- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 22,312
- Reaction Score
- 54,552
How exactly do you propose we have 3000 players and 500+ coaches decide?Let the players and Coaches decide.
How exactly do you propose we have 3000 players and 500+ coaches decide?Let the players and Coaches decide.
Have any schools gotten COVID from a team that they have played?
Maybe we can set up a BY poll and have them vote that way.How exactly do you propose we have 3000 players and 500+ coaches decide?
I think this is true. One problem is that significant relief from the virus is still several months away. That timeline just doesn't solve the problem for a sport that normally ends it's season in March. Better to try to finish this as best they can.A one or two month hiatus would come and go and the same public health factors would still be in play, so play on.
Why does it have to end in March? Nothing else about this year is normal.I think this is true. One problem is that significant relief from the virus is still several months away. That timeline just doesn't solve the problem for a sport that normally ends it's season in March. Better to try to finish this as best they can.
How exactly do you propose we have 3000 players and 500+ coaches decide?
Don't think the season will be allowed to fizzle because of the pot of goal at the end of the rainbow know as Mens NCAA tournament. The NCAA Men's tournament is the main source of revenue which funds most athletic scholarship. Fortunately the NCAA had a cancellation insurance policy last year. It is unclear if a similar insurance policy exists in the event of cancellation of the tournament this season thus the NCAA will do everything possible to make the tournament happen.You know, the virus is shutting down the season on its own. So many teams have "paused" basketball activities, and according to the Washington Post, over 6,000 Division I athletes have tested positive since this began.
Could be that the season just fizzles out as the virus spreads. No actual decision by the leagues needed.
Actually only one was cancelled, the others were postponed, a big difference.61 games today ; 17 cancelled. (28%)
Pretty simple, like Duke , each team decides for itself....got it?How exactly do you propose we have 3000 players and 500+ coaches decide?
If you read my initial post it involved pushing the entire tournament back. That can’t be decided on a team by team basis.Pretty simple, like Duke , each team decides for itself....got it?
My creative writing professor would accuse you of creating one straw man to prop up another. Why not cancel the games and keep the players in their cocoons instead of sending them home? AKA exactly what Duke WBB is doing.There seems to be this pervasive assumption that playing the season puts players at a greater risk of contracting Covid, when exactly the opposite is true.
Cancel the season, remove the players from their protective cocoon, and send them back into the real world that we all are dealing with.
Does anyone here really think that’s the answer?
Keep them on their teams, safe.
Last reply, if a team suspends their season, I am assuming ( Ivy League) would not be eligible for any NCAA tournament, regardless of when. The men have chosen a bubble format and the women will do likewise in Texas.If you read my initial post it involved pushing the entire tournament back. That can’t be decided on a team by team basis.
The thread is about the NCAA declaring a pause.Last reply, if a team suspends their season, I am assuming ( Ivy League) would not be eligible for any NCAA tournament, regardless of when. The men have chosen a bubble format and the women will do likewise in Texas.
Last that I heard is that they are looking at a bubble format for the women, but haven't said it is going to be in Texas yet.Last reply, if a team suspends their season, I am assuming ( Ivy League) would not be eligible for any NCAA tournament, regardless of when. The men have chosen a bubble format and the women will do likewise in Texas.
My creative writing professor would accuse you of creating one straw man to prop up another. Why not cancel the games and keep the players in their cocoons instead of sending them home? AKA exactly what Duke WBB is doing.
Where are you getting this? I never ever said players are safe in their cocoons.I would agree with you if players are catching the virus from an opponent during a game but the fact is that the virus is being transmitted in the cocoon environment you say is safe. Can you name even one proven case of a player catching the virus from an opponent?
It's not the games that are risky, it's what happens away from the court. Mulkey caught it at home. UConn's pause was due to someone catching the virus away from the school.
Let's stop with the wild assumptions that games are the danger.
COCO: "Why not cancel the games and keep the players in their cocoons instead of sending them home?"Where are you getting this? I never ever said players are safe in their cocoons.
Why are you so obsessed with Mulkey and where she caught the virus? IDC.