Stupid Basketball Question | The Boneyard

Stupid Basketball Question

UConnSportsGuy

Addicted to all things UCONN!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
5,738
After last nights “Basketball Game” it got me thinking: What is the history/reason for why players foul out in Basketball?

It is the only sport I can think of that forces their stars to miss the most important parts of the game (many times due to poor officiating).

Imagine if Kelce was disqualified in the playoffs after 3 offensive pass interference calls, or Gordie Howe was in the locker room in the 3rd due to 2 slashing penalties, or Roger Clemens kicked out of the World Series in the 4th inning because of two balks?

We nearly didn’t win our 2004 Championship due to Okafor having to sit out the majority of the Duke game.

There are penalties if a player commits a foul (free throws or possession for the other team). So why is it necessary to disqualify a player if they reach 5 fouls (or 6 in the NBA)?

I’ve never really thought about it before, but it seems so ridiculous when you sit back and think about it.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,673
Reaction Score
96,253
After last nights “Basketball Game” it got me thinking: What is the history/reason for why players foul out in Basketball?

It is the only sport I can think of that forces their stars to miss the most important parts of the game (many times due to poor officiating).

Imagine if Kelce was disqualified in the playoffs after 3 offensive pass interference calls, or Gordie Howe was in the locker room in the 3rd due to 2 slashing penalties, or Roger Clemens kicked out of the World Series in the 4th inning because of two balks?

We nearly didn’t win our 2004 Championship due to Okafor having to sit out the majority of the Duke game.

There are penalties if a player commits a foul (free throws or possession for the other team). So why is it necessary to disqualify a player if they reach 5 fouls (or 6 in the NBA)?

I’ve never really thought about it before, but it seems so ridiculous when you sit back and think about it.

You could play a 90-second drill all game if players couldn't foul out. Would you enjoy that?
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,973
Reaction Score
53,115
After last nights “Basketball Game” it got me thinking: What is the history/reason for why players foul out in Basketball?

It is the only sport I can think of that forces their stars to miss the most important parts of the game (many times due to poor officiating).

Imagine if Kelce was disqualified in the playoffs after 3 offensive pass interference calls, or Gordie Howe was in the locker room in the 3rd due to 2 slashing penalties, or Roger Clemens kicked out of the World Series in the 4th inning because of two balks?

We nearly didn’t win our 2004 Championship due to Okafor having to sit out the majority of the Duke game.

There are penalties if a player commits a foul (free throws or possession for the other team). So why is it necessary to disqualify a player if they reach 5 fouls (or 6 in the NBA)?

I’ve never really thought about it before, but it seems so ridiculous when you sit back and think about it.



 

prankster

Twister Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2011
Messages
4,346
Reaction Score
5,435
Cool idea.

I like it. Particularly the hockey approach.

Into the penalty box with you.

Now play 5 on 4 for 3 minutes.
 
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,673
Reaction Score
96,253
Havk a Shack every possession.

If the game was played this way, Donovan would get smashed before he even touched the ball. Three-point shooters would be hammered on every shot. Layups would result in broken arms.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,221
Reaction Score
21,269
that's certainly a novel suggestion as far as rule changes go... i love the college game the way it is aside from the BE refs, and there's only two changes i'd like to see at the pro level:

1) widen the court to increase the distance of the 3pt line in the corners. it's too easy of a shot now.
2) there's no rhyme or reason for 82 games. there will soon be 32 teams (16/conference). get rid of the divisions and play each team in your conference 3x (if you play a team 2x at home and 1x away it would alternate the next year) and play each team in the other conference 2x (1x home and 1x away). that's a total 77 games.
 

StllH8L8ner

You’ll get nothing and like it!
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
1,834
Reaction Score
9,689
Start every game with a round of slap fighting.
IMG_7521.gif
 
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
675
Reaction Score
3,684
Strategy would just become: wait for the other team’s poorest FT shooter to get the ball and then foul him.
 
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
1,720
Reaction Score
3,852
After last nights “Basketball Game” it got me thinking: What is the history/reason for why players foul out in Basketball?

