Huskyforlife
Akokbouk
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 12,188
- Reaction Score
- 49,536
Yes, yes, and yes. But he's from Illinois and is probably going to end up going back homeIs he a guard and can he handle the ball and shoot???
Never say never. At the very least, it's exciting to see us in the mix of one of the elite transfers.Yes, yes, and yes. But he's from Illinois and is probably going to end up going back home
agreed. or AJ starts at the point, hawk at the 2, shannon at the 3....idk.I'm not super familiar with his game but the low rebounding numbers concern me a bit - what role would he play for us? Need Hawkins to start at the 2 next year...and AJ will start at the 3. I guess you could slide AJ to the 4 and Shannon could start at the 3, but we would need him to bang a little bit more on the boards for that to work.
Why not bothRather have a pg who can create his own shot & facilitate first
I really don’t think AJ can be a permanent PG yet…can he run the point a bit? Sure. But I don’t feel comfortable with him as the PG without another true PG on the floor.agreed. or AJ starts at the point, hawk at the 2, shannon at the 3....idk.
If it's possible then yesWhy not both
Not a prototypical PG for sure. A/TO ratio barely on positive side. Averages 25 minutes now, and less than that in first 2 years, so would give minutes for bench to develop.Is he a guard and can he handle the ball and shoot???
lets say we got shannon. that would mean hawk is our 2, shannon is our 3 and sanogo is our 5. so is it better for aj to play the 1 or 4?I really don’t think AJ can be a permanent PG yet…can he run the point a bit? Sure. But I don’t feel comfortable with him as the PG without another true PG on the floor.