sdhusky
1972,73 & 98 Boneyard Poster of the Year
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 9,272
- Reaction Score
- 6,556
There has been so much about this "rivalry" and from where I sit, these rivalries fall into a couple buckets:
1) Our battles with Syracuse and Duke on a big stage. For titles. For first place. For final fours.
2) Regional little brothers who think they can take on their big brother. It's more of a nuisance based rivalry than a battle for any sort of supremacy. First it was UMass. We spanked their fanny enough and they eventually faded away. More recently it was Providence. And with those annual matchups now gone, all they have is "We played you tough most of the time!!!". They'll now fade away as well and whatever conference we are in, some other little brother will try to take us on.
The issue with a rivalry is that you have to play an important game that you really care about.
Has the PC game ever been any more important than Seton Hall or DePaul or USF? Not really.
Last weekend was the first time I really cared about beating PC but it has more to do with timing of the game and circumstances around the game (last game, injuries, no post season) than it was about PC.
Now, on PC's side, every game against UCONN is important. More important than DePaul or Seton Hall or USF.