- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 25,908
- Reaction Score
- 69,788
Purdue Maryland Texas LSU NcSt ODU have gotten to final 4s with multiple coachesLaTech is the only school with championships under two coaches.
(+ UCLA Rutgers if counting AIAW)
Purdue Maryland Texas LSU NcSt ODU have gotten to final 4s with multiple coachesLaTech is the only school with championships under two coaches.
Nice.Illogical? Uhhhhh
So you think a coach at a
High academic school wouldn’t ever want
Employment at her
Alma mater??
She's not (she's said it plenty of times before), and the ONLY way that I could see her considering it is if Kim Caldwell sinks the program to the point where she would feel compelled (for the sake of Pat Summitt's legacy) to jump in and save it. And even then, she'd be relying heavily on her assistant coaches to show her the ropes. She's got some friends in the biz who probably would help her, if it came to that.Wonder if Candace Parker has any interest in coaching? I'm sure she's talks about it. Good communicator and obviously a lot of gravitas.
South Carolina made the 1980 AIAW Final Four.Purdue Maryland Texas LSU NcSt ODU have gotten to final 4s with multiple coaches
(+ UCLA Rutgers if counting AIAW)
Vanderbilt not there yet but on the cusp, maybeNot sure we really have a blue blood program in WBB.
Mainly just have coaching legacies at this point.
There isn't really yet a program that has two hall of fame tenures. I'm not thinking of it anyway.
Feel like you need at least one career tournament victory to be on the cusp of the Hall of Fame.Vanderbilt not there yet but on the cusp, maybe
Two Halll of Fame tenures? Only one school.Not sure we really have a blue blood program in WBB.
Mainly just have coaching legacies at this point.
There isn't really yet a program that has two hall of fame tenures. I'm not thinking of it anyway.
OK, on the cusp of the cuspFeel like you need at least one career tournament victory to be on the cusp of the Hall of Fame.
I think that this is a level-headed and fair take. Despite some recent missteps, Tennessee could finish above 0.500 with a win on Senior Day against Vanderbilt. That would give them a better SEC record than last season and would give them their signature win for the season. I'm not expecting it, but I won't be shocked if it does happen.I've seen people describe Tennessee as in a downward spiral. I understand why they would say that but I think the situation is a little more complicated. I would use a roller coaster metaphor and that may even apply within games. As Eric noted, the first half of the UConn game and the second half were very different. How much of that is Tennessee how much of that is UConn?
The TAMU loss was clearly a low point, but note that TAMU is doing better recently. They managed to lose to number 67 Missouri by double digits in January, but responded to beat a better team number 62 Auburn by 18 points in February, and follow that up with three more wins, one of which, Arkansas, was expected but Mississippi State not so much. I'd say TAMU is a little better than the ashheap some have relegated them to, but it still served as a bad loss for Tennessee.
On the other side of the ledger, a two-point last-second loss to number four Texas, seven point loss to Oklahoma are not exactly the results you expect from ateam spiraling to disaster. Even the 16 point loss to LSU is a better result than you would expect of a team not worthy of her tournament bid. For example Florida's probably just on the inside the bubble but lost by 29 to LSU.
With the exception of William and Mary, who won their conference tournament, but had a losing record, the team with the fewest wins the tournament last year had 19 wins (assuming Wiki is accurate). I know some people have argued that Tennessee “should have lost” the games that they played against higher ranked teams recently, but they also have an embarrassing loss to A&M. I personally think they should consider themselves lucky if they get an 8/9 seed. If they lose to both Vandy and in their first game of the SEC tournament, all bets are off.I think they'll do more than squeak in. By seed is a bridge too far, especially as the selection committee has more recency bias than the algorithmic rankings, but I could see them as a six or seven seed probably seven. The committee won't saddle them with the dreaded eight seed which means in matchup against the one seed in the second game.
They will not squeak in. They are nowhere close to the bubble.Tenn has had an interesting schedule:
#1 UConn
#2 UCLA
#3 SC
#4 TX
#5 Vandy
#6 LSU
#7 Oklahoma
#10 Louisville
all losses
#16 Kentucky - a win!
Let's say they are the 25th best ncaa team. With this schedule they would be expected to lose these games.
They have looked awful at times, competitive at times. Still with 4 quad 1 wins and 8-8 in SEC, they will squeak into the tournament.
For a qualifier, KY was without Teoni Key for that game as she had dislocated her elbow. She’s back and KY is playing much better with 3 strong options and two supporting options. They have pretty good top 6 so in a rematch vs TN, I am taking Kenny.Tenn has had an interesting schedule:
#1 UConn
#2 UCLA
#3 SC
#4 TX
#5 Vandy
#6 LSU
#7 Oklahoma
#10 Louisville
all losses
#16 Kentucky - a win!
Let's say they are the 25th best ncaa team. With this schedule they would be expected to lose these games.
They have looked awful at times, competitive at times. Still with 4 quad 1 wins and 8-8 in SEC, they will squeak into the tournament.
I think they'll do more than squeak in. By seed is a bridge too far, especially as the selection committee has more recency bias than the algorithmic rankings, but I could see them as a six or seven seed probably seven. The committee won't saddle them with the dreaded eight seed which means in matchup against the one seed in the second game.
Did you wander into the wrong thread perhaps?I’m bemused by the easy assumption that Vanderbilt is academically superior to UConn, or many other state schools for that matter. These sorts of judgments are typically made based on very flawed information (rankings, acceptance rates, endowments, etc) and reveal very little about the undergraduate experience. In reality, there is probably very little to distinguish Vandy from UConn (or Harvard or Stanford) as an academic experience. Of course, as a recruiting device, the value of academic reputation, however erroneous, can have a powerful influence on the decision making process of high school kids and their parents.
To get back to the topic and answer @LwrcasefaN and @TheGOAT23, a few thoughts all IMHO obviously
Tennessee fans were really distraught over the really bad Mississippi State and aTm losses. As well as the historic beatdowns at the hands of UConn and SC.
But then you look at the efforts against Texas (-2), Oklahoma (-7), and they were down 5 with about 4 minutes left in Q3. They also played UConn even for the entire first half. My point is against some tough competition, thy were competitive for long stretches, and then - I'm not sure - lost focus maybe?
People asked if she has "lost this team". I don't think so. We will see what they do against Vandy. I think Tennessee will be desperate - and if they DO lose, they will be beyond desperate to win at least one SEC tourney game to avoid going 2-10 to end their season on a 7 game losing streak.
Creme has had Tennessee as a 7 seed for a bit now, and the bracketology said it updated today, but that can't be correct. They should have dropped to 8 or 9. I don't care how strong their SOS is - their extended losing streak and record over the past 10 games has to be accounted for.
Oops. My bad, even though Vandy is technically in Tennessee. And the thread had a couple comments about Vandy.Did you wander into the wrong thread perhaps?