Stewie's place in UCWBB History | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Stewie's place in UCWBB History

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd be careful judging a player's place in history by the number of awards she receives. There are too many tangential factors to identify exactly why players are chosen AA, MOP, NPOY.

Court presense is the best consideration I think. What does a player mean to her team when she's on the court? How does she affect the game? For how many years was she the most influential player in the country.

Catchings and Parker were that player for Tennessee for their careers. Griner at Baylor, and we've had three that truly fit that mold. Taurasi, Maya and now Stewie.

There are other potential nominees but the total number of players that have dominated the game in this way while they played is not great.

Taurasi was the greatest single force the game has seen. Skill, leadership, pure bravado. Maya was the best athlete I've seen play the game. The fluid nature of her game, her instincts and her determination. But Stewie brings with her size the abilty to hurt an opponent from anywhere on the court.

All three are great athletes. All could score, pass and defend, and all are champions. D and Maya have continued to prove that in their pro and international careers. I don't see a need to rate them against each other.

Ask yourself if Stewie would being going for four if Steff were not on the court with her those first two years, or if Maya would have finished her career here with 150 wins and only four loses if Tina was not her teammate for three of those years, and of course Taurasi played with four first round WNBA draftpicks her fist two years.

A tweak here or there and anyone of them might have four NC's or, managed only one. I'm not a statistics guy. How many wins a player accumulates is a function of team. What they do, and what they mean when they are on the court is the best way to judge a players value; their legacy.

If we somehow get beaten in the tournament will Stewie's supporters drop her a knotch? We've been lucky enough to watch a long string of AA's play for Geno and we've had more NPOY than any other program. And at the top of that impressive congregation of talent we hoist three of the best who ever played the game.

I have no problem letting them stand side-by-side.
What a wonderful response. Talking about all the variables that may have changed team outcomes and determined successes. The one thing I agree is how the team is influenced when you are actually on the court. In that regard, I have to say that you've won the argument for Maya being considered at least the best Huskie ever. I seem to feel that she influenced the game more than either Stewie or Diana when she was on the court though it isn't a slam dunk. I just felt that she influenced the flow of the game more so when she is in the game and was more of a determining factor. The grace and class that she always displayed has always astounded me. Maybe those qualities are another reason why I have always preferred her over Diana as my pick for the all time great Huskie.
 
Just looking at the two squads the scales are pegged to Taurasi as doing the most with the least. Besides Moore being a Sr vs DT as a Jr, Moore had Hayes (as a Jr) who was as good as anyone on DT's squad. Add in 2 eventual 2X AA's in Hartley and Dolson, and Faris who is arguably the best defensive player ever at UCONN, and the talent level is not even close between these two squads.
What I would say is that the talent in women's basketball over those two seasons was at a very low ebb. I agree Diana should be given some accolades with her leadership but the quality of the "top tier teams" was quite low.
 
I disagree with that characterization of Maya's defense (she was never careless in anything she has done in life I think! :)), and I think DT's defensive liability has always been more of a myth generated by Geno than reality. None of these players were quite Kelly Faris in terms of defensive intensity, but they all played good defense. I will give Breanna a slight edge because of her height, but Maya playing both up in size against taller players and down in size against faster players performed very well.
Thank you. When I heard that response, I was highly offended. Maya was a good defender and her overwhelming advantage in steals means that she took the ball out of the other teams hands and given it to yours. That is probably the biggest advantage on the defensive end you can get. Blocked shots can be recovered by the offensive team and may still lead to scores against you. Not so, steals.
 
?? I think I understand the point you are trying to make ... see my response to UcMiami ... yet you are bringing up something that does not jive well with your post. Out of the three, Stewart had to face the most terrific opponent of all four times, the senior Diggins squad. The Notre Dame squads that Moore faced were not as opposing as the one Stewart beat when it had to be done. True, Stewart lost three times to them as an inexperienced freshman but won the most important game of all. Stewart was the most important player in helping us beat a better team at the most important time that year. Beating a strong but inferior team four times in a year is not as impressive to me as beating a strong and superior team only once, the one time that matters most. I can see the logic in always being able to beat a strong but inferior team, even four times in a row, as an indicator of greatness. I don't think that compares well with the greatness of beating a superior team when it matters most. Yes, our respective criterion for greatness is subjective, as is all of human endeavor even when using objective numbers to make claims more reliable, but at least it's not as beside the point as debating precisely which squad had better surrounding talent.
I never felt that the Diggins teams were superior though they were obviously quite talented. In just about every game that UConn was losing to Notre Dame in those few years it was UConn faltering mentally and making uncharacteristic mistakes including blowing the leading end of one and ones and overall lousy foul shooting along with dumb unforced turnovers. I don't think anyone on the boneyard would have called these Notre Dame teams SUPERIOR at that time so had did they all of a sudden become so. The Maya teams outside of Tina Charle's senior year were not considered heavy favorites to win the national championship and has anyone ever taken over a championship game more so than did Maya against Stanford in the second half?????????? I respected Diana's talent but I never liked her persona on the court and no one has ever had a better balance of talent and grace than has Maya on the court. She's probably the biggest ambassador of UConn women's basketball ever.
 
