Looking back how did the team below not make the NCAAT? At the time there were certainly chemistry issues and shooting issues but man.
PG - Kemba
SG - Dyson
SF - Stanley
PF - Edwards
C - Oriakhi
Where the similarities to this year might end up being valid is that 2010 would have gone a whole lot differently if not for five heartbreaking losses (and no offsetting wins in the final seconds either):
1) Kentucky thanks to the John Wall 3 point play.
2) Cincy thanks to the bogus foul call that put Lance Stephenson to the line with no time left.
3) Georgetown, where we were up 19 early in the second half and then decided not to guard Austin Freeman for the rest of the game.
4) Marquette thanks to Jimmy Butler's last second shot (not to mention we fouled a 3 point shooter on the previous possession with a 3 point lead).
5) Louisville thanks to Edgar Sosa's last second shot.
Had two or three of those games ended differently, that team makes the tournament. That team seemed to decide that they had enough after that Louisville game. I tend to think they would have had a more spirited finish to the season if they were playing for NCAA seeding instead of NIT seeding.
On a related note, we spend so much time constructing narratives about team chemistry, leadership, etc. to explain why team A overachieved but team B underachieved. How about this one - some years (2011 and 2014) we make the shots on the final possession of close games...and some years (2010 and so far this year) the other guys make those shots.