So you only look at statistics, I find that strange but it's your preference as a sports fan. You've brought up Michael Young several times in relation to Jeter. Michael Young was a great player with a lot of achievements. If you take rings, all-star appearances, MVP voting, silver slugger, gold glove, rookie of the year, longevity, memorable plays in baseball history, intangibles etc. out of it Jeter is significantly better than Michael Young statistically.
I asked ChatGPT, a non biased source, to outline what would have happened if Jeter and Young switched teams for their entire career.
This is a fascinating hypothetical: swapping Derek Jeter and Michael Young, two elite shortstops of their era, and imagining how their careers might have unfolded had they played for each other’s teams their entire careers. Let’s look at the comparison based on performance, context (team, media, postseason), and legacy, then analyze how the swap might have changed public and professional perception.
Swap Scenario: Jeter on the Rangers, Young on the Yankees
Michael Young as a Career Yankee
Upside:
• Bigger Stage: Playing in New York, Young’s consistent .300+ batting averages would’ve gained far more national attention.
• Postseason Exposure: With the Yankees’ perennial playoff appearances, Young would likely have appeared in 100+ postseason games.
• Team Success: Likely picks up multiple rings, significantly boosting his legacy.
• Marketing & Fame: Would have benefited from the Yankee spotlight, perhaps turning into a household name and HOF candidate.
Downside:
• Defensive Concerns: Young was a below-average shortstop defensively, worse than Jeter in many metrics. Yankee fans and media may have scrutinized this more heavily.
• No “Captain” Mystique: Even in NY, it’s unclear whether Young would’ve developed the same aura as Jeter without the clutch postseason moments Jeter delivered.
Probable Outcome: Michael Young becomes a beloved, respected Yankee — probably a 3–4× champion, potential Hall of Fame fringe candidate with 2,500+ hits and greater WAR due to team context. Media profile rises dramatically.
⸻
⚾ Derek Jeter as a Career Ranger
Upside:
• Offensive Performance: Jeter’s consistency and leadership still stand out in any uniform. Likely remains a .300 hitter with 2,500–3,000 hits.
• Locker Room Leadership: Helps build a winning culture in Texas earlier; maybe accelerates the Rangers’ 2010–11 rise.
Downside:
• Less Postseason Success: Without the Yankees’ deep playoff runs, Jeter might only reach 1 or 2 postseasons, likely with no championships.
• Reduced Fame: Fewer clutch postseason moments = no “Mr. November,” no “Flip Play,” no 3,000th hit HR in Yankee Stadium.
• Media Profile: The Texas market offers less exposure; Jeter’s brand (and endorsements) would not be nearly as huge.
Probable Outcome: Jeter still becomes a star, probably a 10+ time All-Star, hits 3,000, but never wins a ring. Hall of Fame induction still likely — though not unanimous — and without the mythos.