Shocking! ESPN's Way Too Early has UConn 7th! | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Shocking! ESPN's Way Too Early has UConn 7th!

Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
3,944
Reaction Score
15,055

bballnut90

LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
7,044
Reaction Score
30,682
They lost Collier and Samuelson, who have been pillars to the team the last few years.

2011 they lost NPOY Tina Charles--> Final Four
2012 they lost an all time great in Moore -->Final Four
2015 they lost pillars Dolson and Hartley-->Championship
2017 they lost the top 3 WNBA picks (including Stewart)--> Final Four
2019 they lost 2 DPOY and their only post presence (all 1st round picks)-->Final Four

See a trend?
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
2,052
Reaction Score
8,316
After top eight, maybe top four, this is throwing darts blindfolded. That Oregon wins it all is almost a given. Baylor could make it to 2nd but I wouldn't be surprised if they lost in elite eight. Stanford should rattle a lot of cages. Other teams ranked above UConn or just below come with as many questions as Huskies. This is fun but let's play a half dozen games first.
 

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,868
Reaction Score
26,702
Saying that Danielle Cosgrove is going to become a starter for ND while failing to mention Danielle Patterson or Mikayla Vaughn shows the level of care and knowledge (shockingly little!) that goes into the production of this article.

I would rank UConn 4th.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,390
Reaction Score
69,709
I got my eye on Middle Tennessee. Anastasia Hayes, Rellah Boothe, and Eternati Willock. I think they will make some noise.
Will definitely tune in to some of their games next year. Curious to see if coach Insell can get those players to play as a cohesive unit. The C-USA race should come down to MTSU or Rice, which returns Ogwumike, Mulkey and some other experienced contributors.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,390
Reaction Score
69,709
Saying that Danielle Cosgrove is going to become a starter for ND while failing to mention Danielle Patterson or Mikayla Vaughn shows the level of care and knowledge (shockingly little!) that goes into the production of this article.
Perhaps the omission of Patterson was prescient? :cool:
 

triaddukefan

Tobacco Road Gastronomer
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,322
Reaction Score
58,862
I got my eye on Middle Tennessee. Anastasia Hayes, Rellah Boothe, and Eternati Willock. I think they will make some noise.

Dont forget about RaShika White... transfer from Elon will be eligible this season. 6'4" and was the Colonial Six Player of the Year in 2017-18. Averaged almost 13pts... 6 rebounds... and 1.3 blocks coming off the bench.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,760
Reaction Score
45,386
I got my eye on Middle Tennessee. Anastasia Hayes, Rellah Boothe, and Eternati Willock. I think they will make some noise.

I'm not sure how many games they'll win but any team with Rellah Boothe will definitely make some noise...............:rolleyes:
 

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,868
Reaction Score
26,702
Perhaps the omission of Patterson was prescient? :cool:

Maybe :(.

Man, she appeared to have friends outside of the basketball team and had just started a podcast that was promoted by the Athletics department. Would never have figured her to want to transfer.

Then again, it seemed like McGraw would pull her anytime she made a single mistake. Maybe she wants a coach with a bit lighter touch. It seemed like this would be the year that Muffet would finally be forced to let her just play through the mistakes.

Anyway, Creme is still wrong. Brunelle will start instead of Cosgrove.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
2,052
Reaction Score
8,316
PAC-12 will continue as top conference, improving top to bottom, even bottom Colorado who struggled after losing top player to injury but nearly beat Stanford. They add New Zealand's 6'4" Charlotte Whittaker at post. Remember that name.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,390
Reaction Score
69,709
I am fine with UConn at #7. All 6 teams ahead of them were in the good-to-great range AND return most of their firepower.

I say Notre Dame is too low at #17. I don't care that they graduated all their starters and I don't care that they just lost Patterson. They may drop some games early with their inexperienced lineup, but I predict that Peoples and/or Brunelle will be a force as freshmen, and Vaughn and Nixon will also make leaps. By February they will be a top 10 team.
 

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,868
Reaction Score
26,702
And here I thought you were the social media maven!

You scooped me this time...rough finding out one of your team's players wants to transfer via sunglasses guy emoji.
 
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Messages
2,200
Reaction Score
6,888
This Way to Early forecast is as good as any I have seen. Oregon is going to be very talented next season. Stanford & Oregon State will also compete for the PAC-12 championship, and Ducks are not a lock by any means. This is the 1st way to early forecast I have read that had Texas A&M in top 5, and, I agree that Texas A&M will be extremely talented next season.
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,390
Reaction Score
69,709
You scooped me this time...rough finding out one of your team's players wants to transfer via sunglasses guy emoji.
Eh, you got D. Walker and lost Patterson. Net gain, I'd say.
 

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,868
Reaction Score
26,702
Eh, you got D. Walker and lost Patterson. Net gain, I'd say.

