UCFBfan
Kings of New England!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 6,350
- Reaction Score
- 15,042
This from the guy who's QB is getting $1 million for playing at Alabama??
It's been a few years since I read "Billion Dollar Ball" so I'm not sure about some of the details, but Texas and some other schools have set up their athletic departments as separate corporations. As such, they're free of many encumbrances other athletic departments face.
I don't recall what "charitable purpose" nor the specific IRS code they fall under but I believe it still allows tax exempt status albeit without having to answer to or be regulated by the university's policies.
If what I recall is correct that could lead to loss of tax exempt status and all its benefits if Congress decided there is no charitable purpose to their being and changed the law. It's actually surprising the "progressives" haven't gone after this...........yet.
A company that reports a profit, but retains the profit, still pays tax on their income. And, there are some colleges that do make money on college athletics, so those profits could be taxed, but the vast majority of colleges do not make money on athletics. And, if there was a tax on profits, colleges would find a way to not report profits so taxing college athletic departments is really a mute point.But here is the bottom line -- at the end of the day, there are two types of business entities -- those where the profits get paid out to owners and those where they don't. Even if an athletic department is its own separate corporation, at least to date no one gets to keep the profits. And if that's the case, then the only basis to tax them is the government saying "we don't think your purpose is truly charitable." First, do we want the government making those decisions? But more fundamentally, most of our taxes of business entities is on profits. Athletic departments don't make money and stockpile the proceeds -- they spend proceeds to get better athletic programs. So I ask again -- what exactly are you taxing, because net income won't produce anything?A company that
I like it, but how about injuries? Would the 2's (employees) be covered by the school's Worker's Comp policy? How about the 1's?I think student athletes should have two choices:
1) Receive a scholarship with cost of attendance and athlete benefits tax free.
2) Have college athletes pay taxes on their wages and benefits including tuition reimbursement as "employees".
I put "employees" in quotes because I wouldn't advocate for athletes to become actual employees of the university. I meant that if you want to make money as a college football player, you should pay taxes on the cash and the benefits that you make.I like it, but how about injuries? Would the 2's (employees) be covered by the school's Worker's Comp policy? How about the 1's?
Its probably not worth a million dollars to go to some crap team, against some crap competition, with crap skill players around you. Chances are you get hurt or just don't play as well and you screw up your draft position and and lose millions.
I know we want to get on Saban and Alabama, but I do think Saban is being true to his heart here. He wants players, he recruits the top players. There is no reason Bama wouldn't benefit from free agency. But, Saban knows it isn't good.Lol to Saban talking about an imbalance as to who dominates college football.
I'm confused by this scenario. Athletes with NIL deals are not receiving any wages from the university and NIL money is taxable already. The scholarships are not part of an employee compensation package though. There would be no difference between this scenario and a student with a non-athletics scholarship, who happens to be making an income on non-university endeavors. Should scholarships be taxable for them?One of the biggest issues I see for college athletes if they become "employees" or are making large sums of money is that tuition reimbursement by an employer over a certain level is taxable, so would some portion of college athletic scholarships for "employees" become taxable?
I think student athletes should have two choices:
1) Receive a scholarship with cost of attendance and athlete benefits tax free.
2) Have college athletes pay taxes on their wages and benefits including tuition reimbursement as "employees".
I think the vast majority of athletes would choose option 1, but athletes with large NIL opportunities, like Paige Bueckers, would choose option 2.
Yes. I worked my way through school a lot, I paid taxes. Why not tax student who gets something free that I have to pay for with after tax dollars?I'm confused by this scenario. Athletes with NIL deals are not receiving any wages from the university and NIL money is taxable already. The scholarships are not part of an employee compensation package though. There would be no difference between this scenario and a student with a non-athletics scholarship, who happens to be making an income on non-university endeavors. Should scholarships be taxable for them?
Any of these athletes making NIL money will also be paying taxes. Is your argument that any student who receives a scholarship should be paying taxes on the value of it?Yes. I worked my way through school a lot, I paid taxes. Why not tax student who gets something free that I have to pay for with after tax dollars?
Scholarships aren’t taxable, but income is taxable. They can’t classify students as employees be chase then scholarships are remuneration for services, which is taxable.I'm confused by this scenario. Athletes with NIL deals are not receiving any wages from the university and NIL money is taxable already. The scholarships are not part of an employee compensation package though. There would be no difference between this scenario and a student with a non-athletics scholarship, who happens to be making an income on non-university endeavors. Should scholarships be taxable for them?
If I’m reading what you wrote correctly, I think we agree on this. I think there is a fundamental issue and misunderstanding from the folks saying scholarships should be taxable.Scholarships aren’t taxable, but income is taxable. They can’t classify students as employees be chase then scholarships are remuneration for services, which is taxable.
That said, NIL is absolutely and should be taxable.
If you are a cheerleader in scholarship and hold cheerleading camps, that income is taxable. But the scholarship to go to school isnt a job.
Two points:
1. Getting athletes into a union and classified as an employee is a disaster for all parties.
2. I guess Congress could just carve out a college sports exemption on taxes.
Now we're talking.While we are at it, end 501(c)3 status. Times have changed