Reading this board, you could now easily come to the conclusion that going to a BCS game was bad, and having the top WBB basketball program in the country is bad.
Bull****. The idea is to ****ing win. At everything. As much as possible. Florida once fired its softball coach for losing a home regional to Bethune-Cookman. It doesn't mean they stopped caring about football - it means they want to win. At softball. Same as everything else. In fact, when the SEC programs all added softball in the Title IX boom of the mid-90's, they all built multi-million dollar stadiums and hired the best coaches to try to win right away. Florida started women's lacrosse two years ago and was ranked #1 in the nation this year before being upset in the semis. This notion that you can't spend money on more than one thing would be silly to the folks down in SEC country. They don't compete half-assed in anything.
So why does our fanbase turn our successes into negatives? It was not a negative that we made a BCS bowl in our sixth or seventh year in I-A. It was awesome. And OU did not embarrass us - it was 34-20 in the fourth quarter and we had the ball in their territory. Pitt fared much worse against Utah a year or two prior. It is not a negative that we have the flagship program in any sport, much less one that brings in good ratings for ESPN in March.