I think a lot of the Stewart as GOAT debate has to do with the fact she plays for the UConn of 2013-2016. The reason she has a chance at 4 NCs has as much to do with where Auriemma has gotten the program in its current "generation/iteration". Put Stewart on the 2001-2004 and DT on the 2013-2016 UConn teams, and it would be really interesting to see their NCs and stats. All hypothetical of course, but still...
 
I
I respected Diana's talent but I never liked her persona on the court and no one has ever had a better balance of talent and grace than has Maya on the court. She's probably the biggest ambassador of UConn women's basketball ever.
You bring up an interesting aspect of this comparison-the persona. Athletically all three did things that at times took your breath away. After the play Diana was likely to pop her collar, Maya just elegantly swaggered back down the court for the next play & Stewie was more Cali- kool business like-as in what is everyone jumping up and down for? Different styles for sure and I actually wonder how many fans align with (in your case go away from) each player based on style or persona? Because face it, the substance of each is pretty much the same-spectacular!
 
If one is to judge a body of work, I think it's fair to compare freshman years. Who was better than Stewie in the Big Dance as a frosh?
 
What I would say is that the talent in women's basketball over those two seasons was at a very low ebb. I agree Diana should be given some accolades with her leadership but the quality of the "top tier teams" was quite low.
Agree that is one thing to look at, the competition.
 
I hope everyone is enjoying this discussion because it really is interesting to me with lots and lots of good points being brought up. I am going to try and keep this a little short, but who knows with so many issues under consideration::rolleyes:
1. I think a defining moment for the Stewart/Taurasi comparison is that freshman year semi-final - Diana's worst game ever (?) vs. one of Breanna's best ever - their freshman years pretty similar (except for injuries) and one stepped up big time and the other did not - general feeling in both instances was that was the championship game. Both surrounded by very talented and experienced teammates.

2. We think of Stef and Bria as 'future AAs' and national championship winners without Maya, and we think of Turner and Strother, and Crockett as 'unable to get it done' on their own. But we also have to remember the 'reinforcements' that were added for Stef and Bria - AAs KML, Breanna, Moriah, and Morgan - and it wasn't until the second wave of reinforcements that they were actually able to break through for their last two years. Ann, Barb, and Willnett never got that type of infusion of talent - the only future AA arrived their senior season in Rene - there were some good recruits in Houston Thomas and Swanier, and Greene their senior year, as well as the injured Hunter as a transfer but there really isn't any comparison. And KML, Stewart, Tuck, and Jefferson to that 2005 and 2006 team and who knows what would have happened!

3. Specific to Stef - it wasn't until after her freshman experience that she realized she had to transform herself and proceeded to do so. Stef in her championship years is a very different player from Stef as a freshman.

4. Specific to Ann and Bria - they were actually very comparable as freshman - Hartley scored a little more 12.4 to 10.0, but Strother had more assists and fewer turnovers, and more rebounds - both playing 31+ minutes per game.

5. Faris was great and really good as a sophomore but she was sort of Battle 2.0 - they were both incredibly athletic and great defenders who provided a little offense when needed - Battle played fewer minutes but per minute provided very similar stats - scoring significantly more and more efficiently, while not being as good a passer with a significantly worse A/TO. They both rebounded really well from the wing/guard spot - per minute the edge goes to Battle, per game to Faris.

6. Taurasi as a guard and primary ball handler had an easier leadership role to perform than Maya as a forward. On that senior year team she was not only playing the 4, but for the 15 minutes per game that Stef was unable to play, she was playing as an undersized center and Faris was playing as an undersized 4 after Walker decamped. A much tougher job to direct the offense from those positions.

7. A good point about 4th games against the same opponent in a season ND, Baylor, and Uconn have all failed that test in the NCAA tournament - and in the last 5 years.

8. Digger - I am in complete agreement about making evaluations of relative talent based on previous and future accomplishments and trying to assign a value to a specific moment in time - a semifinal game. I am just trying to fight against mythology that has developed over time and get everyone to really look at those two years through a lens of actual facts, not the future disappointments or triumphs that somewhat muddy our memories. Neither of the two teams lacked in talented players, both relied on inexperienced players to grow up quickly and perform in the biggest moment. And both teams had wonderful superstar leaders. In a team sport against varying competition there is no answer, just a lovely discussion.

