Are tickets still $5.00. Which team makes the most money at the gate?South Carolina hasn't had much trouble selling a good number of the 18,000 seats on game day in their home venue, the Colonial Life Arena lately. We can only imagine
that interest and ticket sales will go up, now that the Gamecocks are the defending national champions. After all, everybody loves a winner.
We've already sold well over 10,000 season tickets, which doesn't include student tickets. Season ticket sales continue another 2 months so I wouldn't be surprised if season ticket sales exceed last year's average attendance. Our men's attendance will likely jump, too. They were 21st in average attendance last year and top 10 wouldn't shock me this year.
Are tickets still $5.00. Which team makes the most money at the gate?
We've already sold well over 10,000 season tickets, which doesn't include student tickets. Season ticket sales continue another 2 months so I wouldn't be surprised if season ticket sales exceed last year's average attendance. Our men's attendance will likely jump, too. They were 21st in average attendance last year and top 10 wouldn't shock me this year.
lol some of you sound salty that SC has cheap ticket prices... sheesh.
I wonder whats the difference in ticket prices between South Carolina and UCONN in football???
lol some of you sound salty that SC has cheap ticket prices... sheesh.
Uconn Wbb pays for itself.Just as long as I can get a ticket to witness Duke putting a L on the defending champs
Dont all WCBB programs operate in the red? Just a matter of who loses more money than the next school.
Not salty. But the giveaway ticket prices explain why SC leads the nation in attendance. If UConn had prices anywhere close to those of SC, it would have sold out every game for the last 20+ years.
But they aren't and they didn't. Give SC its due.
In any event, when you have SEC money, you can forgo a bit of wcbb revenue for the sake of building a fanbase.
I don't think anyone is saying that alone is exactly why but you also can't say it's not a contributing factor. The fact of the matter is their tickets ARE cheaper. I don't see anything wrong with that. They put a good product on the floor and people showed up. Dawn also does a lot in the community. I also feel like her use of social media and making the fans feel involved has helped with their attendance. She likes the games to be a "party" atmosphere.Exactly. It's a very arrogant viewpoint when you say something like "giveaway prices explain why SC leads the nation in attendance".. almost as if winning and the fans actually showing up and being engaged, and marketing campaigns like the "Drive for 5" had nothing to do with it.
SC puts a very good and entertaining family fun product on the floor for a reasonable price. Dawn has cultivated an exciting gameday environment and the fans are engaged. Dumbing it down to just ticket prices discredits all of Dawn's work because if we're being honest.. SC has always had cheap ticket prices for WBB.. even free at one point, but we weren't bringing in 10,000+ crowds on weeknights then so one can assume it's also something else.
A lot of people here didn't see the hard work Dawn put into building a program/fanbase from scratch.. so it's easy to discredit it to something as simple as ticket prices when you're uniformed. There was a process... and perhaps one day our ticket prices will increase exponentially, although I doubt it, we're top 20 in athletic department revenue even with most of our women's sports (some of our best attended) operating in the red. Until that increase happens though, SC shouldn't be ridiculed for having cheaper tickets and good attendance.
I don't think anyone is saying that alone is exactly why but you also can't say it's not a contributing factor. The fact of the matter is their tickets ARE cheaper. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Exactly. It's a very arrogant viewpoint when you say something like "giveaway prices explain why SC leads the nation in attendance".. almost as if winning and the fans actually showing up and being engaged, and marketing campaigns like the "Drive for 5" had nothing to do with it.
SC puts a very good and entertaining family fun product on the floor for a reasonable price. Dawn has cultivated an exciting gameday environment and the fans are engaged. Dumbing it down to just ticket prices discredits all of Dawn's work because if we're being honest.. SC has always had cheap ticket prices for WBB.. even free at one point, but we weren't bringing in 10,000+ crowds on weeknights then so one can assume it's also something else.
A lot of people here didn't see the hard work Dawn put into building a program/fanbase from scratch.. so it's easy to discredit it to something as simple as ticket prices when you're uniformed. There was a process... and perhaps one day our ticket prices will increase exponentially, although I doubt it, we're top 20 in athletic department revenue even with most of our women's sports (some of our best attended) operating in the red. Until that increase happens though, SC shouldn't be ridiculed for having cheaper tickets and good attendance.
Whoa. whoa.... hold on a second. This "Drive for 5" ? Is that a real SC WCBB thing? Shouldn't you be driving for two first?
Signed: Another "Arrogant" UCONN WCBB fan.
I knew what the Drive for 5 was but I can't pass up an opportunity to irk you-you make this too easy. Remember when SC first led the nation in attendance I was the one that called Dawn the best program builder since Geno & CD. You did call @stamfordhusky POV "very arrogant" and I'm pretty sure he's a UCONN fan. It's all good, us UCONN fans have a lot to be arrogant about. SC can keep their young people and that DJ. Us more mature fans of UCONN are doing alright because we can actually afford the high UCONN ticket prices and still pay the mortgage. Do your " younger" fans even know what a Mortgage is?Well first, before somebody jumps in here ready to attack.. I'd like to say that I didn't call UConn fans arrogant. ...
The "Drive for 5" was a marketing campaign for attendance that SC had in place just a few years ago. The goal was to average 5,000 fans per game that season. It was that campaign that really allowed for the creation of our party like/family friendly gameday environment. I brought that up to demonstrate that we didn't start getting good attendance numbers overnight.. there was a process and a foundation was laid.
I know the business goal is to always make more money.. but I honestly hope that SC never increases ticket prices substantially.. it would be very unfortunate to see families and young people priced out of being able to attend. If you've never been to a SC game then it's hard to explain.. but everything there is done in a very lively, engaging way and you see A LOT of students, young people and young families with children.. for one, we have a friggin hip-hop DJ that plays music that young people recognize.. and that's a contrast from most other places where you see older people and less children.
As a marketing professional I concur.The focus shouldn't be on why SC has cheaper tickets in the first place... it should be on why those fans of other programs with cheaper tickets DON'T show up.
I knew what the Drive for 5 was but I can't pass up an opportunity to irk you-you make this too easy. Remember when SC first led the nation in attendance I was the one that called Dawn the best program builder since Geno & CD. You did call @stamfordhusky POV "very arrogant" and I'm pretty sure he's a UCONN fan. It's all good, us UCONN fans have a lot to be arrogant about. SC can keep their young people and that DJ. Us more mature fans of UCONN are doing alright because we can actually afford the high UCONN ticket prices and still pay the mortgage. Do your " younger" fans even know what a Mortgage is?
Not so. I believe that the team has been in the red for most of it's existence. In 2014 the team earnings were $4.0 million while expenditures were $6.3 million.Uconn Wbb pays for itself.
Not so. I believe that the team has been in the red for most of it's existence. In 2014 the team earnings were $4.0 million while expenditures were $6.3 million.
Exactly. It's a very arrogant viewpoint when you say something like "giveaway prices explain why SC leads the nation in attendance".. almost as if winning and the fans actually showing up and being engaged, and marketing campaigns like the "Drive for 5" had nothing to do with it.
I didn't say that, or anything close to that. But feel free to make up stuff if you like. I only said the ultra-cheap prices explain why SC LED the nation. I did not say that winning and marketing campaigns had nothing to do with it. Am curious why facts make one "arrogant".