- Joined
- Nov 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,718
- Reaction Score
- 7,094
I think what you're missing is that it was still Pat's team, no matter how you sliced it. The players were playing for Pat. The game plan belonged to Pat. The discipline came from Pat. The praise they were seeking was from Pat. Pat was the head coach, just not the one yelling out the in game instruction, but it was still her game plan. Going forward, the players will play for Holly. Holly will set the game plans and Holly will work to execute her own game plan. So no, Pat didn't question Holly, because Holly was there executing what Pat wanted done. Even in the huddles, Holly would gather with Pat first and then go over to the players with instructions. Sometimes, during time outs and half time, Pat was still the one delivering the message. Going forward, Holly will deliver her own message. I'm sure it will be similar, but I'm also betting some things will be unique.
The empirical evidence appears to show Holly’s coaching skills to be lacking. A lot of what you are talking about is intangible. I don’t blame you for being optimistic, but you’ve come to a place that administers reality not validation. If you want confirmation of your opinions, The Summitt is the place to be. But, since you’re here:
Perhaps Pat’s interference last year helped the team. Who knows for sure? Perhaps without Pat’s influence this year, it could be much worse. But, I wonder how much difference there will be in Holly’s demeanor. Pat is still around and at a pretty good salary for someone that is out of the picture. How confident are you that Pat will not continue to exert her influence? I can’t see Holly telling Pat to butt out.
The administration didn’t exhibit much confidence in Holly based on the relatively low salary of $485k which puts her way down on the list of best paid coaches. Money isn’t everything, but this does hurt her status. Also, the combining of the athletic departments is another question mark on the women’s program.
Thinking that the Yum Center does not affect UT isn’t realistic. Everything competitors do to improve their programs affects other programs, particularly those that are geographically close and similar in type. Existence of Yum degrades UTs program in the same way that lack of success, administrative turmoil, recruiting difficulty does - a slow degradation.
It appears that there has been a general loss of Lady Vol prestige. Most of what is written still revolves around Pat. Not much about Holly or the current team. Game attendance has been declining. With The Summit web site going pay, even less buzz is available to most – out of sight, out of mind. The volume of posting on The Summitt has shown a marked decline in volume. Even the free sites aren’t showing much activity. An indication of flagging interest?
Lots of bragging about the “tough” schedule for this year but still afraid to play Uconn. What’s up with that?