- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Messages
- 1,577
- Reaction Score
- 3,730
I believe most of our tougher games are on the road. Going undefeated would be quite unexpected but gratifying.
Against OSU, the bench was playing against the OSU starters and actually increased the lead. I’m not going to criticize the bench for not scoring enough.very refreshing indeed.....of course I think Geno will be far more stingy with his substitutions once games start to get more competitive.....for now it looks like ONO, Coombs and Irwin might will make up the back end of the "Big 8"
I know thasright!I thought that Justine was in mid-season form.
Excellent point. If a team were given a 51% chance of winning each of 30 games, they would have only a minuscule chance of going undefeated (.00000017%). If they had a 95% chance of winning each game, their chances of going undefeated would be only 21%. And at a 99% chance for each game, the odds of them going undefeated would still only be 74%.I'd love to see an undefeated season, but Massey actually has them going 28-2 (with rounding). Just because they are favored to win every game does not mean they are expected to win all of them.
For a more obvious example, if a team were given a 51% chance of winning each of 30 games, it would be pretty clear that no-one thought they would win all 30. In fact, in this example the team really would be expected to win only a fraction more than 30 games.
Excellent point. If a team were given a 51% chance of winning each of 30 games, they would have only a minuscule chance of going undefeated (.00000017%). If they had a 95% chance of winning each game, their chances of going undefeated would be only 21%. And at a 99% chance for each game, the odds of them going undefeated would still only be 74%.
This is why it's so amazing that UConn has had so many undefeated seasons. More than just "probability" going on here....
If we can win only a fraction more than the games we play , I will be happy!I'd love to see an undefeated season, but Massey actually has them going 28-2 (with rounding). Just because they are favored to win every game does not mean they are expected to win all of them.
For a more obvious example, if a team were given a 51% chance of winning each of 30 games, it would be pretty clear that no-one thought they would win all 30. In fact, in this example the team really would be expected to win only a fraction more than 30 games.
Crystal Dangerfield is the most exciting player since ... well, Moriah Jefferson.
If we can win only a fraction more than the games we play , I will be happy!
it appears that CW is turning the corner towards MoJeff reliability on the offensive end...that is really vital because it will prevent defenses from always doubling KLS on the three point line..
Just trying to do the math in Stamfordhusky posting. But it would be good, eh? I am sure Geno is way tougher than I am!Tougher than Geno.
I am guessing Crystal, not CW (yet) ?
That's amazing. Well, I'm amazed, anyway. It's something, but let's not let it turn our heads, yes? This team is capable of being something really good by the end of the year, but thin as it is, it is one key injury away from being a "could'a-would'a-should'a" team as well. UConn-Notre Dame will be a slugfest. We'll know more then.FYI: Massey has UConn going undefeated this season. The service has been correct for the last two years, and the Huskies spread in this one was close to Massey's prediction. May the Force be with it.
Crystal Dangerfield is the most exciting player since ... well, Moriah Jefferson.
Lou got hammered several times under basket and did not fall down as she normally does. Looked like she was making an effort to stay upright and not fall into the scrum of bodies. Good news if this continues.I was at the game and had great seats, four rows back where baseline meets sideline. Way closer to the action than I have ever been. Gave me greater appreciation for the physical nature of the game and the speed at which it is played. Some other random thoughts:
1. Well officiated game. Seemed like the bald ref made about 70% of the calls, though.
2. Like how CW and Megan are able to take it strong to the rim. Crystal was the best player out there with Napheesa a close second.
3. Defense seemed to really be in sync considering it was the second game of the season. Very few open looks for Vandy, switching was good and defensive boards were really good. The offense wasn't as good as the defense tonight, but it did generate open shots that we typically make. They were sharing the ball well. Shooting percentage was higher than it felt like, maybe because other than Crystal the threes weren't falling.
4. Napheesa made some shots around the rim look easy that other players would never be able to get in position to take.
5. Lou drew quite a few fouls posting up or cutting to the basket. She must get held, bumped, pushed, whacked more than any player in the country. Showed her offensive versatility on a night she couldn't get a three to drop. The shots she was getting from three were open, except one where it looked from my viewpoint that she got fouled, just off. Saw it in pregame and halftime warmups, just not dropping for her tonight.
6. ONO is going to be very good. Hopefully by March. Coombs is quick and is a good defender. I think she can contribute. Her release is unorthodox and will stand in the way of her being a consistent shooter.
7. The reserves when in together struggle on offense because they aren't able to put any pressure on the defense. But that matters little, what is more important is whether two or three can fit in with the starters for brief periods, one or two at a time. I left tonight feeling more optimistic in that regard.
8. Another reason for optimism is that the four returning starters have all upped their games from last year, and CW fits right in and can defend.