What I am amazed at is posters, in attempting to make a point, are taking turns denigrating our two great coaches, both of whom will end up being in the Top Ten best college coaches of all time once Dan is done. Are you really looking for a weakness on Hurley's resume, one of 4 coaches all-time who has won back-to-back titles, to make your point. And Calhoun has been criticized here because he never won BTB or had an occasional near-.500 year? Did you forget that Boeheim called Calhoun's building of the program at the state ag school the greatest program build in history?
This topic has been taken totally off the rails. You should feel ashamed saying anything negative about these two icons.