Takeaways from the Vandy game | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Takeaways from the Vandy game

Crystal Dangerfield has really grown into a star now that her shin splints and other ills have healed!
If she CAN stay healthy IMHO she will be UCONN's 3rd AA joining KLS and Pheesa on either the WBCA AA team or the AP AA team, getting herself on the HUSKIES OF HONOR!
I knew she had it in her if she can be healthy!
She's a 7'er trapped in a 5'5" body!
"You go girl!"
 
I was at the game and had great seats, four rows back where baseline meets sideline. Way closer to the action than I have ever been. Gave me greater appreciation for the physical nature of the game and the speed at which it is played. Some other random thoughts:

1. Well officiated game. Seemed like the bald ref made about 70% of the calls, though.

2. Like how CW and Megan are able to take it strong to the rim. Crystal was the best player out there with Napheesa a close second.

3. Defense seemed to really be in sync considering it was the second game of the season. Very few open looks for Vandy, switching was good and defensive boards were really good. The offense wasn't as good as the defense tonight, but it did generate open shots that we typically make. They were sharing the ball well. Shooting percentage was higher than it felt like, maybe because other than Crystal the threes weren't falling.

4. Napheesa made some shots around the rim look easy that other players would never be able to get in position to take.

5. Lou drew quite a few fouls posting up or cutting to the basket. She must get held, bumped, pushed, whacked more than any player in the country. Showed her offensive versatility on a night she couldn't get a three to drop. The shots she was getting from three were open, except one where it looked from my viewpoint that she got fouled, just off. Saw it in pregame and halftime warmups, just not dropping for her tonight.

6. ONO is going to be very good. Hopefully by March. Coombs is quick and is a good defender. I think she can contribute. Her release is unorthodox and will stand in the way of her being a consistent shooter.

7. The reserves when in together struggle on offense because they aren't able to put any pressure on the defense. But that matters little, what is more important is whether two or three can fit in with the starters for brief periods, one or two at a time. I left tonight feeling more optimistic in that regard.

8. Another reason for optimism is that the four returning starters have all upped their games from last year, and CW fits right in and can defend.
 
Last edited:
Watching the game up close gives an interesting perspective. The players are tall and fast. It seems as if there are no open spaces on the floor. I've seen some Lynx games from right behind the bench and am impressed by how big and strong Maya, Rebekkah, and Sylvia are.
 
To understand our bench and how Geno feels about it, just see the last 40 seconds of his presser / interview

Vanderbilt Post-Game

1) ONO needs to get a lot of time and gives the team something we need.
2) He is speechless and incredulous about anyone else.

Face it, There is no one else on the bench taking on the challenge of consistency.

I actually thought Molly may have turned a corner a bit but no. And this glimpse of one decent game by some bench players leading to false hope is a never ending cycle.

The bench's shooting (not giving names since it was a group effort) was really really bad. It's one thing to miss a shot by a little but it was a brickyard out there.

My new mindset is to no longer question the lack of minutes on the bench but to enjoy our starters and ONO and show our potential recruits that playing time is not an issue if you have any confidence in your play.
(MW, CW, ONO)

If Geno can steal some minutes of rest, great but I do not see anything else. :(:(:mad::mad::(:(


PS. The last 2 minutes of the presser when he was being interviewed, he had real interesting things to say about some of his historic teams from a defensive point of view and how times have changed both in the mindset of today's players as well as in the way officials are calling the game tighter.
 
Last edited:
I will say again. I don't care at all whether we go undefeated. I believe we have won 5 NC without being undefeated.

If we lose to ND in December, but win the NC, who cares?

We just need to keep getting better, and find 2 players who can contribute off the bench. But, we know that already. :rolleyes:
 
With our OOC schedule, the bench players MUST step up for this team to play deep into March!
 
.-.
stamfordhusky said:
I'd love to see an undefeated season, but Massey actually has them going 28-2 (with rounding). Just because they are favored to win every game does not mean they are expected to win all of them.

For a more obvious example, if a team were given a 51% chance of winning each of 30 games, it would be pretty clear that no-one thought they would win all 30. In fact, in this example the team really would be expected to win only a fraction more than 30 games.
Expand ...
If we can win only a fraction more than the games we play , I will be happy! ;)
 
MilfordHusky said:
Crystal Dangerfield is the most exciting player since ... well, Moriah Jefferson.
Expand ...

it appears that CD is turning the corner towards MoJeff reliability on the offensive end.............that is really vital because it will prevent defenses from always doubling KLS on the three point line............
 
