Huskyforlife
Akokbouk
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 12,618
- Reaction Score
- 52,303
when Geno got the T, that was a body on body block. nothing wrong there.
Except for the complete takedown of Faris's left arm. Oh, and the body-on-body contact, which, last time I checked, was a fould.when Geno got the T, that was a body on body block. nothing wrong there.
when Geno got the T, that was a body on body block. nothing wrong there.
She did not take down her left arm. And regular body on body is not a foul, otherwise every post up would be a foulExcept for the complete takedown of Faris's left arm. Oh, and the body-on-body contact, which, last time I checked, was a fould.
LOL. SMHwhen Geno got the T, that was a body on body block. nothing wrong there.
Explain how its a foulLOL. SMH
She did not take down her left arm. And regular body on body is not a foul, otherwise every post up would be a foul
No, I don't want to waste my time. However, you should try and explain how it was not a foul to the announcers, the ESPN half time crew, and the other multitudes who saw it differently.Explain how its a foul
She did not take down her left arm. And regular body on body is not a foul, otherwise every post up would be a foul
ummm body on body contact with a swat at the shooter's arm is a foul.. Were you watching with both eyes closed?Explain how its a foul
Cute that Dee Kantner has taken on a UConn handle and is posting on the Boneyard. That can be the only explanation for this post.when Geno got the T, that was a body on body block. nothing wrong there.
Because she completely displaced Kelly from her line and knocked her out of bounds. Basic rule.Explain how its a foul
when Geno got the T, that was a body on body block. nothing wrong there.
who?Cute that Dee Kantner has taken on a UConn handle and is posting on the Boneyard. That can be the only explanation for this post.
We aren't buying it, Dee. Neither did Geno, or the game announcers or the in-studio announcers.
honestly I would if I could. It was hilarious how bad they thought the call was.No, I don't want to waste my time. However, you should try and explain how it was not a foul to the announcers, the ESPN half time crew, and the other multitudes who saw it differently.
It was a block. I was using the post up as an example for what body on body means and why's its not a foulThat wasn't a post up, that was a drive. That wasn't body on body, that was contact instigated by the defender violating the law of verticality. I thought you were kidding.
LMAOYou are absolutely correct. It wasn't a foul.
It was a mugging.
It was a block. I was using the post up as an example for what body on body means and why's its not a foul
Why would I make a thread if I did not see the play?It's clear that you either don't know the rules or weren't even watching the play.
Because the men's side has nothing to hold your interest?Why would I make a thread if I did not see the play?
LMAO
Explain how its a foul