More specific please? "According to.... "Spanos is out.
More specific please? "According to.... "Spanos is out.
I'm thinking this is Chief trying to be funnyMore specific please? "According to.... "
man my brain is so short circuited these days... blah... my bad.I'm thinking this is Chief trying to be funny
Hint:What do you mean?
Hint:Hint:
- How much of the press conference was about, while we want him to take care of personal business, Spanos is valued and respected and we look forward to his return when he’s ready?
- How much of the presser was about the young defensive coaches and how well they work with the head coach?
The news I am breaking isn’t a leave of absence.Hint:
If you reply to a thread a week and a half after someone breaks the news, you won't be able to convince anyone that you have breaking news on the subject.
Besides everyone knows that Conspiracy Kitty broke this story back on post number 121:Hint:
If you reply to a thread a week and a half after someone breaks the news, you won't be able to convince anyone that you have breaking news on the subject.
Conspiracy Kitty says:
I don’t want to tell tails out of school, I’ve been hearing that Lou Spanos is taking a leave of absence through the end of the season for personal reasons. I just got a confirmation personally delivered to my phone from ESPN.
View attachment 78402
Sorry, my error.The news I am breaking isn’t a leave of absence.
No offense, but you really think the FB regulars can't figure out that Spanos was told to pack his stuff and hit the road?A “leave of absence” implies an eventual return. “Indefinite” typically means it should eventually happen. Neither is the case.
The usual suspects here are stuck in the Randy 2.0 era. So much so that when Chief provides an easily readable roadmap, it creates confusion.
The news you are claiming to be breaking was done by the OP. Was seconded by Exit 4.The news I am breaking isn’t a leave of absence.
A “leave of absence” implies an eventual return. “Indefinite” typically means it should eventually happen. Neither is the case.
The usual suspects here are stuck in the Randy 2.0 era. So much so that when Chief provides an easily readable roadmap, it creates confusion.
It's like when ESPN "confirms" the reporting of others.The news you are claiming to be breaking was done by the OP. Was seconded by Exit 4.
FWIW - There were more than a few Yarders that hung on to the notion that it was a legit LOA.No offense, but you really think the FB regulars can't figure out that Spanos was told to pack his stuff and hit the road?
Exactly, as witness the article Palatine posted.FWIW - There were more than a few Yarders that hung on to the notion that it was a legit LOA.
As for Chief - well, he's doing things his way - BAU.
What was I trying to take credit for?Yah thanks chief anyone with a few functioning brain cells knew it wasn’t for the stated reasons. But thanks for trying to take credit 10 days later that’s good for a chuckle!