Like you, I believe Heckel could start on many division 1 teams. I think she could start for some true contenders. Overall I think her stats relative to playing time were slightly better than KK or Ashlynn's freshmen seasons, but slightly behind their sophomore production. Heckel's main advantage would appear to be close to a lock for the backup PG minutes.KK and Shade have played on two ff teams. One they started on and the other they were first off the bench. Both played in a NC game and contributed to the win. But now, there are UConn fans who want to sit them in favor of a player who has played one season and never played in a FF and was a sub. We have seen KK and Shade play for two seasons now and know what they can do. How many games have we seen Heckel play in order to determine just how good she is? Based on what I saw of her in high school, I believe she is good enough to start on many D1 teams. But, for the life of me, I don't understand why there are so many posters who think that a player who has yet to learn the UConn system will be a better fit than two who have the system ingrained in them and have proven it.
Kelis is not quite as highly rated a recruit, and style wise appears to be more 1/2 or even 2 than a pure PG, and and good as Azzi and Ashlynn are, neither is a PG IMO. Heckel would insure we had a high level backup at that position, whereas Kelis might be, but might not too.