I certainly thank you for your wisdom in clarifying the validity of the call, but beyond correcting a scoring error I don't get the intent. The call aside, the violation occurred beyond regulation and then the results of that violation (extra points) is recorded as part of the scoring record. Bizarre logic and rule IMO.
It appears that the purpose of technical fouls is because they are important tools for enforcing behavior, as well as administrative & procedural rules that are important to game management.
Being responsible for game management is the very reason why referees are given their authority to control the outcome of the game.
Some of the administrative & procedural rules begin to be enforced before the game actually starts such as when a coach gives the information about their starting line up and uniform numbers which can result in a technical if incorrect or aren't legally met.
If you can understand that simple rule needs to be enforced with a technical then you can understand why there can be technicals before the game even starts that can affect the score.
I'm not going to hunt for a perfect article that can explain it to you, but the one below starts off with a reasonably good explanation that I mentioned above.
Technical fouls are a necessary, but perhaps the most misunderstood part of the game of basketball and are an important part of an official's arsenal in effectively managing the game, coaches and players.
www.momsteam.com
Humans make rules for sports that have evolved over time, and they have become accepted as being necessary and good for the game.
If people don't like the current rules, they are free to try to change them, but it can become a political battle if they think that they know more than the governing bodies such as the NCAA or the professional sports leagues.
There's are NCAA rules committee that are constantly examining the rules and are willing to accept suggestions.
But changes are usually incremental and not radical or extreme.
It takes a lot of deliberation and a majority of votes to change rules.
And the rules committee is largely made of NCAA coaches from around the country.
So a person would need to convince them about how they should be doing a better job of reviewing the rules.