UcMiami
How it is
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,197
- Reaction Score
- 47,326
I am a very loyal fan, and love to watch Uconn stomp all over good teams and bad, and I even enjoy games where they are challenged and prevail.
This is a great team this year, but to read the gnashing and moaning in the game thread, and in the post game analyses, the sky is falling, the team can't defend, everyone but Stewart is chopped liver, etc.
Just as a reminder - other teams are allowed to play their A+ game when they play against us, and when that happens, as it has the past two games, it will not look easy. We still won both games comfortably and were not truly challenged in the fourth quarter of either.
We do seem to think as a group anything less than 20 point wins are a disaster - as a reminder:
2002 NC 39-0 - what Geno refers to as the best team ever - beat #23 VaTech by 9, as well as having three 14 point wins against teams ranked #2, #3, and #23, and an 18 point win against an unranked PSU and a 12 point win against OK.
2008 - 39-0 Maya, Tina, and Rene - the first team to do the whole year with double digit wins, but had a 10 point win against an 11 loss Rutgers team and a 7 loss ND team as well as 11, 12, and 13 point wins against other pretty mediocre teams.
2009 - 39-0 Maya/Tina - 6 point win in the NC after cruising through the year with 12, 14, and 15 point wins being as close as folks got.
2014 - 40-0 Dolson/Hartley et. al. - repeat of the double digit margin of victory with the closest game being #7 Baylor at 11 pts, and #14 Texas A&M by 15.
The sky really isn't falling, we are 6-0 having played teams ranked by Massey as #2, #13, #17, #20, #54, #57 and coming through with a 35.4 point margin of victory over the strongest schedule of any team at this point of the season (and a stronger early season schedule than Uconn has ever played.) Moaning about how much we miss KML's threes doesn't compute in my mind because we just played two good, well coached, inspired teams and won by double digits with the mixture of players we have today, whereas when we played a similar team early last year, KML's threes couldn't save us from the loss.
It is early and there are obviously some things to tighten up, and the team has not yet fully gelled. But it is a very good team that should end up as a great one.
(And yes - luck is involved in a team shooting 65% from three when when one of their players shoots 75% on threes and 25% on FTs and 20% on twos (3-4/1-4/1-5 were Arike's numbers)
This is a great team this year, but to read the gnashing and moaning in the game thread, and in the post game analyses, the sky is falling, the team can't defend, everyone but Stewart is chopped liver, etc.
Just as a reminder - other teams are allowed to play their A+ game when they play against us, and when that happens, as it has the past two games, it will not look easy. We still won both games comfortably and were not truly challenged in the fourth quarter of either.
We do seem to think as a group anything less than 20 point wins are a disaster - as a reminder:
2002 NC 39-0 - what Geno refers to as the best team ever - beat #23 VaTech by 9, as well as having three 14 point wins against teams ranked #2, #3, and #23, and an 18 point win against an unranked PSU and a 12 point win against OK.
2008 - 39-0 Maya, Tina, and Rene - the first team to do the whole year with double digit wins, but had a 10 point win against an 11 loss Rutgers team and a 7 loss ND team as well as 11, 12, and 13 point wins against other pretty mediocre teams.
2009 - 39-0 Maya/Tina - 6 point win in the NC after cruising through the year with 12, 14, and 15 point wins being as close as folks got.
2014 - 40-0 Dolson/Hartley et. al. - repeat of the double digit margin of victory with the closest game being #7 Baylor at 11 pts, and #14 Texas A&M by 15.
The sky really isn't falling, we are 6-0 having played teams ranked by Massey as #2, #13, #17, #20, #54, #57 and coming through with a 35.4 point margin of victory over the strongest schedule of any team at this point of the season (and a stronger early season schedule than Uconn has ever played.) Moaning about how much we miss KML's threes doesn't compute in my mind because we just played two good, well coached, inspired teams and won by double digits with the mixture of players we have today, whereas when we played a similar team early last year, KML's threes couldn't save us from the loss.
It is early and there are obviously some things to tighten up, and the team has not yet fully gelled. But it is a very good team that should end up as a great one.
(And yes - luck is involved in a team shooting 65% from three when when one of their players shoots 75% on threes and 25% on FTs and 20% on twos (3-4/1-4/1-5 were Arike's numbers)