Last edited:
eebmg said:
Tougher than Geno.
Expand ...
Just trying to do the math in Stamfordhusky posting. But it would be good, eh? :D I am sure Geno is way tougher than I am!
 
.-.
While it’s still early, the one thing that stood out to me is the Huskies holding tOSU & Vandy to 29% & 25% shooting respectively. Of course these are not top tier teams, but they are P5 teams with capable players. Even when UConn is playing AAC opponents, holding a team below 30% shooting is something to celebrate.
 
huskyd said:
FYI: Massey has UConn going undefeated this season. The service has been correct for the last two years, and the Huskies spread in this one was close to Massey's prediction. May the Force be with it.
Expand ...
That's amazing. Well, I'm amazed, anyway. It's something, but let's not let it turn our heads, yes? This team is capable of being something really good by the end of the year, but thin as it is, it is one key injury away from being a "could'a-would'a-should'a" team as well. UConn-Notre Dame will be a slugfest. We'll know more then.
 
Geno's comments in his interview about the refs calling the games much tighter is right on. I was at the Oregon State game last night, and so impressed with Rueck's teams' "in your grill defense". But the number of ticky tack calls by the referees was disappointing. There is nothing better than great defense (as Geno said about some of his past teams "not allowing the other team to even get off a shot"!). I sure hope that the referees don't become the focus of the women's basketball game.
 
3 thoughts...1) Pheesa dominated every aspect of the game, I wish we ran more sets for her as she is a total mismatch for 5s. 2) Crystal scored extremely well but was too careless at times. 3) Lou going 0-5 isn't a big deal, she's honestly been heavily contested and will continue to be until opposing teams actually fear CW & MW. They have to prove themselves over and over until they gain respect. It will be tough sledding for Lou to get open shots until then. That being said, she's been great from mid-range and attacking the rim. I haven't seen the stats but I'm assuming she's been our 2nd best rebounder, which at 6'3", she needs to be. Love how her game has transformed.
 
Huskee11 said:
I was at the game and had great seats, four rows back where baseline meets sideline. Way closer to the action than I have ever been. Gave me greater appreciation for the physical nature of the game and the speed at which it is played. Some other random thoughts:

1. Well officiated game. Seemed like the bald ref made about 70% of the calls, though.

2. Like how CW and Megan are able to take it strong to the rim. Crystal was the best player out there with Napheesa a close second.

3. Defense seemed to really be in sync considering it was the second game of the season. Very few open looks for Vandy, switching was good and defensive boards were really good. The offense wasn't as good as the defense tonight, but it did generate open shots that we typically make. They were sharing the ball well. Shooting percentage was higher than it felt like, maybe because other than Crystal the threes weren't falling.

4. Napheesa made some shots around the rim look easy that other players would never be able to get in position to take.

5. Lou drew quite a few fouls posting up or cutting to the basket. She must get held, bumped, pushed, whacked more than any player in the country. Showed her offensive versatility on a night she couldn't get a three to drop. The shots she was getting from three were open, except one where it looked from my viewpoint that she got fouled, just off. Saw it in pregame and halftime warmups, just not dropping for her tonight.

6. ONO is going to be very good. Hopefully by March. Coombs is quick and is a good defender. I think she can contribute. Her release is unorthodox and will stand in the way of her being a consistent shooter.

7. The reserves when in together struggle on offense because they aren't able to put any pressure on the defense. But that matters little, what is more important is whether two or three can fit in with the starters for brief periods, one or two at a time. I left tonight feeling more optimistic in that regard.

8. Another reason for optimism is that the four returning starters have all upped their games from last year, and CW fits right in and can defend.
Expand ...
Lou got hammered several times under basket and did not fall down as she normally does. Looked like she was making an effort to stay upright and not fall into the scrum of bodies. Good news if this continues.
 