I don't know - I really liked Patterson's potential and was excited to see what she could do with more minutes.

Also, ND is now incredibly thin in the post (only Cosgrove to backup likely starters Brunelle and Vaughn).
 
Joined
May 5, 2017
Messages
499
Reaction Score
1,140
This Way to Early forecast is as good as any I have seen. Oregon is going to be very talented next season. Stanford & Oregon State will also compete for the PAC-12 championship, and Ducks are not a lock by any means. This is the 1st way to early forecast I have read that had Texas A&M in top 5, and, I agree that Texas A&M will be extremely talented next season.
Also, Charlie Creme emphasizes Oregon State's great front line height "Oregon State will have size to spare with incoming freshman 6-6 Kennedy Brown and 6-3 Taylor Jones to go along with 6-9 Andrea Aquino, who redshirted this season, and 6-7 Patricia Morris..." But, he wrote this before 6-9 Jelena Mitrovic signed as yet another big incoming freshman! What would he say now?? Oregon State will have way, way, way more size to spare?? (how good or not they will be individually is the question)
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Messages
1,328
Reaction Score
2,378
I was surprised when one of the other “too early” polls had Mississippi State at 12. To have MSU at 8 is extremely generous. Two players that are key to the season (Bibby and P Taylor) are coming off knee and foot injuries respectively. Even if both are healthy Bibby and maybe Espinoza-Hunter are the only players any analyst could reasonably predict as a shoe in for starting positions.
 

TheFarmFan

Stanford Fan, Huskies Admirer
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
1,938
Reaction Score
13,752
Also, Charlie Creme emphasizes Oregon State's great front line height "Oregon State will have size to spare with incoming freshman 6-6 Kennedy Brown and 6-3 Taylor Jones to go along with 6-9 Andrea Aquino, who redshirted this season, and 6-7 Patricia Morris..." But, he wrote this before 6-9 Jelena Mitrovic signed as yet another big incoming freshman! What would he say now?? Oregon State will have way, way, way more size to spare?? (how good or not they will be individually is the question)
Because it's Scott Rueck, I'll give him some tremendous benefit of the doubt, but I'm really curious to see how his team gels together next year. He has a 5'7" point guard (Slocum), three shooting guards at or below 6' (Goodman at 5'9", Pivec at 5'10" and Tudor at 6'), and then like 5 players at 6'5" or taller. And Slocum in particular likes to push the pace, which probably would be hard to maintain with several very tall, lumbering posts. And IMHO, I thought part of Grymek's problem last season was that her plane of ball movement was not even close to being at the same level as her teammates, so lob passes to her were very diagonal, it was hard to get the ball inside to her off a bounce pass because it'd end up at her knees half the time, and she wasn't effective at kicking it back out for inside out opportunities. I'm not sure why, but somehow Gulich's 6'5" seemed like a much more manageable size to get the ball in and out.

So despite some impressive roster stats It's not obvious to me how these players are all going to fit together, but I'm sure Rueck will figure it out, and it'll be fun to watch.
 
Last edited:

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,868
Reaction Score
26,702
Is Brunelle definitely settled on as a post? She seemed to play more of a wing role in the McD's and JBC games; more of a sharpshooter and less of a presence in the paint - across both games I don't remember her taking a single shot within 15 feet of the basket, and she didn't have a block in either game. And at 6'2" isn't exactly a dominating inside presence (I realize Pheesa was only 6'2" also, but Pheesa was both more athletic and had much better presence and movement inside the paint.). Just wondering cause I could see her in more of an Erin Boley like role with better defense and speed. But maybe that's not what ND will need next season?

On signing day, McGraw emphasized her 3-point shooting and how important it was to get a shooter with Mabrey graduating. So I think they'll find a way to get her behind the three-point line. But I've always thought she was a 4 in ND's system.

I think Vaughn and Cosgrove will handle the low post duties but Brunelle will have to play the 4 out of necessity. With Patterson at 4, she could possibly have logged some minutes at 3.
 

Carnac

That venerable sage from the west
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
15,932
Reaction Score
78,988
Is UConn at #7 more shocking than ND at #17?

Not sure why people are ripping MIN at #18. His rationale isn’t bad. They were down a starter all season. Whalen should be a little savvier this year.

We’ve got 2 question marks in our starting lineup next season. ND has 5. Plus, we have 3 returning starters with experience, they don’t. Until they post some wins (plural) over top 15 teams, I’ll take a wait and see approach.

Right now, I don’t think #17 is unreasonable. Water always seeks its own level. If they are a good team early on, they will rise quickly in the rankings.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
2,924
Total visitors
2,994

Forum statistics

Threads
156,791
Messages
4,064,449
Members
9,943
Latest member
jjblox


Top Bottom