will Clemson be as quick to move if Maryland gets dinged for $50mm or if a court makes a point of finding that the amount was lowered due to Maryland voting against the exit fee increase (Clemson apparently voted for the increase)? I don't know if this helps UConn or not, but I can't see how anything that has occurred will lead to the Terps being in the ACC for much longer.

 

[Vuce]

The statement from Swofford that was just on McMurphy's tweet was something like - they have been an outstanding member, we are sorry to see them leave. Doesn't sound like they are fighting it too much.

 

[brasssbonanzaa]

The biggest problem for UConn is the $50 million ACC fee for Maryland.

This will be litigated, IMO. The ACC will want to send a message to the rest of the league that the $50 million is for real, and if UMd wants to leave it will have to pay at least 80% of it. If not, they'll go to court.

This will mean UConn may be hanging for an invite for many years. Unless Maryland departs and lets the court system determine how much it owes.

Things are going to get ugly here.

No, it's being reported MD will pay the fee.

 

[freescooter]

That is less than 2 years of big 10 revenue...which it has been reported the B-10 will lend them and recoup over 10 years. I've always said that no exit fee will prevent schools from switching conferences. make it 50 million, make it 500 million. At the end of the day it isn't in anyone's interest to keep a school that wants to be gone.

 

[The Funster]

I'm just not sure that is true. The ACC is the slowest guy if you are assuming Texas doesn't leave the Big XII. I don't think Texas leaving, though, for the Big Ten, SEC or Pac Ten one day is totally out of the question. And, despite quality of play (which we've seen means very little), without TX the ACC is likely to survive over the Big XII.

We can't assume Texas is doing anything and until they do, the ACC is on the bottom of the big 5 conferences.

 

[uconNYC]

Biggest issue for UConn is actually FSU's BCS ranking. ACC will feel pressure to add a school that helps their football side. Kinda stinks because only 2 years ago we were the up-and-coming football side and UL were a total mess.

 

[businesslawyer]

We can't assume Texas is doing anything and until they do, the ACC is on the bottom of the big 5 conferences.

Not what I said. The ACC is clearly #5 of the 5. We were talking, however, about whether they would be the one to be pushed out if the world ever changes to 4. Totally different analysis.

 

[junglehusky]

Will it still be litigated if Plank just sends over a briefcase full of cold hard cash?

 

[uconNYC]

We can't assume Texas is doing anything and until they do, the ACC is on the bottom of the big 5 conferences.

Only a year back the B12 was close to collapse and no one wanted anything to do with University of Texas.

 

[sportsart]

With PP and GDL in charge I'm looking forward to losing to Duke and Wake Forest on a regular basis. Yippee......

 

[pepband99]

Will it still be litigated if Plank just sends over a briefcase full of cold hard cash?

This.

 

[RS9999X]

They will argue about the number. Maryland's "No" vote will be a court issue both parties want to avoid as it is recent and was imposed top down

The BiG wll be offering $30 mil plus in media money by the time the new playoff distribution contracts are signed and the 2017 Tier I contracts. I think its possible they double the ACC in payouts in 2017. They payout $25 mil now,

 

[The Funster]

Not what I said. The ACC is clearly #5 of the 5. We were talking, however, about whether they would be the one to be pushed out if the world ever changes to 4. Totally different analysis.

If they are 5th of five aren't they the next to caught by the bear? That wasn't my analogy but what makes you think they'd suddenly be better than the Big 12 if Texas doesn't leave?

FWIW, I don't think it's just going to be just 4 conferences. My point was simply that Swofford has been no genius and he has only succeeded because the Big East was more inept. Again, the bear analogy was someone else's analogy, not mine.

 

[Marty Jackson]

This. The BE laid the groundwork for its destruction well over ten years ago. They cobbled together a bunch of eastern independents and just expected everything to be fine. The combination of bad design (hybrid conference) and terrible management was insurmountable.

and yet the ACC seems to be all too willing to head down that road as well...
ND is a bb only correct? it may or may not happen but G'town and Nova are discussed as possible bb onlies as well.
So, what does that say about the next 20 years for the ACC? DOOMED!

 

[LRock34]

First, I can't say I'm optimistic.

I've been optimistic in the past, not so much about UConn getting an invite somewhere, but in events falling in such a way where the Big East would not be gutted. Without fail, that optimism was purely misplaced - as such, I am out of the optimism business. If my luck holds, Maryland turns down the Big Ten and peace reigns throughout the land...and we die alone in the Really New New Big East.

However, in your scenario, UConn goes to the ACC....

I won't miss the New Big East. Louisville, Cincy and South Florida were just schools we happened to end up in the lifeboat with after the first raid. I'd like them to land on their feet and I suspect one or two of them might. South Florida won't. But past that, they are just names to me.

I would definitely miss the 'old' Big East in basketball. Georgetown, Nova, PC and St. John's - we'll basically never have those sort of rivalries again. Even Syracuse and Pitt would be strange - stakes would seem different.

I can't see ever actually caring about the ACC, though. Syracuse fans are so eager to assimilate that they are practically acting like founding members of a conference they're not even in yet - I actively dislike almost every ACC school and that would not change. There's no circumstance where I would root for UNC to win an out of conference game like I might with Syracuse or Pitt or Providence or whoever from the (current) Big East.

As for Rutgers, eh. There's no real heat to that rivalry - Boston College would be more of a hatefest from the word go.

This is exactly why we belong in the ACC. We will hate every team in the conference and College athletics will be exciting again. There is nothing exciting about beating USF, Temple, Memphis...but a win against BCU, Pitt, Cuse. I will fly back home for that first game against BCU, no other team in the nation could motivate me to do that.

