Sad attempt at firing ‘for cause’ | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Sad attempt at firing ‘for cause’

I'd like to know what it is. If it's impermissible workouts, that's lame.
It's lame but it's technically something that violates NCAA rules, albeit seemingly much less important rules. What Stallings "did" is not in the NCAA or any rulebook and not a violation of any kind.
 
Hasn't affected Izzo one iota yet.

Not every school will be treated the same. Not speaking about UCONN in particular...just that their are different rules.
 
Not every school will be treated the same. Not speaking about UCONN in particular...just that their are different rules.

Are you saying not every school/HC is subject to a lack of institutional control regulation?
 
Are you saying not every school/HC is subject to a lack of institutional control regulation?

Of course they are. But lack of institutional control is defined differently for every school. ;)
 
.-.
This is the message they’re sending to potential coaching prospects.

“We will give you a contract that we will try to get out of if you don’t win.”

Good luck, kids!
It’s called reality. No school should ever put itself in an untenable situation with any position. Business doesn’t work that way, and no one should be rewarded for failure on the job.
 
Not as defined for head coaches.

'lack of institutional control' is a clause used by the NCAA at whim. And it is applied differently to every school. NCAA plays favorites, always has. Just ask Tark. The ol' haves and the have nots.
 
Are you kidding?

Pitt is trying to avoid paying $10,000,000 because Kevin Stallings talked back to a fan.

UConn is trying to avoid paying $10,000,000 because the head coach has put the program under an NCAA investigation.

These things are not the same.
Paging @gtscam. Someone tell him to get over here and jerk a few tears for KO to get Fishy to see the error in his ways.
 
4bUV7Ls.gif
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,340
Messages
4,565,646
Members
10,467
Latest member
Eil Rule


Top Bottom