- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 10,424
- Reaction Score
- 49,456
I find it hard to get worked up by guys like him. The industry rewards hacky talking heads that can generate controversy and clicks. It is what it is.
Who are our “ better wins” than the 3 of them?No. No it isn’t “fair”. It’s reactionary. The season has been longer than 2 weeks. And we have better wins than all of them. We are their “good” win. So how can they have separated themselves from us??
By you and Seth’s logic Creighton has separated itself from providence…right?
Seth is clown shoes. No doubt.I find it hard to get worked up by guys like him. The industry rewards hacky talking heads that can generate controversy and clicks. It is what it is.
So you think a home win over #6 (for a day more) AP, #4 Kenpom, #4 NET is better than a nuetral win over the #4 AP, #5 KenPom, and #6 NET team?Who are our “ better wins” than the 3 of them?
Because by metrics all of them beating us is better than our best win.
You should think this stuff out.
Beating #5 KenPom Alabama on a neutral court is better than any of those 3 beating #4 KenPom UConn at homeWho are our “ better wins” than the 3 of them?
Because by metrics all of them beating us is better than our best win.
You should think this stuff out.
So those 3 have a higher Ken Pom win. Like I said.Beating #5 KenPom Alabama on a neutral court is better than any of those 3 beating #4 KenPom UConn at home
Whelp yeah I do. I think it was a bigger deal for them to beat us top 4 at time kenpom even at home than it was for us beating a top 20 or so ( at time ) Ken Pom team neutral. Sorry for believing in my team. And I think Bama is great.So you think a home win over #6 (for a day more) AP, #4 Kenpom, #4 NET is better than a nuetral win over the #4 AP, #5 KenPom, and #6 NET team?
No, you said a "better win" and "by metrics all of them beating us is better than our best win". And #5 on a neutral court is objectively a better win than #4 at home by all metrics. If you said we haven't beaten a higher ranked team you'd be correctSo those 3 have a higher Ken Pom win. Like I said.
No, you said “metrics”. You never specifically even mentioned KenPom. And suddenly “metrics” went to “metric”, but even with that, you are still wrong. I’d suggest looking around the college basketball landscape and check out the differences in performance between home, road, and neutral.So those 3 have a higher Ken Pom win. Like I said.
Whelp yeah I do. I think it was a bigger deal for them to beat us top 4 at time kenpom even at home than it was for us beating a top 20 or so ( at time ) Ken Pom team neutral. Sorry for believing in my team. And I think Bama is great.
But with the added context, it’s clearly a more impressive win…So those 3 have a higher Ken Pom win. Like I said.
Whelp yeah I do. I think it was a bigger deal for them to beat us top 4 at time kenpom even at home than it was for us beating a top 20 or so ( at time ) Ken Pom team neutral. Sorry for believing in my team. And I think Bama is great.
Alabama, Iowa state, creighton, ok state, Florida(on the road). We are top 3 in Q1 wins in the country. It was well thought out which is why I said wins(plural) not win(singular).Who are our “ better wins” than the 3 of them?
Because by metrics all of them beating us is better than our best win.
You should think this stuff out.
The Rose Colored Glassed Brigade out in full force here.No. No it isn’t “fair”. It’s reactionary. The season has been longer than 2 weeks. And we have better wins than all of them. We are their “good” win. So how can they have separated themselves from us??
By you and Seth’s logic Creighton has separated itself from providence…right?
1 game is “separation”. The conference is FAR from decided. Making that call 7 games into conference play is dumb. No one has separated themselves from anyone. A 2 game lead is not significant.The Rose Colored Glassed Brigade out in full force here.
We are talking Big East Conference here. The way conferences work is that you play games against people, and the ones that win the most games win the conference - no one cares about what happens out of conference with regards to conference standings. You will see from my deep analytics background how I have shown you the 2 game lead that the three leaders have carved out early in the season. This can also be referred to in human english by definition as "separation".
View attachment 83037You guys get so wrapped up about what words some weirdo legacy media failson makes grow up
The fact is UConn has played basically all of its hardest away game already the others have played few to none. Right now the top group has no road winners in games between them so there is a lot of game to play and will probably come down to who can win more of these away games1 game is “separation”. The conference is FAR from decided. Making that call 7 games into conference play is dumb. No one has separated themselves from anyone. A 2 game lead is not significant.
The Rose Colored Glassed Brigade out in full force here.
We are talking Big East Conference here. The way conferences work is that you play games against people, and the ones that win the most games win the conference - no one cares about what happens out of conference with regards to conference standings. You will see from my deep analytics background how I have shown you the 2 game lead that the three leaders have carved out early in the season. This can also be referred to in human english by definition as "separation".
View attachment 83037You guys get so wrapped up about what words some weirdo legacy media failson makes grow up
He excitedly pants like a puppy when he gets going, but what would you expect from the offspring of Lanny?He's always down on UConn. The Dookie is still butthurt about 1999 and 2004. And that is the truth.
Seth Davis is an idiot, but in terms of Big East chances here's the latest from Torvik
View attachment 83041
I’m seeing UConn at 4, Marquette at 11, Xavier at 17, Creighton at 18, Providence at 31, and the rest are also different.