@
mauconnfan and @
upstater.
Great points about energy.
I've observed generating energy isn't always easy. I believe we can say with some confidence that it is easy to affect positive thinking and therefore suck out our ability to generate positive energy. (One of the reasons I love the hire of Diaco and KO is that they are not energy vampires.)
The beauty of the Boneyard or any forum is that we can easily glimpse the range of human behavior and how particular situations impact us.
I read commentary in this forum to learn about my passion, the UConn Huskies. But I also read what is posted to learn about our reactions to situations. It's obvious from our responses that many people struggle to stay positive when there is adversity. I'm not condemning people for not being stoic. I'm pointing out that if we, as passive observers, are struggling to maintain a positive mindset, it should be easy for us to understand that players will struggle as well when things start to go wrong. Why do we insist they do something most of us can't do?
Team play requires a delicate balance between an individual's abilities and a reliance on others. It is easy to upset the balance of optimum performance when one is dependent only on oneself such as in the sports of tennis or golf. The balance of optimum performance is much easier to disturb when an individual is reliant on others to succeed. The expression a "chain is as strong as it's weakest link" is very evident in observing a team sport such as basket ball. If we have quite a divergent range of opinions about players and teams physical skills, which we observe, it is obvious will have an even greater range of opinions about the state of players minds, which we can't observe directly.
Kemba has the magical ability to ignore his teams weakness and generate passion in spite of those weaknesses. But he is the overwhelming exception to the rule. The vast majority of us cannot do that.
Bazz is almost on the opposite end of the spectrum. Bazz is impacted when the team underperforms. And it isn't because he's selfish. Just the opposite. It is more important for Shabazz to help others succeed than the average sports player. He takes it personally when his teammates struggle. He feels he's failed them. Unfortunately when that happens he gets down on himself, which has the negative consequence of impacting his team mates who look up to him. And then he goes into a spiral of getting down on himself for starting the cycle. Even the unsophisticated among us Boneyarders with regards to human behavior, observe this and want him not to be impacted when things go wrong. Of course it's easy to see what others need to do. It's easy to insist others change even when we are unable to do it ourselves.
Personally I like both Kemba's and Bazz's personalities and what they bring to the game. We are very lucky to have had leadership with both of these widely divergent personalities. We've seen that Kemba's skills and personality resulted in a national title. Shabazz can not be expected to accomplish that result by becoming Kemba. He's a different player, a much better passer and shooter, but not as strong at driving to the basket. And he's much more invested with how his team mates perform than Kemba. In summary there are advantages and disadvantages with each of these guys.
I've isolated just one player, Bazz, on this team. If more and more players develop, and maximize their skills, the group will perform better. That will generate more excitement and hence more optimizing of skills and play. If this team can get just slight improvement with a couple of players, it is my opinion, that Bazz can take that slight development and help the players develop quicker than Kemba could. Where Kemba could work in spite of major deficiencies with the team, Bazz can't. But if a team reaches a certain point of development, Bazz can get more out of the team than Kemba. It will be interesting to see if this team can get pass this thresh hold.
This team is composed of a lot of players who want to play perfectly. When a perfectionist makes a mistake, one of two things happen. The optimum is they recognize the mistake, work on it, and not let it impact the overall performance. On the other hand DD, OC, TO and to a lesser extent, LK go into funks when they make mistakes. NG is hesitant to put himself into situations that could cause him to make mistakes, but he gets over them quickly. SN and RB can get into funks but get themselves out of it easier than the first group. AB, is more like Kemba. PN is probably as well.
I love the way KO is handling this group. I don't know if he consciously examines personalities or whether he is one of those gifted people who instinctually knows people and how to develop them. But he's handling these guys as good as any coach reasonably can. Personally I'm glad he hasn't given up on OC. I'm making a wager of a water balloon with you guys that OC will be an important contributor before this season is over.