Fair points, particularly about the final destinations for some key portal pieces. Who knows what new super-teams will form as a result...Until all of the transfer activity ceases, in particular, the best 20 in the lot settle in with a team, I think it's a bit too early to anoint ANY team as top 5. I thought Tennessee ended the year right about where they started as far as expectations. I also thought that their schedule was a bit backloaded so their early rankings weren't a true reflection of how good or bad they were. Yes, they played Stanford and Texas ( full disclosure: I thought they got shafted by calls...intentional or not having relevance here). But, they also had some head-scratching losses to basement SEC teams in which they were taller than at every position.
I guess Jackson is an upgrade to Burrell, the injured one, other than that I would give Burrell the edge on the defensive end. And on the offensive end...how much of a difference in point production are we talking about? A few? And ABSOLUTELY..chemistry is everything. Other questions or obstacles are fitting in a new PG. Taking the ball out of Horston's hand...will she be comfortable? Will she be more efficient? She scored a lot of points, but she wasn't very efficient, especially considering her size versus opposing defenders. She shot 39%. You can absorb that in a high-volume shooter, but her shot attempts will decrease with Jackson, Jazmine, and maybe Pissott having an impact in her first year. Horston did, use that to her advantage in rebounding. Kudos to her. The thing about offensive rebounding is....it only presents itself on missed shots. So, it looks good, but is it good? Usually, the score tells the story. You win by 5 and get 15 offensive rebounds, then something is wrong because you should win by 15 to 20.
But, again, I agree...can Harper make all these new and existing pieces click, even with an addition of Saniya. I'm assuming at this time she left SC over minutes. Will Harper give her significant minutes shooting 25%? I wouldn't and if, I'm playing behind her...I'm out of there. Tenn. needs a new offensive identity because they don't have the luxury of building it around a single dominant player. Horston is just not efficient or consistent enough to carry a team...at this point anyway. When you have this much to sort out, I don't see where there can't be growing pains along the way.
Tennessee wasn't pretty to watch last season, but before Green and then Horston were injured, they were a classic Pat Summitt team that used their size to bludgeon their opponents on the glass and mask the fact that they couldn't shoot very well with 3 consecutive attempts at the basket. When executed well, that's good enough to beat most of the field until you run into a team that a.) does it better (SC) b.) takes your strengths away from you (Stanford) or c) just shoots lights out (UConn). There are others that fit into one of these categories, but there aren't many.