I still think it'll be a battle, but SC's depth will likely takeover as usual. The fact that SC can bring 5-6 off the bench and have very little drop off should be a concern to every other team that they'll face going forward.
Fair point. He might not have wanted the player to take a two 9 seconds into the possession either.
Despite the ugliness of it all, It was cool to see how loud vocal and active the fans were for a WBB game. The students and the rest of the fans treated it like it was one of the mens teams playing.
I was expecting some consistency from Florida this year. I was expecting them to be in the middle of the pack.
They are fun at times to watch. Sometimes I am watching their games and I cringe when I see the 1 vs 2 on the fast break. Like there is no way the Arkansas player is going to score in that situation. They don't. Spencer and Daniels had several plays like that. But Arkansas makes it fun.
www.clarionledger.com
I saw about Carter earlier. Poor girl just can’t catch a break. Wasn’t aware of Annie. Ugh.Terrible news for Mississippi State. Alasia Hayes and Ramoni Parker are currently out due to concussion and another unknown injury, respectively. Anastasia Hayes is out right now due to a personal matter (not discipline related according to Coach Purcell’s press conference and now this.
STARKVILLE — Mississippi State women's basketball will be without forward Denae Carter for an "extended period of time" due to a torn meniscus, a team spokesperson told the Clarion Ledger. The is no timetable for her return, but MSU is hopeful she will play again this season.
Carter is a sophomore who has appeared in 17 games this season − averaging 5.5 points and 5.8 rebounds − despite tearing her ACL last January.
Mississippi State basketball's Denae Carter to miss 'extended period' due to torn meniscus
Mississippi State women's basketball is hopeful forward Denae Carter can return this season after tearing her meniscus, per team spokesperson.
Why was it a great crowd? it was about average with 7,298 while the game before, Auburn had 11,475. The season average is 7,400
I didn’t realize J Barker was that big. She has a very powerful build. I was also impressed with J Malone. She has great size but moves very nimbly.
92-46 score is doubling up. So, yes
OMG!
Well here’s another reason:SC was 30-76 in shootings which includes 5-8 from 3 point land. That is simply atrocious shooting considering how much size advantage SC has that we would hope you could get all those missed bunny shots.
Well here’s another reason:SC was 30-76 in shootings which includes 5-8 from 3 point land. That is simply atrocious shooting considering how much size advantage SC has that we would hope you could get all those missed bunny shots.
Mic drop.In the 4th Period, South Carolina's starting 5 played a total of 0 of the possible 50 minutes, compared to Arkansas' starting five playing a total of 22 minutes. Those reserves for the Gamecocks shot 5-20 (25.0%) for the quarter, and pulled down 18 rebounds.
In the 1st Period, the Gamecocks shot 8-18 (44.4%) and pulled down 19 boards.
In the 2nd Period, they shot 9-18 (50.0%) and collected 19 rebounds.
In the 3rd Period, they shot 8-20 (40.0%) and pulled down 18 rebounds.
Through the first 3 quarters of play, the Gamecocks shot 25-56 (44.6%) and pulled down 56 rebounds. The 44.6% accuracy is not far from their season average of 47.6% which is just outside of top 10 nationally, and would be a top 50 national ranking for FG % which is decent, and certainly does not fall into "simply atrocious" as a category. The 56 rebounds would lead the nation if it was the season average.
Conclusion:
The Gamecocks did NOT shoot at a "simply atrocious" rate for much of their game versus Arkansas as the respondent claimed, but actually shot decent to excellent throughout the first 3 quarters, and STILL generated high rebounding numbers. In fact, in the 1st half, the Gamecocks shot 17-36 (47.2%) and still collected MORE rebounds than they did in the 2nd half, when they shot 13-40 (32.5%). Based on Respondent's theory, one would have expected the Gamecocks to have pulled down MORE rebounds - and not less - rebounds in the 2nd half, than they pulled down in the 1st half.
It needed to be done. And I’m thankful for Conway because I don’t have the bandwidth haha..
I think I heard "oh snap" somewhere when I finished reading that post.In the 4th Period, South Carolina's starting 5 played a total of 0 of the possible 50 minutes, compared to Arkansas' starting five playing a total of 22 minutes. Those reserves for the Gamecocks shot 5-20 (25.0%) for the quarter, and pulled down 18 rebounds.
In the 1st Period, the Gamecocks shot 8-18 (44.4%) and pulled down 19 boards.
In the 2nd Period, they shot 9-18 (50.0%) and collected 19 rebounds.
In the 3rd Period, they shot 8-20 (40.0%) and pulled down 18 rebounds.
Through the first 3 quarters of play, the Gamecocks shot 25-56 (44.6%) and pulled down 56 rebounds. The 44.6% accuracy is not far from their season average of 47.6% which is just outside of top 10 nationally, and would be a top 50 national ranking for FG % which is decent, and certainly does not fall into "simply atrocious" as a category. The 56 rebounds would lead the nation if it was the season average.
Conclusion:
The Gamecocks did NOT shoot at a "simply atrocious" rate for much of their game versus Arkansas as the respondent claimed, but actually shot decent to excellent throughout the first 3 quarters, and STILL generated high rebounding numbers. In fact, in the 1st half, the Gamecocks shot 17-36 (47.2%) and still collected MORE rebounds than they did in the 2nd half, when they shot 13-40 (32.5%). Based on Respondent's theory, one would have expected the Gamecocks to have pulled down MORE rebounds - and not less - rebounds in the 2nd half, than they pulled down in the 1st half.
Its not going to matter. LSU will get embarrassed by both teams.
They have road games at Tennessee, LSU and Alabama and still have to play South Carolina at home, not to mention a couple middle of the road teams that could jump up and get them.