Aside: On TN iconic players - we think of Catchings with the whole package of college, pros, and USA rolled together, but in college Holdsclaw was the real terror of those TN teams I think and would be the one to stand with Parker. (Not unlike Moriah/Breanna)

Not so short after all.:oops:
 
Hongster - way to cut through all our drivel! :)

And one caveat on Stewart - she has had an easier path to domination as she has always been able to 'do her thing' on the court, and allow other teammates to lead the team. Skill wise she has been the star, but Bria and Stef and Kelly led the team for her as a freshman, Bria and Stef as a sophomore, and now Morgan and Moriah for her last two years. It is not a luxury afford either Maya or Diana after their sophomore seasons. It may not seem like much, but I think it does make a difference in the demands on a player and their stress level. Stewart hasn't completely ignored this aspect, but except for a few days after Stanford last year, she hasn't had to lead. (KML to a large degree had the same 'do her own thing' freedom.)
 
In Stewart's case she was the key player in beating a team that already beat us three times that year.

I'd have to rank them Taurasi, Stewart and Moore.

If I understand correctly, you're making a positive out of Stewie not playing as well earlier in the season? :)
 
Aside: On TN iconic players - we think of Catchings with the whole package of college, pros, and USA rolled together, but in college Holdsclaw was the real terror of those TN teams I think and would be the one to stand with Parker. (Not unlike Moriah/Breanna)

Not so short after all.:oops:

Thanks for a great post :)

As a fan, there was always, "Okay, well, Swin on Catchings and it'll be fine." OTOH, there just wasn't that sense with Holdsclaw.
 
Hongster - way to cut through all our drivel! :)

An't nobody got time for that! :)
 
Stewie is the undisputed GOAT to ever played for UCWBB.
Your opinion, not everyone's

upload_2016-1-28_12-55-4.png
 
This has been one of the better, more thoughtful threads in a while.

Reading the many detailed comments I began to wonder if we should be asking a different or additional series of questions? Maybe wondering who is the Greatest of All-Time, given the myriad of complicated factors that influence your choice, is really just an exercise in trying to understand chaos theory.

- If you had only one pick, who would you choose to build your team around?

- Who has been the most difficult player to defend game in, game out?

- Who would you want beside you in a foxhole in a life and death situation? (Which converts in a more generic sense to, Who's the guttiest player to ever walk on a court?)

I can only be certain of the answer to the third one.
 
Bonplan - interesting variation:
1. Pick - Maya, DT, Breanna - didn't get it done her senior year, but has everywhere else she has been and her drive is contagious on the practice court as well as in games. (and this is assuming mature players make up the team.
2. Difficult - Breanna, Maya, DT - no substitute for height and length, near run thing with 2nd and 3rd.
3. Foxhole - DT, Maya, Breanna - Yeah well, pretty obvious.
 
?? I think I understand the point you are trying to make ... see my response to UcMiami ... yet you are bringing up something that does not jive well with your post. Out of the three, Stewart had to face the most terrific opponent of all four times, the senior Diggins squad. The Notre Dame squads that Moore faced were not as opposing as the one Stewart beat when it had to be done. True, Stewart lost three times to them as an inexperienced freshman but won the most important game of all. Stewart was the most important player in helping us beat a better team at the most important time that year. Beating a strong but inferior team four times in a year is not as impressive to me as beating a strong and superior team only once, the one time that matters most. I can see the logic in always being able to beat a strong but inferior team, even four times in a row, as an indicator of greatness. I don't think that compares well with the greatness of beating a superior team when it matters most. Yes, our respective criterion for greatness is subjective, as is all of human endeavor even when using objective numbers to make claims more reliable, but at least it's not as beside the point as debating precisely which squad had better surrounding talent.

BTW- I love this thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

When I posted to you I was just replying to the point that DT had 3 titles and made her players better while Maya had 2 and the one she lost as a sr she scored a ton but didn't make her teammates better. I just wasn't willing to agree with you on that point in a substantial way - but I know because DT is a super passer she can appear to make teammates better vs an elite scorer. But I think great scorers can make players bettertoo. For example, limit Rodman making passes or offensive moves - have him set picks and fly to the basket for offensive rebounds as he plays with the supreme scorer. SO much attention is being put out to defend the supreme scorer, Rodman can more easily "have his way."

I do believe Maya's teammates were better in her sr year vs DT's but Maya having to beat a terrific ND team 4 times- I just don't think that ND was THAT inferior imo to be rolled over 4 straight times in a single season. They "could" be but that I won't hold it directly against Amazing Maya. Even the greatest teams ever in the NBA - it is brutal for them to sweep a very, very, very good opponent. I brought Stewie into it because imo if Stewie from her soph year on had to lead her team to beat ND for three straight years 4 times- no way she can do it. ND is tooooo good -- and tooo well coached to be taken 12 straight times in 3 years.

