Waquoit
Mr. Positive
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 33,332
- Reaction Score
- 87,297
Pernetti didn't do anything - you could have answered the phone ... just as adeptly as he did.
That's what John Toner did and he's on the Huskies of Honor wall.
Pernetti didn't do anything - you could have answered the phone ... just as adeptly as he did.
That and the little detail about hiring two guys named Jim and Geno.That's what John Toner did and he's on the Huskies of Honor wall.
he wanted Rice fired, but followed university policy and legal came to a different conclusion.
Certainly a possibility that I can not deny.Well Mike, we may never know the exact truth but I'm inclined to believe just the opposite. I think Pernetti was so engrossed in the B1G realignment that he asked legal to give him cover so he wouldnt have to fire Rice and all that would have divulged. So they provide a plausible HR reason for him to retain Rice and downplay what the tape displays (Pres doesn't even view it) and with a $50,000 fine and 3 game suspension, no one even has to hear why--not any faculty at RU or any of the B1G officials. Life is good, until Murdoch goes to Espn.
Given both Pernetti and Barchi are passing the buck and blaming the lawyers, you know they're both full of it. Now in fairness to Pernetti, he did make an awkward statement about his responsibility for failing to fire Rice on the spot, but that was followed later by blaming the lawyers. Think about it for a second - the athletic director wants to fire a coach for cause, with video evidence, and he's worried about the coach suing? or having to settle with the assistant for what, a couple hundred grand? Give me a break. Both of these men exhibited failure of leadership, they're both passing the buck, and at least one of them was lying or covering up at some point. Now... will Pernetti be a competent AD somewhere else? I guess. But he probably won't be trusted by whatever president / trustees hire him.Gotta say that was good.
Guess I'll clarify- I believe his statement in his resignation that he wanted Rice fired, but followed university policy and legal came to a different conclusion. IF that's all true... Then that's why I feel he's not nearly as toxic. If he's full of it... Well, different story.
Given both Pernetti and Barchi are passing the buck and blaming the lawyers, you know they're both full of it. Now in fairness to Pernetti, he did make an awkward statement about his responsibility for failing to fire Rice on the spot, but that was followed later by blaming the lawyers. Think about it for a second - the athletic director wants to fire a coach for cause, with video evidence, and he's worried about the coach suing? or having to settle with the assistant for what, a couple hundred grand? Give me a break. Both of these men exhibited failure of leadership, they're both passing the buck, and at least one of them was lying or covering up at some point. Now... will Pernetti be a competent AD somewhere else? I guess. But he probably won't be trusted by whatever president / trustees hire him.
Well you have to take in account that Manuel is a rock star.Perneti is a huge upgrade over Manuel, even with this whole mess.
Who actually interviewed this idiot Manuel and said, "Yeah, this is our guy. This is the face our athletic program."
Yes that's how it wound up going down, but Pernetti is claiming he made the decision to fire Rice on the spot and then was overruled or sidelined by the legal process."While Rice was fired, Barchi took pains Friday to stress he had not been terminated for cause. Under the terms of his contract, he is eligible to receive 75 percent of what he would have been paid under the final two years of his contract. Rice was to be paid $700,000 this year, and $750,000 over the next — not including incentive bonuses. His payout is expected to exceed $1.1 million."
That and the little detail about hiring two guys named Jim and Geno.
Yes that's how it wound up going down, but Pernetti is claiming he made the decision to fire Rice on the spot and then was overruled or sidelined by the legal process.