The ratings are like BBQ sauces-regional, highly dependent on personal taste, based on unknown but traditional recipes. Asking which is the most accurate is like asking which is the best BBQ sauce. Blue Star has tracked best with UCONN successful players over the years and has been accused of having an east coast (regional) bias and is aligned with the Philly Belles AAU organization. All Star Girls Report tend to find the hidden gems and predicted stardom for Gabby Williams when hardly anyone else did at a time when Gabby was injured. Prospects Nation grew out of ESPN Hoopgurlz and those two tend to be in sync because these common rating principles.
1) They do not rate players unless they have seen them play live
2) The rating are based on a projection of the position the player is expected to play at the college level
3) Injured player tend to drop but not significantly.
4) HS level of competition is highly highly discounted instead they tend to rely heavily on AAU showcase tournaments and USA basketball trials.
Although Prospects Nation grew out of ESPN Hoopgurlz and have nearly the same rating philosophies you will occasionally find huge discrepancies in the ratings. The explanations for the discrepancies can usually be traced by to one of those items listed as 1-4 previously....
The rating should definitely be averaged and out of that average you get much more useful information.
There are 3 posters that have done composite ratings.
@meyers7 ,
@vowelguy and
@WBBfolllwer.
The 2020 Composite ranking is some where in this thread.
While we are on the subject of ratings/rankings might as well talk about this since it comes up every year. Each year there is a vast disparity in rankings or ratings between the services for a few players. Examples from the past: 2019 Kennedy Brown #20 in ESPN: #100 by Prospectsnation 2018...
the-boneyard.com