UCFBfan
Semi Kings of New England!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 5,873
- Reaction Score
- 11,756
I'm not upset with the addition of Temple. Especially since it's for all-sports. However, I saw this in the article in CBSsports and was a little surprised if this is true:
"The Big East initially wanted Boise State, which will join in 2013, to join this fall as West Virginia’s replacement. However, the Big East was not willing to provide the Broncos with about $10 million they needed to leave the Mountain West in football and have their Olympic sports join the WAC a year early."
So did the Big East settle for Temple to join over adding Boise a year early? What about the $20 million they just got from WVU? Why couldn't they use half of that to get Boise in a year early? Just something I found interesting. Is adding Temple the better move than adding Boise a year early? I have a feeling that they know Louisville is gone soon and wanted to get Temple before they went to the new CUSA-MWC.
"The Big East initially wanted Boise State, which will join in 2013, to join this fall as West Virginia’s replacement. However, the Big East was not willing to provide the Broncos with about $10 million they needed to leave the Mountain West in football and have their Olympic sports join the WAC a year early."
So did the Big East settle for Temple to join over adding Boise a year early? What about the $20 million they just got from WVU? Why couldn't they use half of that to get Boise in a year early? Just something I found interesting. Is adding Temple the better move than adding Boise a year early? I have a feeling that they know Louisville is gone soon and wanted to get Temple before they went to the new CUSA-MWC.