2016 Audit data doesn't break out AD revenue.
The 990 (2014) data lists athletic revenue $6.5M, was the remaining $23.5M school support?
(See Part VIII 2(e).)
Has anyone from the BY legal staff figured out what the payout would be on the contract before signing someone new?Hey you are barking up the wrong tree. It is stairmasters who thinks we can't get a good coach due to the economic state of CT and Ollie's big contract. I think DB will make the move at the end of the year and we will be fine. I mean maybe not the UCONN of old but at least close to a Gonzaga level of challenging top teams year in and year out.
Oh, I'm just giving you a hard a time.
It seems your general line of argument across all Boneyard threads is "everything PC does is good and righteous and everything UConn does is bad."
It's easier to be relevant in the NBE because all the BIG DOGS left.
The suggestion that joining the NBE would generate a windfall for UConn is a complete fallacy. People are conflating issues, judging revenue solely on basketball specific TV deals, and simply using bad data.
In year ending June 2015 the gross revenue of the NBE was $42.6M, Their media deal paid out $31.6M (or $3.16M per school). Of course. . . there are expenses. The net payout for teams in the conference averaged less than $3M, which ranged from Creighton's payout of $2.2M to top earner Villanova's $3.7M. For year ending June 2016 the NBE revenue climbed to $45.8M. Assuming expenses stay relatively consistent, you are talking about an extra $200K increase per school at best. Fox back-loaded this deal.
The AAC's revenue for year ending June 2016 was $79.3M, up $9M from the year prior, but still pretty lame. Of that, UConn pocketed $10.5M. Before you think it's all about NCAA Units/Exit Fees, Houston pocketed $7.1M. Even Tulsa pocketed $4.7M. Post Season Tournaments totaled $48M. Much of this was derived through the CFP, which will continue to increase (helping offset other decreases). The recent success of AAC football will add to the pot. Having said that, the AAC is still at a distinct disadvantage with regard to the P5. That's a fact.
Would UConn be better off collecting $3.7M, funding a FCS football team and outfitting 20+ olympic sports, like Villanova? I doubt it, at least financially. The $3.7 would not begin to cover the cost of doing so. We would likely have to scrap football altogether. Currently, it's pretty much a wash with regard to conference revenue, with our $7M edge (along with FBS attached revenue) going to subsidize a modest FBS effort. The difference is that AAC/P5 inclusion has much, much greater upside potential on many different levels, especially for a flagship university. Unfortunately, fan interest and some sports, including basketball, will take a hit in the short term, but it's still the right course of action. The upcoming TV deal will help determine whether that remains the case.
The Boneyard: where the only agreements are accidentalYou Don't get it. PC, Xavier, and Butler are bigtime because they make the round of 64. They never come close to winning it, but hey 7 teams from the NBE must mean something..
So let's trash the millions we have invested in football so we can charge head first into playing Marquette and Georgetown on FS-1 once a month.
Don't forget about bowl payouts either... bowl payouts are shared between all conference members regardless of who actually makes a bowl.
The Boneyard: where the only agreements are accidental
I actually caught on to that. It was more about the reaction to your post (and playing along with the joke)I was being sarcastic...i knew he was agreeing with me, but your post is funny. Good one.
Ollie sucks. Duh.If we were thumping our conference mates in Men's basketball on a regular basis then all this worry about conferences would fade away.Winning OOC games against decent opponets should also be doable. The problem is our inability to be top 3 in a conference we should be top 2 in year in and year out. Win, get in the big dance and do some damage. How has this become such a hard thing to do?