MilfordHusky
Voice of Reason
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 37,470
- Reaction Score
- 128,017
Thanks.You are crazy.
Stanford looked poor today, but flying 2,500 miles and playing in front of an unfriendly crowd are not positives for Duke.
Thanks.You are crazy.
Brutal.UCLA had it but couldnt make the plays down the stretch. Orrange did.
10 misses, 4 TOs, 2 fouls, 5 pts in final 7 minutes.
Stanford 4 misses, 3 steals, 2 fouls, 14 pts
Thanks.
Stanford looked poor today, but flying 2,500 miles and playing in front of an unfriendly crowd are not positives for Duke.
Brutal.
Considering the overall score, Stanford scoring 14 points in 7 mins is more of an anomaly than UCLA scoring only 4.
Sounds a little like the Xavier game a few years ago that Stanford won at the end. The game all but belonged to UCLA.
ND is the better team clearly, though a healthy Duke team might have given them a game. I think our Stanford game was a best case scenario, and our ND games were worst case scenarios.I don't know how you can compare Stanford, the team that UConn beat by 26 on its home floor, with Notre Dame, the team that has beaten UConn twice.
I bet you McCallie, desperate to get a final four, would pay big money to play in the middle of the Stanford quad rather than have to go thru ND.
The details and clock times were different, but in both cases, Stanford won a game when it looked as if it was going to lose.Not quite as bad. Xavier had one of the most epic chokes ever, missing two wide open layups in the closing seconds.
You think Duke would rather play ND or Stanford with a shot at the final four?
Thanks.
Stanford looked poor today, but flying 2,500 miles and playing in front of an unfriendly crowd are not positives for Duke.
I bet you McCallie, desperate to get a final four, would pay big money to play in the middle of the Stanford quad rather than have to go thru ND.