- Joined
- Mar 30, 2024
- Messages
- 297
- Reaction Score
- 1,362
The only rival for a blue blood is another blue blood.
Sometimes not even then.The only rival for a blue blood is another blue blood.
Wow, I try to stomp out the use of the r word - especially at school where I teach. Really don’t hear it anymore, as most are catching on that it makes you sound like an ignorant, mean-spirited human.I love this space. I love reading about UConn and I love reading from people that love UConn as much as I do. But some of you are flat out . St. John's was relevant last year. They are absolutely going to be a top 5 program NATIONALLY, again this coming year, and they are in the same conference as us. And they beat our a-- every time they played us last year. And the games the year before were ultra competitive. If that is not the very definition of a rivalry I do not know what is.
We complained forever about how the weak nature of the BE was costing us. Well, the BE is a little less weak now, isn't it???
I hear you but not as far though. Hartford MSA is still a million people and most of them can get to Storrs in less than 45 minutes. And we also play half our games in Hartford. I know you're probably referencing Fairfield County. UMass is 2 hours from Boston. So even 1.5 hours from the outer western suburbs. Amherst might as well be Pittsfield for people around the Boston area.UConn is also far from the population and money center of the state. But we benefit hugely by being the only game in town, which UMass is really not
Fixed it for youThis St Johns hype is unbearable. St Johns has not played in a single Sweet 16 game this millennia.
Great point.Sometimes not even then.
Serious question:
Does Penn State football have a true rival?
They've been a very formidable program for about six decades, have been competing for national titles for five and have a few national championship trophies in their display case.
Nobody would consider them a flash in the pan, a poser or any other derogatory label one would give a program that thinks it's something that it isn't. Until about forty years ago Pitt was absolutely a rival and was always their last game of the season. One strange thing about that however was that there was only about a ten year span (mid 1970's to mid 1980's) when both were very good at the same time. From WWI through the early 1960's Pitt was the far superior program but basically once Paterno took over, PSU was very good while Pitt had a terrible decade, followed by a decade where they were as good as any school, followed by a lot of mediocrity.
Penn State football is a storied program that is among the best yet really doesn't have a rival. The same can be said about our basketball program.
Don’t agree in the new landscape. It’s fine for a rivalry to blossom over a few years, and end. This one is really about the coaches.The thing that is missing here (and with some who responded to a thread on the same topic) is that a rivalry isn't something that pops up occasionally when a couple team that play each other regularly both happen to be good; it's the result of years of accumulating competition.
There is no sustainability to what is currently going on at St John's and in all candor, it is very likely that once Pitino's replacement gets somewhat comfortable in his position, we will be at the next round of major conference musical chairs and our conference opponents will all play football.
Marquette, cmon. Some Midwest new BE team. Not a chance.Since we rejoined the NBE, I would claim Marquette has been our rival.
I can't quite say that the same for Creighton since we've not done too well vs them . St Johns hasn't been our rival until beating us recently - so similar situation.
Things change, so SJU is our rival for the time being.
And the stage could not be grander. To think someone thinks Milwaukees team is a rival. Omaha’s team? A wine and cheese Nova fanbase?The BE team that is challenging us for a league title is our rival. Definitely St Johns at the moment.
Like the ones we barely play? Can’t have a rivalry without regularly playingThe only rival for a blue blood is another blue blood.
No - they regularly dominated the B12. A Houston could blossom now as they claimed their turf.Great point.
Similarly, does Kansas have a true rival?
There was a time when the rivalry was with Missouri, but that went the way of Nebraska-Oklahoma.Great point.
Similarly, does Kansas have a true rival?
Mizzou was the biggest rival. In my day they had Anthony Peeler and were good. Plus Missouri waged literal war on Lawrence and Quantrill sacked it. So the feelings are pretty deep. The team is even named for the Jayhawker soldiers who fought in the "bloody Kansas" border war with Missouri.There was a time when the rivalry was with Missouri, but that went the way of Nebraska-Oklahoma.
100% correct take on thisSometimes not even then.
Serious question:
Does Penn State football have a true rival?
They've been a very formidable program for about six decades, have been competing for national titles for five and have a few national championship trophies in their display case.
Nobody would consider them a flash in the pan, a poser or any other derogatory label one would give a program that thinks it's something that it isn't. Until about forty years ago Pitt was absolutely a rival and was always their last game of the season. One strange thing about that however was that there was only about a ten year span (mid 1970's to mid 1980's) when both were very good at the same time. From WWI through the early 1960's Pitt was the far superior program but basically once Paterno took over, PSU was very good while Pitt had a terrible decade, followed by a decade where they were as good as any school, followed by a lot of mediocrity.
Penn State football is a storied program that is among the best yet really doesn't have a rival. The same can be said about our basketball program.
Histrionics aside just no. A two year span of getting beaten and them having a highly ranked team does not a rivalry make. Longevity is a huge component, as is a bunch of other not easily definable aspects, but losing a few times to a better team with a coach who’s not around for a long time is not it.I love this space. I love reading about UConn and I love reading from people that love UConn as much as I do. But some of you are flat out . St. John's was relevant last year. They are absolutely going to be a top 5 program NATIONALLY, again this coming year, and they are in the same conference as us. And they beat our a-- every time they played us last year. And the games the year before were ultra competitive. If that is not the very definition of a rivalry I do not know what is.
We complained forever about how the weak nature of the BE was costing us. Well, the BE is a little less weak now, isn't it???
Fixed it for youThere really would be no better rival than UMass. Neighboring states, short drive, a lot in common, plenty of cause for bad blood. But they'd have to take SPORTS seriously for that to happen.
Who was that coach they had maybe 5-10 years ago who came from one of those fake high school programs, he ended up landing a top-50 recruit bc he was dating the kids mother? lol.
And your last sentence sums up why this is not a rivalry. North Carolina would never say “Good for the ACC that Duke is good.” And Duke is always good. St John’s has been to the NCAA tournament as many times since 1999 as we have won titles. I think the actually won a game over that span.Histrionics aside just no. A two year span of getting beaten and them having a highly ranked team does not a rivalry make. Longevity is a huge component, as is a bunch of other not easily definable aspects, but losing a few times to a better team with a coach who’s not around for a long time is not it.
Great for us and the Big East that St John’s is good. No, that does not make this a rivalry.
Yes. And we want to beat them this season if only to shut up their fans who mouth off and come out of their ratholes every generation or so when they field a competitive team.And your last sentence sums up why this is not a rivalry. North Carolina would never say “Good for the ACC that Duke is good.” And Duke is always good. St John’s has been to the NCAA tournament as many times since 1999 as we have won titles. I think the actually won a game over that span.
I am not comparing the "relationship" that exists between us and St. Johns with any other relationship. But you are telling me that a top 5 team for this coming year, a team that we will face at least twice, is not a rival? This may be grammar thing. Maybe the word "rival" means something different to both of us.Histrionics aside just no. A two year span of getting beaten and them having a highly ranked team does not a rivalry make. Longevity is a huge component, as is a bunch of other not easily definable aspects, but losing a few times to a better team with a coach who’s not around for a long time is not it.
Great for us and the Big East that St John’s is good. No, that does not make this a rivalry.