Disagree with them trading anyone....would be a mistake if they did that. Keep those 3 and build around them. Everything else you said is spot on. McBride isn't a 3 and there's no way in hell Plum takes Moriah's starting position. Ever in her life.
What it means to MoJo is she has someone in the periphery to dish to when required. Moriah is he best when she has people to orchestrate with. Plum was in a unique positon in the PAC. I suspect she'll be eaten alive in the WNBA for a season or two, and then she'll be a pretty fine player who will join the Olympic team in 2020.
Disagree with them trading anyone....would be a mistake if they did that. Keep those 3 and build around them. Everything else you said is spot on. McBride isn't a 3 and there's no way in hell Plum takes Moriah's starting position. Ever in her life.
Indeed!!! If they were going to make a trade, they would have done so by now. I haven't heard of any trade rumors. My guess is Plum stays for the immediate future (long term if she can score like she did at Washington), unless a GM makes them an offer they can't refuse.
My friend, you are not looking in the right places. This from Howard Megdal (full article here - Kelsey Plum Went First in the WNBA Draft, And Now She's Stuck in Limbo | VICE Sports)
View attachment 21829
That sound you heard was my head hitting my desk repeatedly.
Kelsey wasn't the best fit in San Antonio, but she was too good to pass up, and the second-best player wasn't good enough. I have no idea what their trade options were, but there wasn't mutual agreement. It looks as if Kelsey may stay there, and we'll see how the lineup works.
SA was scoring challenged in the extreme last year, especially after KMac got hurt. A player with 3,500 points remedies that nicely. They were painful to watch at times last year. I expect their scoring to increase by 10 ppg this year. Even if Kelsey isn't a perfect fit, the scoring punch was much needed.I. For Ruth to walk away from the trade and keep Plum, she must have at least some confidence that KMac can play the 3 and that also she can adjust to playing a little more without the ball, a la Maya, which I think she does well. Question becomes can she defend the other starting 3's out there in the league? Hard to say for sure but we'll see. The Stars may try to bring more of an aggressive pressure/trapping defense on the perimeter to mask their lack of size at the 1-2-3 spots. I trust Mo and KMac in this scenario, but is Plum up to that task? If so, or if eventually so, it could work out.
II. OTOH, Ruth and the coaches may just want to see how Plum looks in the first year. ( I assume she could also be part of a trade next year? Or is there some restriction in rookie contracts that doesn't allow for that?) If she shows out this year, the trade could be worked next year.
III. It may just be that they walked away simply because they couldn't get the value they wanted and there is no particular plan for what comes next! In that case, maybe it will just be "Score, baby! Score!" and see where the defensive chips fall.
#III is my guess, FWIW.I. For Ruth to walk away from the trade and keep Plum, she must have at least some confidence that KMac can play the 3 and that also she can adjust to playing a little more without the ball, a la Maya, which I think she does well. Question becomes can she defend the other starting 3's out there in the league? Hard to say for sure but we'll see. The Stars may try to bring more of an aggressive pressure/trapping defense on the perimeter to mask their lack of size at the 1-2-3 spots. I trust Mo and KMac in this scenario, but is Plum up to that task? If so, or if eventually so, it could work out.
II. OTOH, Ruth and the coaches may just want to see how Plum looks in the first year. ( I assume she could also be part of a trade next year? Or is there some restriction in rookie contracts that doesn't allow for that?) If she shows out this year, the trade could be worked next year.
III. It may just be that they walked away simply because they couldn't get the value they wanted and there is no particular plan for what comes next! In that case, maybe it will just be "Score, baby! Score!" and see where the defensive chips fall.
#III is my guess, FWIW.
I agree about the lack of size on defense, but ...I don't see a problem playing all three or rotating among the three and Mo is capable of playing off the ball as well - on OFFENSE. The problem I see is defensively with Mo and Plum both 'undersized' - the college scene is full of short guards and between playing full zone and not playing many tall back-courts you can get away with it, but the WNBA is full of good 6'+ guards, they do lots of scouting and exploiting of opponent's weaknesses, and playing two guards under 5'8" and a wing at 5'11" will be a nightmare. And not just straight up, but covering and rotating on screens.
After they play Seattle, and Washington, with Stewie, and EDD at the 3 they will realize that they need size at the 3.I. For Ruth to walk away from the trade and keep Plum, she must have at least some confidence that KMac can play the 3 and that also she can adjust to playing a little more without the ball, a la Maya, which I think she does well. Question becomes can she defend the other starting 3's out there in the league? Hard to say for sure but we'll see. The Stars may try to bring more of an aggressive pressure/trapping defense on the perimeter to mask their lack of size at the 1-2-3 spots. I trust Mo and KMac in this scenario, but is Plum up to that task? If so, or if eventually so, it could work out.
II. OTOH, Ruth and the coaches may just want to see how Plum looks in the first year. ( I assume she could also be part of a trade next year? Or is there some restriction in rookie contracts that doesn't allow for that?) If she shows out this year, the trade could be worked next year.
III. It may just be that they walked away simply because they couldn't get the value they wanted and there is no particular plan for what comes next! In that case, maybe it will just be "Score, baby! Score!" and see where the defensive chips fall.
Are Stewie and EDD playing the 3 or 4?After they play Seattle, and Washington, with Stewie, and EDD at the 3 they will realize that they need size at the 3.
Seattle picked up the liberty center Carolyn Swords to play center, Crystal Langhorne should start at 1 forward, and Stewie at the other. Alysha Clark will go to the bench. Seattle was one of the worst rebounding teams, even with Stewie.Are Stewie and EDD playing the 3 or 4?
Right. I think Stewie played the 4, with Clark at the 3 and Langhorne at the 5 last year. This year may be different.Seattle picked up the liberty center Carolyn Swords to play center, Crystal Langhorne should start at 1 forward, and Stewie at the other. Alysha Clark will go to the bench. Seattle was one of the worst rebounding teams, even with Stewie.
I thought Stewart spent a lot of time as the 5 especially on defense - not ideal.Right. I think Stewie played the 4, with Clark at the 3 and Langhorne at the 5 last year. This year may be different.
Hopefully!Is Swords a starter?
Hopefully!
She started all 34 games last year even though she only played 17.5 mpg. Seattle needs another center, but Swords is an improvement.