.-.
A glass full moment. The big three is equal to or greater than any other big three. Megan Walker is playing pretty. pretty good. Double figure in scoring and can rebound. Much stronger this year and seems to know she can compete with anyone. The 5th starter, CW, is putting together a nice all-around effort in each game. She scores 8, rebounds 3, assists 3 and steals 3 in this game. I want to see the 4th and 5th player on any other team contain these two players. Geno seems to know that ONo and Coombs have to play 15 to 18 minutes a game to develop and help down the stretch. Irwin and Batoully will fight it out for the 8th spot. I am enjoying the games and I like that ND is #1 right now because the pressure if off UConn a tad.
 
go back and watch the game replay, with about 0:40 left in the game, the camera zooms in on Geno. You can read his lips, he is absolutely ripping someone. Who?
 
hoopsfan22 said:
If I'm Geno I play ONO and Coombs as much as possible. Let those two come in for Collier and KLS. KLS is starting to remind me a bit of a player like Stewie who could go from sleeping to knocking down shots in ten minutes. She's really starting to look like a pro out there in the way she has an all around game and ability to score in a number of ways on all parts of the floor.
Expand ...
Have to agree. Coombs, in particular, needs work. Olivia will develop pretty quickly....certainly she needs more strength ( hands and grip of ball, in particular ).....but she looks like a star in the making. Coombs still looks tentative, and that will erode with playing time and confidence. Her limitation; she has no our=tside shot. But if 10 minutes is all we need...and she handles the ball, passes decisively, plays defense, and drives to the hoop , she can be a contributor.
 
I isolated a few times on Kyla when she was in. Kyla on defense always took the first fake, and then the offensive player blew right by her. I love Kyla as much as anyone on this board, but after seeing two such blow-bys, she was pulled and didn't come back in until clean up time, I think. She didn't move her feet at all on defense. And as a coaches daughter she should know she can't pass to herself when she is the inbounder. :) Maybe she just tries too hard.
 
.-.
Charliebball said:
very refreshing indeed.....of course I think Geno will be far more stingy with his substitutions once games start to get more competitive.....for now it looks like ONO, Coombs and Irwin might will make up the back end of the "Big 8"
Expand ...
As usual you nailed it. When REAL games begin subs sit more, unless they are top talent.
 
MilfordHusky said:
I thought it was a good, but not great effort. It was basically a 2-fer, and shooting percentages were .559 and .254. Both of those were very good. I thought we were just a little sloppy and slow to loose balls. We also got very few points on true fast breaks, hence a total of only 80. Lou's shot was off from the arc, but she played well otherwise. Phee was a rebounding machine. Crystal looked as if she could drop 30 points if she wanted. Meg scored well, but Phee didn't allow her or anyone else many rebounds. Christyn had some points, rebounds, and assists. I think she could have been a little more aggressive again. Liv showed flashes on the offensive end and Mikayla on the defensive end. We beat Vandy by about twice as many as N.C. State did. For the second game of the season, I'm pretty happy.
Expand ...
CW as a Frosh impresses the be-jabbers out of me. I think she defers too much but she is not completely comfortable. One thing is certain she has played a lot of basketball and knows she can do anything she wants on the floor, yet she is a team player. Love that kid. Megan is not losing love from me they are 2 different players.
 
BroadwayVa said:
As usual you nailed it. When REAL games begin subs sit more, unless they are top talent.
Expand ...

if he actually plays at least seven and perhaps eight at some point before garbage time against good competition that will be encouraging and frankly a necessity in the long run.........
 
On one possession, Christyn took 3 or 4 dribbles from the right side of the floor across the lane and put up a jumper from about 8-10'. She has that shot pretty much whenever she wants it. And it will usually go in.
 
some thoughts of the game:
a. our starting 5 is really really good and you can see the potential for them to be great. They need to sharpen on the passes and defense but it looks like it will come as we get deeper into the season.
b. A serious injury to any of the starting 5 will basically close the hopes for a final 4 run as there is such a steep difference between the starting 5 and the players on the bench.
c. to my eyes only Coombs (good defense) and ONO are capable in contributing to a championship level team.
d. the lack of development in Bent and Irwin games is depressing.
e. the team is very small and I'm curious to see how they'll do against big and skilled posts (Baylor, ND)
 
Last edited:
stamfordhusky said:
I'd love to see an undefeated season, but Massey actually has them going 28-2 (with rounding). Just because they are favored to win every game does not mean they are expected to win all of them.

For a more obvious example, if a team were given a 51% chance of winning each of 30 games, it would be pretty clear that no-one thought they would win all 30. In fact, in this example the team really would be expected to win only a fraction more than 30 games.
Expand ...

Well, in addition to the percentages, Massey also projects a score. In those scores, UConn wins every game. The lowest percentage is 59; but, you're right, some games are as close as 3pts. Two years ago we were speculating on this board about the Huskies losing as many as 8 games. That was the year we lost the Big 3. It was also the year Phee was crazy good--and UConn won 'em all. Anyone for deja vu?
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,934
Messages
4,545,514
Members
10,426
Latest member
kmbazz15


Top Bottom