That's not Anderson!did someone change our shad of Blue?
Reminds me of a post about Rock from about a year ago. My sarcastic reply was "One and done". Looks like I called that one right!![]()
Kid's got some guns...
Sorry nothing more profound than that....
I think Enoch is the opposite, the sky is the limit if this kid works hard and bides his time. Is he even 17 yet?
Of course I have to post this videoAll I know is, If we get to factor in our players hair this year, we're going to be playing like a half dozen 7-footers.
Quite frankly, don't compare Steve to the Rock. Having said that there were stretches late in the season when Rock was the best Big on the court - that said a lot about our Bigs last year.
Except for 5 minutes of the Cincy game he was never the best big on the court
#conspiracyNot that it really means anything, but I thought Enoch was an ESPN top 100 player. I know his rating of 81 puts him right on the edge, but the "top 100" list appears to stop at 97. There are only 97 players in ESPN's top 100 for 2015?
http://espn.go.com/college-sports/basketball/recruiting/playerrankings/_/class/2015/order/true
EDIT: A quick glance at some other years suggests that it's not uncommon for the list to stop before 100... odd.
espn has missed the boat, check this breakdown http://www.draftexpress.com/RSCI/2015/ . Enoch is like the only player who is top 50 on scout and 247 but not top 100 in espn. him and jamal murray who is an intl prospectNot that it really means anything, but I thought Enoch was an ESPN top 100 player. I know his rating of 81 puts him right on the edge, but the "top 100" list appears to stop at 97. There are only 97 players in ESPN's top 100 for 2015?
http://espn.go.com/college-sports/basketball/recruiting/playerrankings/_/class/2015/order/true
EDIT: A quick glance at some other years suggests that it's not uncommon for the list to stop before 100... odd.
I don't disagree with that, quite frankly. The bar was set very low.Five minutes is generous. I think the general frustration level with the bigs was so high that if he did something even slightly productive (grabbed a loose ball, converted a wide open layup) I think we made it a much, much bigger deal than it was.
Rock was very small @ 6'5 1/2". Big difference is Enoch is at least 6'10", big difference @ PFQuite frankly, don't compare Steve to the Rock. Having said that there were stretches late in the season when Rock was the best Big on the court - that said a lot about our Bigs last year.