It appeared that there was more of a comfort level for Z and Meg, like the game “slowed down” for them and AEH is starting to come along also.With Lou out, this was a great, productive game for the Huskies. It gave the bench, mainly Stevens and Megan, guaranteed extended time. It both created pressure to perform, yet reduced it, knowing they would probably not be pulled at the slightest error. It also gave the remainder of the bench additional time against a quality oponent.
Not if someone fouls out.If a game is tied at the end of 3 periods the ONLY people(barring injury or foul trouble) seeing the floor are the 5 starters and Stevens.
You may be waiting awhile.Good post.Let's get a game tied at the end of 3 periods; then, see who Geno puts in.
Not if someone fouls out.
Here are three things that I noticed about Geno's substitution pattern against Maryland, focusing on the players nearer to the end of the bench:
There is a pattern here: Andra and Molly were less highly rated coming out of high school than Mikayla and Lexi, and it is easy to see that they are less athletic than Mikayla and Lexi. Despite being less talented, they seem to have absorbed "the system" much better than their more talented peers, and as a result they are winning in the "tortoise vs. hare" race for floor time.
- I think (as some predicted) that Andra has now moved up past Molly on the backcourt depth chart. She entered this game ahead of Molly and played more minutes. To my layman's eyes, she didn't do much to call attention to herself, other than making two 3's that Maryland was happy to give her. But Molly very clearly is still the second guard off the bench -- Mikayla and Lexi are not in the mix except for garbage time.
- Even with the shortage of front court bodies, Kyla did not get in the game until the 4th quarter. That tells me that despite whatever sophomore leap may have occurred, Geno still does not trust her. He appears to trust her less than Molly, in fact, based on the minutes.
- And here's the thing that jumped out at me as I was putting my coat on to leave: With perhaps a minute left in the game, Geno pulled Mikayla out of the game and sent Molly back in to replace her. Why would he do that, especially when she had not made any mistakes that were obvious to this layman? She must have been playing "outside the sandbox" in a way that wasn't visible to me, and Geno pulled her to make an emphatic point that this needs to change.
Actually, I would go further and say that for Mikayla it has to be that kind of a problem, whereas for Lexi it is a different problem -- presumably conditioning. (And for both of them, undoubtedly defensive play is an issue.) However, I'm still a bit puzzled by Lexi's minimal minutes, because in every single game where she has played in the last few minutes, she has made good plays. Today she recovered an offensive rebound and made a difficult pass to the top of the circle to save a possession. In other games, she has taken a charge, drawn a foul on a drive, and made a couple of shots. That is hard to do after sitting for the first 36-38 minutes of game. I can only guess that Geno thinks Lexi should be doing better, and he isn't going to play her until she performs as well as he thinks she can.
Freshman year with Geno is like the 10th Circle of hell. He's the devil and CD, Shea and Marisa are Cerberus, the three-headed dog (not a Husky) guarding the gates. For most, survival is the only realistic aspiration.Thank you for injecting realistic expectations.
You may be waiting awhile.
Freshman year with Geno is like the 10th Circle of hell. He's the devil and CD, Shea and Marisa are Cerberus, the three-headed dog (not a Husky) guarding the gates. For most, survival is the only realistic aspiration.
Of course, high school ratings do not prove anything about a player’s “relative worth to the team”. At best, they are a measure of athletic talent — which is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for helping a team like UConn to win basketball games. Ratings don’t measure a player’s motivation, coachability, work ethic, or intelligence — and all of those things are potentially useful in contributing to a team’s success on the basketball court.
My point was that my personal (totally amateur) eye test tells me that both Lexi and Mikayla are more athletically talented than Molly or Andra — and I assume that is what the high school rating pundits saw, which is why they were rated more highly. But at this point in their careers, Molly and especially Andra are making a bigger contribution towards UConn’s success on the court than their more talented teammates. And I think it has to do with all of those qualities (to which one might add “maturity”) that the ratings don’t capture.
That is true today, but it may not be true in the future. If Lexi works herself into shape and if Mikayla comes to understand the offense and defense that she is supposed to play, then their athletic talent will probably move them ahead of Molly and Andra. But that is the future (we hope), not the present.
3 or 4 Friday also. One ball rolled from her to a Cal player in front of Geno.Who doesn't like the determination of Molly, but today she did make some dumb TOers.
High School and a weak league.Andra Espinoza-Hunter is less talented than Mikayla Coombes and Lexi Gordon? Andra scored almost 1,000 points in her senior season at Ossining. Hardly lacking talent.
Not if someone fouls out.
High School and a weak league.
Again high school in a weak league!She wasn't the #16 ranked player in the country by accident.
Again high school in a weak league!
I think most shall agree with you, as we say what you saw. I liked the fourth quarter , they lost some points mostly on missing defensive stops--but unlike teams of the past, they nearly maintained the score--if not for T.O.'s may have led the MD players. All is all not a bad job. Geno has to preach Defense, and lack thereof, that's his job. He looks at what they didn't do--we as fans have the option to comment positively on what they did do.Two points that I believe have not been made here: first, Geno has called this group of young players the "worst defenders" he has ever had (referring to the 4th qtr.); and, second, the 4th quarter was used to give the kids some experience, to rest the regulars for a busy week ahead, and to keep the score w/in reason. I've been saying since the first game that the last quarter has been disappointing, leaving me with a down feeling despite the wins. The only cure for these let-downs will be a competitive game in which UConn needs to play its starting rotation. As for the young subs: maybe a reasonable objective would be to keep the lead they inherit exactly as it is when they enter the game. Don't add to it, just keep things as they are. By my reckoning, the Huskies have been 40 points better than anyone played so far.
"awhile," means a short timeYou may be waiting awhile.
I don't think the current lack of love (relevant playing time) for the frosh, other than Megan, is indicative of much. They are getting used to major college basketball game speed. We've all seen this movie before. Sit back and enjoy the progress.
Thought that was Natalie’s position last year and beyondGood grief. Now that Saniya has graduated, I guess Molly is the designated punching bag.
Molly has 5 turnovers in three games, same as Napheesa and Kia. Gabby leads the team with 15.
I was talking about 995 pts in HS and again a weak league! You brought up rankings not me!What high school league she is in has virtually nothing to do with her ranking. All of those evaluations are made during AAU and Team USA games/tryouts when they can see players play against the very best competition.