Rudi Williams Top 8 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Rudi Williams Top 8

Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
6,211
Reaction Score
21,226
As long as we also got castle to reclass he checks all the boxes
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,217
Reaction Score
10,696
We say bench. But right now he’s be the second ball handler. 20-25 minutes a game easy
Exactly, even if his shooting percentages drop by 10% because of the tougher competition, he would still be a good option because we need another ball handler.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
45
Reaction Score
102
Still think that he could start, or get starter minutes in a small ball lineup that moves hawk to the 3 and Andre to the 4
 

UconnU

If he blocks 100, he blocks 100
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,735
Reaction Score
31,467
Who the heck is this guy? Lol. Strictly a one year depth piece I hope.
 

gtcam

Diehard since '65
Joined
Sep 12, 2012
Messages
10,997
Reaction Score
29,068
He's a traveling man - thats for sure
Why do these kids get so damn impatient?
If he was applying for a job (not as a player) would this bother you? Lets be honest
If I was DH I'd be digging deep into the background of this transfer
He can shoot but if he starts to erode team chemistry..............................
 

UconnU

If he blocks 100, he blocks 100
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,735
Reaction Score
31,467
He's a traveling man - thats for sure
Why do these kids get so damn impatient?
If he was applying for a job (not as a player) would this bother you? Lets be honest
If I was DH I'd be digging deep into the background of this transfer
He can shoot but if he starts to erode team chemistry..............................
I don’t know if he can shoot it. He shot 29% from 3 and 40% overall the previous year playing against better comp for K-State. This has to be strictly a depth move for us.
 

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,138
Reaction Score
49,286
I don’t know if he can shoot it. He shot 29% from 3 and 40% overall the previous year playing against better comp for K-State. This has to be strictly a depth move for us.
Agreed. His “final 8” is also pedestrian. Shouldn’t be a projected starter for us.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
1,568
Reaction Score
13,770
Pretty sure we aren’t getting him
I’ll interpret this as you knowing something. Correct me if I’m wrong. Do you know where he’s leaning, or have you just heard we’re not in the lead?
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2015
Messages
335
Reaction Score
1,776
What about that offer list is decent?? Pretty much us and a bunch of dregs.
That his Top 8, not necessarily his offer list. A google search brought up OK St, Memphis and Florida all having reached out to him as well, I don’t know the full offer list but those teams reaching out show there’s interest from other decent schools.
 
Joined
Mar 29, 2022
Messages
156
Reaction Score
1,260
You gotta love this place.

Gaffney, Diggins and CFjr transfer and the Boneyard looses their collective .

Player whose probably pretty clearly better than those 3 puts us in his final 8 and we've got people hoping he's just being brought in for depth purposes?

I don't know man. I'm glad some posters on here don't run the program.
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,733
Reaction Score
31,816
Would you rather give 25 min / starting role to this guy and have Hawkins come off the bench? Or vice versa?

There is risk to not giving Hawkins starters minutes.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
4,185
Reaction Score
41,707
Would you rather give 25 min / starting role to this guy and have Hawkins come off the bench? Or vice versa?

There is risk to not giving Hawkins starters minutes.
Stop it. Hawkins is starting no matter who transfers in here. We have 4 locks right now. Newton/Hawkins/Jackson/Sanogo. Hurley can either go 4 guards and slide Jackson to the 4, which opens up another starting spot for a guard like Rudi. Or he can go "traditional" and Karaban/Samson start.

Rudi has zero impact on Hawkins starting. They don't even play the same position lmao. Hawkins is not a ball handler, Rudi is.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
5,043
Reaction Score
18,168
That his Top 8, not necessarily his offer list. A google search brought up OK St, Memphis and Florida all having reached out to him as well, I don’t know the full offer list but those teams reaching out show there’s interest from other decent schools.
So you think he spurned Ok St, Memphis and Florida to include George Mason, Wichita State and BYU?? C'mon please
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,733
Reaction Score
31,816
Stop it. Hawkins is starting no matter who transfers in here. We have 4 locks right now. Newton/Hawkins/Jackson/Sanogo. Hurley can either go 4 guards and slide Jackson to the 4, which opens up another starting spot for a guard like Rudi. Or he can go "traditional" and Karaban/Samson start.

Rudi has zero impact on Hawkins starting. They don't even play the same position lmao. Hawkins is not a ball handler, Rudi is.
Yeah that’s why I’m asking the question.

Hurley was quoted saying he wants to return to a 4 out offense with a traditional stretch 4 (i.e Karaban or Samson if he can develop a deep shot). Jackson will be moreso a guard than a forward, handling the ball like we saw last year.

So let me ask again, with Newton (1), Jackson (3), Karaban/Johnson (4), and Sanogo (5) who would you want playing starters minutes at the 2?
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,595
Reaction Score
15,853
Yeah that’s why I’m asking the question.

Hurley was quoted saying he wants to return to a 4 out offense with a traditional stretch 4 (i.e Karaban or Samson if he can develop a deep shot). Jackson will be moreso a guard than a forward, handling the ball like we saw last year.

So let me ask again, with Newton (1), Jackson (3), Karaban/Johnson (4), and Sanogo (5) who would you want playing starters minutes at the 2?
He answered that question Hawk. Rudy is a pt. You have AJ at the pt so Ruby sits.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,056
Reaction Score
82,452
Stop it. Hawkins is starting no matter who transfers in here. We have 4 locks right now. Newton/Hawkins/Jackson/Sanogo. Hurley can either go 4 guards and slide Jackson to the 4, which opens up another starting spot for a guard like Rudi. Or he can go "traditional" and Karaban/Samson start.

Rudi has zero impact on Hawkins starting. They don't even play the same position lmao. Hawkins is not a ball handler, Rudi is.
Huh? You aren't making sense. If Hawkins is starting, and Jackson, and Newton, and Sanogo, you think there's an additional starting spot for a ball handler? Hawkins is 175 pounds (Dan said they want him at 195), he isn't holding down the small forward spot. A team with Rudi at the 2, Hawk 3 and AJ 4 is puny and would get crushed in the Big East. Hawk is working on his handle, he's the SG. Johnson is likely the other starter at the 4. There's no starting spot left on this team. There are minutes, sure.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
4,185
Reaction Score
41,707
Huh? You aren't making sense. If Hawkins is starting, and Jackson, and Newton, and Sanogo, you think there's an additional starting spot for a ball handler? Hawkins is 175 pounds (Dan said they want him at 195), he isn't holding down the small forward spot. A team with Rudi at the 2, Hawk 3 and AJ 4 is puny and would get crushed in the Big East. Hawk is working on his handle, he's the SG. Johnson is likely the other starter at the 4. There's no starting spot left on this team. There are minutes, sure.
Hawkins is 185 pounds (started last season at 170) so you're wrong there. And yes, there is an additional starting spot if you slide Hawkins to the 3 and Jackson to the 4. Jackson is a point forward at this point. He can play the 4 because he's an elite defender. Who cares if he is slightly undersized, he's the best athlete on the floor every single night. He can guard anyone
 

Online statistics

Members online
502
Guests online
5,589
Total visitors
6,091

Forum statistics

Threads
157,111
Messages
4,083,706
Members
9,979
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom