BigBird
Et In Hoc Signo Vinces
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 3,849
- Reaction Score
- 10,566
I agree with those who have said or implied that the Huskies played their "B" game. There were too many bunnies and layups that cost points. Perimeter defense was streaky at best. Lou did well at times, but sometimes was slow to rotate to the corners, which left UT some open looks for 3. Good energy from her though. UConn gave up open drives to the rim too often. Again, some of these were missed help assignments.
And, to be honest about it, there were just too many 50/50 balls that bounced away to become 10/90 balls. Several UT rebounds were frustrating as they plopped into Texas mitts on the second or third touch.
Texas played well, but the 21 point MOV could easily have been 31. But 21 looks acceptable at this point. Big of me, right?
Final thought: Some of the nervous-nellie BY responses to this game were probably posted because the team that trashed MSU didn't really show up against Texas. I'm guessing the coaches noticed this discrepancy and will address it.
The key of all keys is remarkably simple (but not easy). UConn needs to play its best games for the next 80 minutes. Then they head back to see the White House again.
And, to be honest about it, there were just too many 50/50 balls that bounced away to become 10/90 balls. Several UT rebounds were frustrating as they plopped into Texas mitts on the second or third touch.
Texas played well, but the 21 point MOV could easily have been 31. But 21 looks acceptable at this point. Big of me, right?
Final thought: Some of the nervous-nellie BY responses to this game were probably posted because the team that trashed MSU didn't really show up against Texas. I'm guessing the coaches noticed this discrepancy and will address it.
The key of all keys is remarkably simple (but not easy). UConn needs to play its best games for the next 80 minutes. Then they head back to see the White House again.
