Steve Enoch

[Leebo]

I think Enoch is the opposite, the sky is the limit if this kid works hard and bides his time. Is he even 17 yet?

He's over 18 if the birthdate I see of 9/18/97 is correct... him being 16 would be crazy.

 

[KembaStepback]

16? He'd also have to be a genius to finish high school that fast.

 

[bmayuc]

All I know is, If we get to factor in our players hair this year, we're going to be playing like a half dozen 7-footers.

 

[imno1]

All I know is, If we get to factor in our players hair this year, we're going to be playing like a half dozen 7-footers.

Of course I have to post this video

 

[Chief00]

Quite frankly, don't compare Steve to the Rock. Having said that there were stretches late in the season when Rock was the best Big on the court - that said a lot about our Bigs last year.

 

[mauconnfan]

Quite frankly, don't compare Steve to the Rock. Having said that there were stretches late in the season when Rock was the best Big on the court - that said a lot about our Bigs last year.

Except for 5 minutes of the Cincy game he was never the best big on the court

 

[BigErnMcCracken]

Except for 5 minutes of the Cincy game he was never the best big on the court

Five minutes is generous. I think the general frustration level with the bigs was so high that if he did something even slightly productive (grabbed a loose ball, converted a wide open layup) I think we made it a much, much bigger deal than it was.

 

[Leebo]

Not that it really means anything, but I thought Enoch was an ESPN top 100 player. I know his rating of 81 puts him right on the edge, but the "top 100" list appears to stop at 97. There are only 97 players in ESPN's top 100 for 2015?

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/basketball/recruiting/playerrankings/_/class/2015/order/true

EDIT: A quick glance at some other years suggests that it's not uncommon for the list to stop before 100... odd.

 

[Huskyforlife]

Not that it really means anything, but I thought Enoch was an ESPN top 100 player. I know his rating of 81 puts him right on the edge, but the "top 100" list appears to stop at 97. There are only 97 players in ESPN's top 100 for 2015?

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/basketball/recruiting/playerrankings/_/class/2015/order/true

EDIT: A quick glance at some other years suggests that it's not uncommon for the list to stop before 100... odd.

#conspiracy

 

[James]

Not that it really means anything, but I thought Enoch was an ESPN top 100 player. I know his rating of 81 puts him right on the edge, but the "top 100" list appears to stop at 97. There are only 97 players in ESPN's top 100 for 2015?

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/basketball/recruiting/playerrankings/_/class/2015/order/true

EDIT: A quick glance at some other years suggests that it's not uncommon for the list to stop before 100... odd.

espn has missed the boat, check this breakdown http://www.draftexpress.com/RSCI/2015/ . Enoch is like the only player who is top 50 on scout and 247 but not top 100 in espn. him and jamal murray who is an intl prospect

 

[Chief00]

Five minutes is generous. I think the general frustration level with the bigs was so high that if he did something even slightly productive (grabbed a loose ball, converted a wide open layup) I think we made it a much, much bigger deal than it was.

I don't disagree with that, quite frankly. The bar was set very low.

 

[Yonick]

Quite frankly, don't compare Steve to the Rock. Having said that there were stretches late in the season when Rock was the best Big on the court - that said a lot about our Bigs last year.

Rock was very small @ 6'5 1/2". Big difference is Enoch is at least 6'10", big difference @ PF