Shizzle's bracketology (21/22 March Madness) | The Boneyard

Shizzle's bracketology (21/22 March Madness)

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,153
Reaction Score
19,098
First four out: St. Mary's, Texas A&M, VaTech, and Wichita State.

Last four in: Rutgers, Syracuse, Drake, Florida

West regional: (#1 overall)
1 Gonzaga vs. 16 New Orleans/Texas Southern
8 Maryland vs. 9 Dayton
4 Virginia vs. 13 Buffalo
5 Xavier vs. 12 Rutgers/Florida
3 Florida State vs. 14 Bucknell
6 St. Bonaventure vs. 11 Drake/Syracuse
7 Wisconsin vs. 10 Seton Hall
2 Alabama vs. 15 New Mexico State

East regional: (#4 overall)
1 Nova vs. 16 Weber State
8 Memphis vs. 9 Arizona
4 Purdue vs. 13 Liberty
5 UNC vs. 12 Belmont
3 Houston vs. 14 Hofstra
6 Michigan State vs. 11 VCU
7 UConn vs. 10 UCLA
2 Kentucky vs. 15 UC Santa Barbara

South regional: (#2 overall)
1 Kansas vs. 16 NCCU/Mt. St. Mary's
8 Ohio State vs. 9 St. John's
4 San Diego State vs. 13 Western Kentucky
5 Arkansas vs. 12 Yale
3 Texas vs. 14 Winthrop
6 Auburn vs. 11 Louisville
7 Iowa vs. 10 Oklahoma
2 Oregon vs. 15 East Tennessee State University

Midwest regional: (#3 overall)
1 Michigan vs. 16 South Dakota State
8 Creighton vs. 9 N.C. State
4 Illinois vs. 13 Vermont
5 WVU vs. 12 Iona
3 Tennessee vs. 14 Georgia State
6 Loyola vs. 11 Colorado State
7 Baylor vs. 10 BYU
2 Duke vs. 15 Northern Kentucky

Multi-bid leagues:
B1G: 9
ACC: 7
SEC: 6
Big East: 6
Big 12: 5
Pac-12: 3
A-10: 3
AAC: 2
MVC: 2
MW: 2
WCC: 2
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
15,467
Reaction Score
87,807
UCLA is #2 in both preseason polls. That would be quite a fall to a 10 seed. What don't you like about them?
 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,153
Reaction Score
19,098
UCLA is #2 in both preseason polls. That would be quite a fall to a 10 seed.
They are monumentally overrated. I wouldn't be surprised if they missed the field. They are living off of a three-week run, and the Pac-12 is not very good.
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
15,467
Reaction Score
87,807
They are monumentally overrated. I wouldn't be surprised if they missed the field. They are living off of a three-week run, and the Pac-12 is not very good.
O.K. just saw your explanation in the other thread. We'll see, I guess.

 

shizzle787

King Shizzle DCCLXXXVII of the Cesspool
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
12,153
Reaction Score
19,098
How the hell does any person not working for a sports site have the time to do this?
Believe it or not, it only took me about 45 minutes.
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
7,315
Reaction Score
59,819
They are monumentally overrated. I wouldn't be surprised if they missed the field. They are living off of a three-week run, and the Pac-12 is not very good.
HARD disagree.

90% of their scoring returned and they patched their biggest weakness (rim-protection) by picking up Myles Johnson.

Jaquez and Juzang are a unique/tough defensive assignment too. How to you prep for a team whose two best offensive players are 6’7 210+ wings?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,018
Reaction Score
70,720
[UCLA] are monumentally overrated. I wouldn't be surprised if they missed the field. They are living off of a three-week run, and the Pac-12 is not very good.
It's fine to think they're a bit overrated. It's crazy to think they're the 40th best team.

I guess you blacked out that the P12 got 3 Elite 8 teams last year (and Oregon lost to USC in tourny also).
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
15,467
Reaction Score
87,807
HARD disagree.

90% of their scoring returned and they patched their biggest weakness (rim-protection) by picking up Myles Johnson.

Jaquez and Juzang are a unique/tough defensive assignment too. How to you prep for a team whose two best offensive players are 6’7 210+ wings?
They also have a projected lottery pick in 2022 in freshman Peyton Watson. Granted you never know what a freshman will give you but when you bring back almost everyone and add a projected lottery pick I don't see how that doesn't help.

Rounding off the top seven prospects and what I'd say the last of the sure-fire lottery picks is UCLA's Peyton Watson. There's a big drop-off after him.

Watson could certainly see his stock climb this season. The 6-foot-8 wing is long, wiry and is an electric athlete. He has terrific ball skills for a wing and makes for an outstanding slasher in the half-court and in transition.

Watson is an impressive passer for a wing and coupled with his physical tools and his ball skills, I'd be intrigued to see him on the ball more this year. It would help his game.

UCLA does return its full starting five returning after an incredible Final Four run, so Watson has time to settle in and come into his own as a player and will see his role increasingly grow throughout the course of the season. He can help from the jump defensively at least.


 
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
15,467
Reaction Score
87,807
They are monumentally overrated. I wouldn't be surprised if they missed the field. They are living off of a three-week run, and the Pac-12 is not very good.
So if UCLA is monumentally overrated is Villanova also? Obviously it's only 1 game but if you're right then that wasn't good for Villanova last night.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
1,634
Reaction Score
8,530
Based on the small sample size (one game..lol) I see us more as a 4 or 5 seed. Time will tell!
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,758
Reaction Score
23,733
They are monumentally overrated. I wouldn't be surprised if they missed the field. They are living off of a three-week run, and the Pac-12 is not very good.
That’s what people said last year and then they got 5 teams into the sweeet sixteen… Pac is getting just as many if not more teams into the tourney than the BE this year…right now we only have 4 projected. Not great.

If nova isn’t the best team in the BE then we are and I’m not ready to say we’re beating UCLA on the road …
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
369
Guests online
2,263
Total visitors
2,632

Forum statistics

Threads
158,830
Messages
4,169,949
Members
10,041
Latest member
Simon


.
Top Bottom