CL82
NCAA Woman's Basketball National Champions
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 62,706
- Reaction Score
- 242,613
Last year it was, "we have Paige and you don't", this year it's "we have Sarah and you don't".
Last year it was, "we have Paige and you don't", this year it's "we have Sarah and you don't".
May have to expand the saying: "We have Azzi & Sarah, and you do not!"
Even more impressive because Box Plus/Minus is probably the best single stat to measure a player's performance. A comprehensive stat that also takes into account pace and quality of the competition. Sarah's numbers were actually slightly better than Paige last year, and of course are even better this year.Strong's career Box Plus/Minus average of +25.6 is the best of any player in the 23-year records of Basketball Reference, and by a huge margin. Five of the top seven are Huskies.
Plus/minus shows how the score changes while the player is on the court. If someone’s +/- is 5, her team scored 5 more points than the opponent while she was playing. It’s a stat that’s purely mathematical; no factoring in quality of opponent or anything else. And keep in mind, it’s possible for a player to have a positive +/- even when her team losesEven more impressive because Box Plus/Minus is probably the best single stat to measure a player's performance. A comprehensive stat that also takes into account pace and quality of the competition. Sarah's numbers were actually slightly better than Paige last year, and of course are even better this year.
She is exceptional in every way. Just exceptional - what a talented and skilled player - a joy to watch. I will follow her career all the way out - amazing young woman.I know I am stating the obvious as we all are seeing the same thing. Her play this year is so much better than last year. Who would think that was possible?
One play, she blocks a pass at half court, saves it from going out of bounds, and then drives to the rim and scores. Crazy.
The only player, IMO, who was close to that was Maya Moore.
The Peacock Play by Play woman says that Sarah looks like she is playing against children.
Geno in his press conference, where he is mostly guarded about over praising, stated that Sarah just makes difficult plays look simple, when they are really not. She is so competitive that missing ONE shot makes her angry, and with everything she does, diving one the floor is not beneath her.
He said her rebounding is more impressive to him that her shooting, as she is always near where the ball is going.
You can see it in his face that he and his coaches know how special a player she is.
I agree. She is quite an intimidator in the lane. Apart from specific stats like blocks/game, like Stewie she intimidates even opposing bigs. Other teams try to play around them. Also, her end-to-end ball skills are unparalleled by any other big in the game. And I think her passing skills are next level, literally.So how will she match up with the past UConn greats as time goes on? I always have liked Stewie as the best, separating herself from the others because of her defensive skills. But Sarah is quite the defensive force, so maybe......
BPM is a good composite measure, more readily available than other composite individual efficiency measures (EFFiciency, PER, PIE, NetRtg etc.).Even more impressive because Box Plus/Minus is probably the best single stat to measure a player's performance. A comprehensive stat that also takes into account pace and quality of the competition. Sarah's numbers were actually slightly better than Paige last year, and of course are even better this year.
Thanks for these fascinating stats, especially the second chart. The assists and ORB numbers are pretty striking, as is the 3pt% and the FGA/game. We're taking and making more 3s than any UConn team in the last 15 years. The 2P% is near the top, but this will probably approach last year's once the conference schedule starts. The O-boards are in the top 5 and that will also likely rise in conference. The overall comparison to the greatest 4 year stretch in D1 history is pretty eye-opening.BPM is a good composite measure, more readily available than other composite individual efficiency measures (EFFiciency, PER, PIE, NetRtg etc.).
However, BPM is a cohort measure. Per game BPM is the sum of a player’s rotations' BPMs — how effective are those rotations against the opponent’s rotations on offense and defense and how many possessions those rotations play.
With Sarah’s BPM’s and Paige’s BPM’s being what they are — and both being core players — one can make several inferences. And these inferences hark back to the seasons’ atmospheric stats (attached).
This season’s offense and defense (to-date) is noteworthy (many have already noted) because it’s mostly OOC, prior to the full-bloom metamorphosis that happens during the Big East schedule.
View attachment 114981
View attachment 114982
And I believe 2 years ago, UConn was not her top choice...or BY thought so.
Sarah (and Azzi) being phenomenal players and this season’s team being in the conversation as among, by UConn standards, one of the better teams are intrinsically linked.Thanks for these fascinating stats, especially the second chart. The assists and ORB numbers are pretty striking, as is the 3pt% and the FGA/game. We're taking and making more 3s than any UConn team in the last 15 years. The 2P% is near the top, but this will probably approach last year's once the conference schedule starts. The O-boards are in the top 5 and that will also likely rise in conference. The overall comparison to the greatest 4 year stretch in D1 history is pretty eye-opening.
As for BPM (and WinShares), I'm sure you have a better sense of this than I do. What catches my attention is what you suggest, namely that this is a cohort-based stat, which has to mean it isn't easy to compare across different seasons, and certainly not across different teams. I'd also expect that BPM and WS are also very dependent on the size of a data set.
I only included Win Shares in my earlier reply as another technical stat sometimes used to deepen the picture of a player's value to a team. But it also seems to me to be a 'cohort' stat and not merely an individual measure.Note: Win Shares doesn’t appear in either of the two pics.
My mistake. I made an assumption based on the attachments I had in my post.I only included Win Shares in my earlier reply as another technical stat sometimes used to deepen the picture of a player's value to a team. But it also seems to me to be a 'cohort' stat and not merely an individual measure.