 

[Dogdeacon]

This is exactly why we belong in the ACC. We will hate every team in the conference and College athletics will be exciting again. There is nothing exciting about beating USF, Temple, Memphis...but a win against BCU, Pitt, Cuse. I will fly back home for that first game against BCU, no other team in the nation could motivate me to do that.

Do you mean UConn vs BC in football or basketball?

For basketall I don't think any non-BC person has ever purposefully flown to watch a BC Basketball game because they are mediocre. Renewing that game/series 'rivalry' will be a letdown. Part* of BC's motivation to move to the ACC was they were getting their a$$es kicked by UConn basektball and they did not want to see the same thing happen in football. Yes it might be nice to re-establish dominance in hoops over BC again, but its not a rivalry if its one-sided.

* I know BC had other reasons and in retrospect even if they started the era of shifting/ruining conferences they do deserve some credit for being out in front of it and landing safely & securely. I.e. Benedict Arnorld would have a better rep if we were still an English colony...

 

[nomar]

I *really* want an invitation to the ACC. But if and when we get one, I will feel relief rather than elation. I find it BIZARRE how gleeful Syracuse fans have been throughout all of this. Some of it is due to some weird schadenfraude, I guess. I don't really understand why their primary emotion wouldn't be sadness at the downfall of the Big East. How screwed up is it that I can't walk from my office to the Garden on a Wednesday or Thursday to watch the BET? How pathetic is it that our conference (should we join the ACC) will revolve around Tobacco Road? Gross. I would never in a million years taunt Georgetown fans about getting left behind. It's all very strange. Frankly, I don't get why the SU board is so anti-UConn. If I recall correctly, that board actually spun off this board back in 1999 or so. Most of the originals had a good relationship with us and respected UConn. Somewhere things went bad and I can't even go over there. It's toxic. Anyway, this turned into a tangent. But my point is that I'll feel mixed emotions if we join the ACC. Relief and sadness. It will be a great basketball conference but the Big East was a great basketball conference, one in which UConn has been the big dog.

 

[ASweet3781]

I *really* want an invitation to the ACC. But if and when we get one, I will fee; relief rather than elation. I find it BIZARRE how gleeful Syracuse fans have been throughout all of this. Some of it is due to some weird schadenfraude, I guess. I don't really understand why their primary emotion wouldn't be sadness at the downfall of the Big East. How screwed up is it that I can't walk from my office to the Garden on a Wednesday or Thursday to watch the BET? How pathetic is it that our conference (should we join the ACC) will revolve around Tobacco Road? Gross. I would never in a million years taunt Georgetown fans about getting left behind. It's all very strange. Frankly, I don't get why the SU board is so anti-UConn. If I recall correctly, that board actually spun off this board back in 1999 or so. Most of the originals had a good relationship with us and respected UConn. Somewhere things went bad and I can't even go over there. It's toxic. Anyway, this turned into a tangent. But my point is that I'll feel mixed emotions if we join the ACC. Relief and sadness.

My guess is the relationship turned toxic around the time when UConn won 2 additional NCAA championships, made 3 Final Four's since Syracuse first and only this decade, and beat Syracuse like 6 out of 7 years in football.

And I agree completely with you. I wouldn't wish this conference instability on anyone. This has been hell on the fans of the schools dealing with this since 2003. The lack of anything resembling compassion to the schools waiting and hoping just shows how some of the fans are just as heartless and cold as the people driving this whole money grab.

 

[businesslawyer]

Frankly, I don't get why the SU board is so anti-UConn..

You don't? Because while we were winning three national titles to their one, which they could just barely tolerate, we also decided to beat them five straight years in football.

 

[ctchamps]

I *really* want an invitation to the ACC. But if and when we get one, I will feel relief rather than elation. I find it BIZARRE how gleeful Syracuse fans have been throughout all of this. Some of it is due to some weird schadenfraude, I guess. I don't really understand why their primary emotion wouldn't be sadness at the downfall of the Big East. How screwed up is it that I can't walk from my office to the Garden on a Wednesday or Thursday to watch the BET? How pathetic is it that our conference (should we join the ACC) will revolve around Tobacco Road? Gross. I would never in a million years taunt Georgetown fans about getting left behind. It's all very strange. Frankly, I don't get why the SU board is so anti-UConn. If I recall correctly, that board actually spun off this board back in 1999 or so. Most of the originals had a good relationship with us and respected UConn. Somewhere things went bad and I can't even go over there. It's toxic. Anyway, this turned into a tangent. But my point is that I'll feel mixed emotions if we join the ACC. Relief and sadness. It will be a great basketball conference but the Big East was a great basketball conference, one in which UConn has been the big dog.

Well stated. The hatred is probably the envy. When UConn and the Cuse were equal then there was a polite rivalry and admiration. But UConn ran away with things in men's bb and the football program overtook the Cuse. That didn't sit well with their fans.

 

[uconndogs]

You don't? Because while we were winning three national titles to their one, which they could just barely tolerate, we also decided to beat them five straight years in football.

BANG! hammer on nail

And they know that on a level playing field of conference affiliation UCONN will own the Orange.

 

[LRock34]

Do you mean UConn vs BC in football or basketball?

For basketall I don't think any non-BC person has ever purposefully flown to watch a BC Basketball game because they are mediocre. Renewing that game/series 'rivalry' will be a letdown. Part* of BC's motivation to move to the ACC was they were getting their a$$es kicked by UConn basektball and they did not want to see the same thing happen in football. Yes it might be nice to re-establish dominance in hoops over BC again, but its not a rivalry if its one-sided.

* I know BC had other reasons and in retrospect even if they started the era of shifting/ruining conferences they do deserve some credit for being out in front of it and landing safely & securely. I.e. Benedict Arnorld would have a better rep if we were still an English colony...

Football of course.