For me I give slight edge to DT as best - but it is so slight imo between her and Maya. I wouldn't "argue" those that say Maya. Right now imo Stewie is 3rd- because she hasn't finished "school" yet. I'm with you about taking a special support for someone who is the huge cog in an upset like DT did with Texas. I'm also under the belief if you are a big favorite you should not lose in the NCAA's unless injuries or you are playing a team 4 times in one season in which the opposing team is extremely good too etc. I'm also of a very, very minority opinion that regular seasons count too. So Stewie's frosh reg season - it wasn't that great. OFC NCAA Tourney counts more but it doesn't mean Reg. Season doesn't count at all. I have to see what Stewie and MoJeff do the rest of the season before I bump them.

I loved how you brought up the DT and Tennessee game. All three have their own significant calling cards- though I maybe am probably minimizing Stewie's that follows: 1.) With DT it was her strong will with that Tenn game as a case in point. 2.) With Maya is was her dogged relentlessness as the DePaul game was a case in point. 3.) For Stewie it is her shear presence. When she caught the Rutgers player - that presence resonates to the "next game and next opponent." I watched last year's finals again vs ND at the 2:25 mark left in 1st half, a tough kid in Cable goes up for a layup and throws up an airball. When we play- teams pack zone defense and give our shooters from outside any shot they want. Her "presence" is awesome. After this season I might go with her as best. Incomplete for me right now. Further, last year she should not have been awarded Final Four MVP.
 
I hope everyone is enjoying this discussion because it really is interesting to me with lots and lots of good points being brought up. I am going to try and keep this a little short, but who knows with so many issues under consideration::rolleyes:

Not so short after all.:oops:

Loved your post UC! I love these discussions too. I am with digger on who had the stronger team. I think Maya's team was stronger. IMO nobody could compare to Tiff Hayes that was on DT's team. Secondly, Stef was a better cog at the center than Turner was at the pf. IMO Turner was always too small. I know Farris wound up playing some pf - but Turner was a full-time pf. In the close games UCONN played ND prior to Final Four Stef played 40 minutes and 27 minutes. In those two games - imo they are a more well-rounded team than what DT had. I also happen ot believe and months ago I went back-and-forth with someone at great length, imo DT is the greatest sg defensive rebounder I have ever seen. Someone countered that by including players like Parker, EDD and McAughtery because they take outside shots. That is NOT in the spirit of my comment. DT was a sg - or if you want to call her a pg-- and just because some players like EDD take 3's on offense - or maybe Angle played spot minutes as a sg- isn't in the spirit of my comment. DT was able to counter the size factor short-comings of her team at the pf spot and Ann's lack of strength at the sf. SO yes Maya gets kudos for playing center- Dt imo gets kudos for being a bulldog too in the paint.

*** Yet I also believe - Maya's team got burned and in these discussions she is in an unfair position to a point. First is as I stated Geno remarked that he made a move two times in Maya's sr year to start the game off getting Maya going. One game was Stanford. The other ND. Both games UCONN lost. Their only two losses. (Though Sue Bird has said during DT's frosh year in Final Four vs ND - Geno went ballistic at halftime and Bird felt it shell-shocked the entire team - so I don't hit on DT as much for her bad game. I mean Sue Bird - one of the greatest pg's ever doesn't go around casually saying things like this if not some truth.) Second point is that one thing DT had an advantage was the bench in the low post. Maya lost 3 post players within a year - EDD, the transfer kid from the West Coast that went back home to I think New Zealand (?) after initially committing she would come, and Walker. This meant any trouble they had inside - they had no bench. While DT - if BT got into trouble you can play Moore and Crockett. If AS or MC had trouble you had Battle. Once Stef went out, Maya's team became more flawed. Until that time, Maya's team was superior. The refs ended up making one bad call if not two on Stef and she never got into the game.

As for Stewie - imo this is opposite of DT's frosh year. CD recognized that either she or overall the coaching staff made a mistake in how they handled Stewie all year. Thus Geno and CD get kudos for that. Yet as Sue Bird mentioned - Geno doesn't get kudos for how he handled THAT final four. Nor does he get it for Maya's last game. Sometimes the coach makes a mistake. So for me I believe he has. So in this case I take that into consideration. Others may throw it away as irrelevant. All sooo subjective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
237
Guests online
1,671
Total visitors
1,908

Forum statistics

Threads
164,032
Messages
4,379,261
Members
10,172
Latest member
ctfb19382


.
..
Top Bottom