We can be one game behind Xavier if Seton Hall wins and we beat St John's.Tonight its Seton Hall vs Xavier at 6:30 on FS1. I think as a UConn fan I would root for Xavier because Seton Hall is right below us in the conference. So we need Seton Hall to lose.
Yea I’m not concerned with Seton Hall. We just need to keep winning.We can be one game behind Xavier if Seton Hall wins and we beat St John's.
Then don't we need you to give us which team to root for based on the loser projecting outto have better victories in their final games to counteract the loss so that they both contribute to the maximum NET boost?We need to root for both teams for NET rankings.
They beat us twice though so we’d need them to go 0-3 and us 3-0 to jump them. Very unlikely.We can be one game behind Xavier if Seton Hall wins and we beat St John's.
Then don't we need you to give us which team to root for based on the loser projecting outto have better victories in their final games to counteract the loss so that they both contribute to the maximum NET boost?
Is that even possible?
And will really it matter?
I would like to see Seton Hall somehow squeak into the tourney. More Big East teams in the tourney is always good.The short answer is no, it doesn't. People assume that because the Committee has to start somewhere, and they start by grouping teams by quads, that they are so stupid and arbitrary that ultimately they give weight when actually comparing two teams carefully to whether they beat the 49 NET team or the 51 NET team.
We play every team in the conference twice. In terms of NCAA seedings, it means little who wins conference games that we're not in. If you're rooting to catch X, or stay ahead of the Hall, or making sure that Creighton doesn't finish 4th so we wouldn't play it until the finals, then take your pick. I'm rooting for Seton Hall because I badly want either X or Providence to finish behind Creighton and keep it on the opposite side of the bracket from us.
The quads are on their team sheets in shorthand records and all the games are listed grouped by quad. So the quads are on the teamsheets twice. It's absolutely a subliminal psychological effect as opposed to a real overt criteria,The short answer is no, it doesn't. People assume that because the Committee has to start somewhere, and they start by grouping teams by quads, that they are so stupid and arbitrary that ultimately they give weight when actually comparing two teams carefully to whether they beat the 49 NET team or the 51 NET team.
We play every team in the conference twice. In terms of NCAA seedings, it means little who wins conference games that we're not in. If you're rooting to catch X, or stay ahead of the Hall, or making sure that Creighton doesn't finish 4th so we wouldn't play it until the finals, then take your pick. I'm rooting for Seton Hall because I badly want either X or Providence to finish behind Creighton and keep it on the opposite side of the bracket from us.
Anyone have any information on Freemantle’s injury timeline? Will he be back for the BET?
After that first half, I've got my doubtsI would like to see Seton Hall somehow squeak into the tourney. More Big East teams in the tourney is always good.
I CAN DREAM CAN'T IThey beat us twice though so we’d need them to go 0-3 and us 3-0 to jump them. Very unlikely.
Seton Hall: yes. Nova: maybe. DePaul: no.The Top 5 of the BE are a large notch above the rest of the league. That being said, Seton Hall, Nova and even DePaul are good enough that they would be in the top 2-3 of the AAC
Was always gonna be a multiple year rebuild, which makes our loss to them even more annoyingnot looking good for the hall