It is the only sport I can think of that forces their stars to miss the most important parts of the game (many times due to poor officiating).

Imagine if Kelce was disqualified in the playoffs after 3 offensive pass interference calls, or Gordie Howe was in the locker room in the 3rd due to 2 slashing penalties, or Roger Clemens kicked out of the World Series in the 4th inning because of two balks?

We nearly didn’t win our 2004 Championship due to Okafor having to sit out the majority of the Duke game.

There are penalties if a player commits a foul (free throws or possession for the other team). So why is it necessary to disqualify a player if they reach 5 fouls (or 6 in the NBA)?

I’ve never really thought about it before, but it seems so ridiculous when you sit back and think about it.
Some history:

 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,517
Reaction Score
9,300
You could effectively eliminate insane amounts of fouling while still not disqualifying players from the game.

For instance, you could say that everyone gets 5 normal fouls, and then their 6th foul and beyond have the same rules as a flagrant, where there are shots and possession. Or you could just give more foul shots.

Players would definitely not foul willy-nilly, but they could still be on the court after a 5th.

Just spitballing here, so I'm not saying that is the best way or anything, but it's easy to imagine other ways besides disqualification.
 

storrsroars

Exiled in Pittsburgh
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
20,019
Reaction Score
40,140
For instance, you could say that everyone gets 5 normal fouls, and then their 6th foul and beyond have the same rules as a flagrant, where there are shots and possession. Or you could just give more foul shots.
The link in the post above yours discusses potentially better options. The goal is fewer foul shots, not more.
 
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
3,633
Reaction Score
12,993
After last nights “Basketball Game” it got me thinking: What is the history/reason for why players foul out in Basketball?

It is the only sport I can think of that forces their stars to miss the most important parts of the game (many times due to poor officiating).
Just my honest opinion but the game has evolved from ballet with a ball to gladiators with a ball. ;)
It is no different on the women's side. Do realize that in football, soccer, hockey players are ejected for unnecessary roughness. That and some are suspended from playing for periods or an entire next game.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,517
Reaction Score
9,300
The link in the post above yours discusses potentially better options. The goal is fewer foul shots, not more.
I thought the goal of what I was talking about was keeping the players in the game while also not having it be a wrestling match, but sure, it can be done with something that also keeps free throw totals low. I was spitballing, as I said, and one of my suggestions was in the article.
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
473
Reaction Score
1,280
After last nights “Basketball Game” it got me thinking: What is the history/reason for why players foul out in Basketball?

It is the only sport I can think of that forces their stars to miss the most important parts of the game (many times due to poor officiating).

Imagine if Kelce was disqualified in the playoffs after 3 offensive pass interference calls, or Gordie Howe was in the locker room in the 3rd due to 2 slashing penalties, or Roger Clemens kicked out of the World Series in the 4th inning because of two balks?

We nearly didn’t win our 2004 Championship due to Okafor having to sit out the majority of the Duke game.

There are penalties if a player commits a foul (free throws or possession for the other team). So why is it necessary to disqualify a player if they reach 5 fouls (or 6 in the NBA)?

I’ve never really thought about it before, but it seems so ridiculous when you sit back and think about it.
My first thought was, “Yeah…he’s right!”. Then I realized it would take more than one rule change to avoid turning it into a free throw competition. In either case it could potentially completely change the way a game is played and that alone makes it a non starter. There is strategy revolving around players potentially fouling out, it’s another part of the game players and coaches should master just like anything else.
 

RichZ

Fort the ead!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,242
Reaction Score
22,296
If the game was played this way, Donovan would get smashed before he even touched the ball. Three-point shooters would be hammered on every shot. Layups would result in broken arms.
Yeah, just like it used to be in Washington Park in Bridgeport. When you ain't got no refs anyway, what's the difference?
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2015
Messages
309
Reaction Score
775

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
1,452
Total visitors
1,557

Forum statistics

Threads
157,154
Messages
4,085,574
Members
9,982
Latest member
Vincent22


Top Bottom