We may never know how many players we lose because of our conference. I don't remember UConn being seriously involved with as many top players and we'll lose out on a lot more than we'll sign. It is simply how the numbers work. I agree on the weak conference schedule but we seem to taking the right approach by playing as many high profile teams on our out of conference schedule. Memphis under the Squid recruited well by taking this approach and we need to add even more top teams to our schedule. If we can do that then we will be fine.
Basketball only was a bad idea in the old BE and it is a bad idea now.
We've gone head to head with other programs many times during JC's career with lots of top recruits and often struck out. JC never really got that type of recruiting edge we expected after each of his championships. It's not that he recruited badly. As Fishy pointed out there were many top twenty classes. But JC very rarely won the recruiting battles going up against Kansas, Duke, North Carolina, UCLA, Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan State and even Syracuse. So the BE conference and the national successes didn't give him an edge against these universities.
Hence the debate about getting a "better" recruiter. The advocation of this isn't wrong. But there are some serious considerations brought up in this thread that haven't been addressed.
Do we know these top recruiters in other programs are above board? Are their connections to handlers about relationships or is there something more shady going on?
Do we know if JC's inability to win the head to head wars with the other top universities was the result of not having a better recruiter, or a result of his personality turning away those type of recruits?
Are we sure that KO won't be winning more and more of these head to head battles as time goes on?
Separate from allegations of cheating, can we be sure that getting one of those top notch recruiters doesn't create a problem for the program if that recruiter leaves the program? I imagine that Pitt will suffer for several years because "Slice" left them.
And as
@upstater has pointed out is there some disadvantage to getting kids who prefer to be coddled vs. kids who are hungry to develop. Would getting an "uber" recruiter, increase the chances of getting "coddled" recruits?
I don't put faith in any human being. But I do have confidence in KO. If, as time goes on, he thinks there is a deficiency with UConn's recruiting, and/or if he feels the need to pull back from some of the recruitment process, he'll address it. I think he will take into consideration some of the concerns people are proposing and try to address it the best way he can.